“THIS WILL TAKE JUST A MINUTE OF YOUR TIME”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bilateral Communication With the New York Citywide Immunization Registry Angel Aponte Computer Specialist (Software) Contact:
Advertisements

Which factors make a difference when identifying pockets of under-immunization? Gayle Moxness Hennepin County Community Health Department Minneapolis,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service SALMONELLA SUBTYPING RESULTS IN RAW PRODUCTS FSIS Notice /3/2010 Policy Development.
Using the Mass Vaccination (Mass Vax) for the North Carolina Immunization Registry.
Assessment & Reminder Recall Becky Batchelor NC Immunization Branch.
Increasing Registry Value Through Partnerships National Immunization Registry Conference Atlanta, Georgia October 28, 2003 Debbie McCune Davis The Arizona.
National Immunization Survey: Data Quality and Public-Use Data Files Meena Khare, National Center for Health Statistics Michael P. Battaglia, Abt Associates.
October 28-30, 2009 UNECE Geneva Quality Assessment of 2008 Integrated Census - Israel Pnina ZADKA Central Bureau of Statistics Israel.
Using a Help Desk Database to Identify Training Issues, Improve Customer Service, and Increase Office Efficiency Jennifer West, MPH Health Educator VaxTrack.
Provider Management Database Facilitates Provider Enrollment and Program Evaluation Jennifer West, MPH Health Educator VaxTrack Immunization Registry Program.
The Use of Random Digit Dialing in Household Surveys: Challenges and Changes Chris Chapman 2008 IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 11, 2008
RI School Children Immunization Assessment From this year, RI Immunization Program collects immunization data directly from student’s health.
Parental Vaccine Safety Concerns: Results from the National Immunization Survey, Norma Allred, PhD, Kate Shaw, MS, Tammy Santibanez, PhD, Donna.
Putting The Pieces Together: A Comprehensive and Integrated Immunization Provider Resource Database David Kopald, Analyst Anne Cordon, MPH, SDIR Manager.
Immunization Registries and Public Health 2004 National Immunization Conference May 2004 Nashville, Tennessee.
Utilizing Registry Functionality and Data for Statewide School and Childcare Reporting First Year Results Mary Jo Flenner, B.S. Michigan Dept. of Community.
Improving Reporting and IIS-Based Coverage by Conducting VFC Accountability Through an IIS: The New York City Experience Michael Andreas Hansen, MPH, Melissa.
Donna Rickert, M.A., Dr.P.H. Abigail Shefer, M.D. National Immunization Program Immunization Services Division Health Services Research and Evaluation.
Using the National Change of Address Database to Locate Children Designated as Moved or Gone Elsewhere CHEAR Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University.
Angel Rivera, MD (Puerto Rico Immunization Program)
Pengjun Lu, PhD, MPH;1 Kathy Byrd, MD, MPH;2
Conversely Mixed Mode in the Swedish Crime Survey Sanna Wallin, researcher The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Thank you! It’s very nice.
Quality Assurance Project – 2007
Georgia Immunization Rates
Immunize LA Kids Coalition
BACKGROUND New Jersey Immunization Information
Diana Bartlett Immunization Registry Support Branch
Enrique Ramirez1, Julie Morita1
Keys to Practice-Based Immunization Recall
Good morning to all. I am…………
The Role of the Immunization Registry in a Measles Outreak, New York City The Role of the Immunization Registry in a Measles Outbreak, New York City Ynolde.
VFC Site Visit Questionnaire and AFIX as Tools for Quality Assessment
Integrating Registries and AFIX for Data Quality
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Pediatric Deaths:
Immunization Registry and Provider-Reported Vaccination Histories: Assessing Missing Vaccinations Linda Piccinino (Abt Associates), Meena Khare (CDC),
Justin Weisser, MPH; Nathan Crawford, MPH; Mimi Luther, BA
Eliminating Disparities in Adult Immunization: A Primary Care/Public
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Bureau of Immunization
What’s going on out there
Childhood Immunization Rates
Decline in Varicella Incidence in Texas
Daniel Hopfensperger Program Manager Wisconsin Immunization Program
Do Sources of Parental Information Outside the Health Care Provider’s Office Vary by Immunization Status? Barbara Bardenheier, MPH MA National Immunization.
Saving Vaccine and Costs With Immunization Registries
The Benefits of Data Exchange Between Registries and MCOs
VFC and Counties: Working Together
Dialing up for Teen Shots: Immunization Status of San Diego County Adolescents Wendy Wang, MPH County of San Diego ● Health and Human Services Agency.
Coverage Rates in Texas
Philadelphia Department of Public Health
Natalie Darling, M.P.H. Kate Shaw, M.S. Lawrence Barker, Ph.D
S. Findley, M. Irigoyen, P. Sternfels, F. Chimkin, M. Sanchez
Vaccination coverage of U. S
Introduction to National Immunization Survey and Public-Use Data Files
Metro ACEs Data 2018 Community Health Needs Assessment
Presented by Anne Cordon, SDIR Manager
Merced County Immunization Program Immunization Rates Best Practices
Vice President, Health Care Coverage and Access
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance.
Using the Registry to Conduct WinCASA Assessments: Lessons Learned
Using Ohio’s Impact SIIS Data in Assessing Immunization Rates
Brief In-Office Demonstrations Yield High Enrollment Rates
With a Little Help From Our Friends II: Partnerships and the Flu Vaccine Redistribution Effort, Sue Hunt Kathleen W. Gustafson Jennifer Danzig.
Solving the Registry Puzzle with Schools and Childcare Providers
Improving Immunization Rates Using the Azara DRVS Registry
Evaluation of the San Diego County Baby Track Program
Immunization Status of Colorado Kindergartners
Karen Wooten, MA Elizabeth Luman, MS Lawrence Barker, PhD
The Texas Child Care Immunization Assessment Survey
National Immunization Conference 2005 March 22, 2005 ~ Washington D.C.
Auditing Techniques for Ensuring Quality Data in a Registry
Presentation transcript:

“THIS WILL TAKE JUST A MINUTE OF YOUR TIME” USE OF REGISTRY TO VERIFY RANDOM DIGIT DIAL SURVEY INFANT COVERAGE DATA San Diego Immunization Program

SDIP The San Diego Immunization Program Established in 1992 County of San Diego HHSA the lead agency Collaborative of community agencies and programs Access and availability of immunization services Community education and outreach Assessment and evaluation

SDIR The San Diego Regional Immunization Registry Established in 1997 Enhancements to web application Data exchange with Imperial County PROW assessment site Health Plan interactions Latest stats: over half million clients with IZ records

What is the RDD Telephone Survey? Survey of immunizations of San Diego County residents Ages 19 months and above Provides additional information, wider age range, and larger sample size than National Immunization Survey data on San Diego

Methods of the RDD Telephone Survey Random selected telephone numbers Multi-language interviewers Immunization dates from recall and records Verification of information from providers Weighted statistical coverage

BACKGROUND RDD surveys assess vaccination coverage 1995 – 1998 children’s vaccination dates reported by parents were verified only by directly contacting healthcare providers

VERIFICATION METHODS BEFORE REGISTRY ·  Surveyors called households, requested vaccination dates of children 19–36 months, and permission to verify dates with providers the parents listed. ·  For children not UTD according to parent-reported vaccinations, staff members requested providers to report vaccination dates. ·  Staff entered shot dates from parents & providers into database

VERIFICATION METHODS WITH REGISTRY AND PROVIDERS Since 1999, the first year the Registry was available, children not UTD were looked up in the Registry to verify vaccination If UTD in Registry, then the provider was not contacted Children not UTD in the Registry were further verified by contacting their providers

VERIFICATION RESULTS WITH REGISTRY OR PROVIDER Denominator = number of children whose records we should verify (parents gave permission to verify & not UTD in parents’ records). If child is UTD in Registry, we do not try to verify further. Not verified (red) because: we could not find provider, provider not find child in records, a few providers declined to verify. 1995: we did not calculate verification results, because in that first year, they collected little data on verification process. 1999: we did not calculate, because in the first year of the Registry, they used the Registry little for verification. 2001: no RDD survey. 2003: UTD in Registry (yellow) lower than in 2002, because 2003 UTD included Hep A & pneumococcal. Before Registry With Registry

VERIFICATION RESULTS WITH REGISTRY Denominator = number of children whose records we should verify (parents gave permission to verify & not UTD in parents’ records) Any IZ in Registry = had any shot dates in Registry, whether UTD or NUTD UTD in Registry lower in 2003 than 2002, because 2003 UTD included Hep A & pneumococcal

CHALLENGES OF USING REGISTRY Misspelled names Different names on different records Wrong birth dates Overcome by searching alternatives until find matching information These problems are easier to solve with Registry than with providers

BENEFITS TO IMMUNIZATION STAFF Verifying in the Registry is faster than by contacting provider Easier to try alternate spellings and birth dates in the Registry Finding discrepancies in data enables correcting Registry data Registry always works, but some faxes to & from providers are lost in transmission Able to verify more children with Registry + providers than with only providers

BENEFITS TO CLINICIANS Need to verify fewer children’s vaccinations for the Immunization Program’s surveys The average provider’s list of children decreased from 7 to 6 children; greater reductions for providers using Registry Clinics who use only the Registry for vaccination record keeping need not verify any shot dates Reduced requests for data from public health maintains relationships

CONCLUSIONS As more providers increase the numbers of children in the Registry, it becomes more useful for verifying vaccination coverage In future, Registry alone might be used to calculate vaccination coverage instead of conducting surveys