Will Travel for Food: Spatial Discounting in Two New World Monkeys

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

Mucosal Immunology of Food Allergy M. Cecilia Berin, Hugh A. Sampson Current Biology Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages R389-R400 (May 2013) DOI: /j.cub
Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Alexandra Alvergne, Virpi Lummaa Trends in Ecology & Evolution Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages
Ancient Endo-siRNA Pathways Reveal New Tricks Julie M. Claycomb Current Biology Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages R703-R715 (August 2014) DOI: /j.cub
The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
The Origins and Evolution of Vertebrate Metamorphosis Vincent Laudet Current Biology Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages R726-R737 (September 2011) DOI: /j.cub
Attila Andics, Márta Gácsi, Tamás Faragó, Anna Kis, Ádám Miklósi 
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Now Playing: Farnesol in the Biofilm
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Mark J. Costello, Chhaya Chaudhary
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Episodic Memory: Rats Master Multiple Memories
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Spontaneous Metatool Use by New Caledonian Crows
Infant cognition Current Biology
Addiction: Flies Hit the Skids
András Liker, Robert P. Freckleton, Tamás Székely  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages R668-R669 (September 2012)
Physarum Current Biology
Miguel P. Eckstein, Kathryn Koehler, Lauren E. Welbourne, Emre Akbas 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Marianne Elias, Colin Fontaine, F.J. Frank van Veen  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Plant vacuoles Current Biology
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages R129-R131 (February 2006)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Miguel P. Eckstein, Kathryn Koehler, Lauren E. Welbourne, Emre Akbas 
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Now Playing: Farnesol in the Biofilm
Rhesus Monkeys Attribute Perceptions to Others
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Honeybee buzz attenuates plant damage by caterpillars
Robert A. Harris, Paul Graham, Thomas S. Collett  Current Biology 
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Social Dynamics: Knowledgeable Lemurs Gain Status
Jannath Begum Ali, Charles Spence, Andrew J. Bremner  Current Biology 
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Patience Current Biology
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
The Evolutionary Origins of Human Patience: Temporal Preferences in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Adults  Alexandra G. Rosati, Jeffrey R. Stevens, Brian.
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Evolutionary Psychology of Spatial Representations in the Hominidae
Early Life: Embracing the RNA World
Federica Amici, Filippo Aureli, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Social Coordination: Patience Is a Virtue for Vervet Monkeys
Jenni Deveau, Daniel J. Ozer, Aaron R. Seitz  Current Biology 
Evelina Fedorenko, John Duncan, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs
J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan 
Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Presentation transcript:

Will Travel for Food: Spatial Discounting in Two New World Monkeys Jeffrey R. Stevens, Alexandra G. Rosati, Kathryn R. Ross, Marc D. Hauser  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 20, Pages 1855-1860 (October 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Apparatus (A) Both tamarins and marmosets traveled to receive their rewards in a plexiglas enclosure. (B) The food rewards were lined up in an array on a ledge in the box, each piece ∼1 cm apart. (C) Food boxes were placed at one of seven distances (35–245 cm) from the front of the enclosure. A wall was placed behind the far box. Current Biology 2005 15, 1855-1860DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of Species and Distance on Choice Tamarins maintained their preference for the large reward across all distances, whereas marmosets reduced their preference for the large reward as the distance to large increased. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2005 15, 1855-1860DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effect of Species and Distance on Running Time Tamarins and marmosets took the same amount of time to travel to the short distance (increment one, 35 cm). Tamarins, however, traveled to the farthest distance (increment seven, 245 cm) significantly faster than marmosets. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2005 15, 1855-1860DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of Species and Reward Magnitude on Choice Neither tamarins nor marmosets altered their preferences for the larger reward when choosing between one and three pellets or between two and six pellets. Therefore, they maintained their preferences for the same ratio of rewards but ignored absolute magnitude. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2005 15, 1855-1860DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions