Discussion & Recommendation for Gate 2: Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASHINGTON STATE BOARD FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGES STUDENT LISTENING WEB SURVEY.
Advertisements

TECH581 Improve/Control Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 12/09/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed.
Puget Sound Coalition for College and Career Readiness Compact Implementation John Welch, Superintendent Peter Daniels, Executive Director of Communications.
eMerger Integration Planning
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
CtcLink Project Update Articulation and Transfer Council April 16, 2015 Catherine Kwong, ctcLink Project Team.
Strategic Planning Deanna Herwald Vice President-Quality Management Systems.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Implementation Overview EOB Methodology John PolichSeptember 2014.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Florida Standards Alternate Assessment (FSAA) Alternate Assessment Coordinator.
ESP Contact Meeting FY 17.
Quantum Leap Project Management
Children Services Committee Project 4 Update
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
Status of the MICE Construction Project
4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work
Overview of Project Planning
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
Campus Master Plan.
Supplemental Learning- AIR
Project Steering Committee Meeting 27 May 2015 :14h00 – 16h00
Cobb County Nonprofit Grant Process FY 17/18
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
Description of Revision
Budget & Planning Calendar.
Project Name Steering Committee Meeting Project Manager: Project Manager Name Program Manager: Program Manager Name Project Sponsor: Project Sponsor Name.
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix
ctcLink Project Update Technology Institute – Guided Pathways
NYHQ DSRIP Cultural Competency & Health Literacy Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
ctcLink New & Improved Process
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
ctclink steering committee
How do we carry out the election process last year?
Executive Steering Committee Meeting January 20, 2010
Capital Updates Click to edit Master.
Sam Houston State University
ctclink Steering Committee
District Improvement plan
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
Request for Proposals (RFP) Implementation Planning
How to keep your Enterprise GIS Project on Track
Recommendations for using this ‘framework’ template
Updating Webpages For SMCOE Website Refresh
Information Technology Project Management
SmartMeterTM Steering Committee Update – July 2012
Ctclink steering committee May 22, 2018
ctcLink Project Update for Executive Leadership committee
Back-End Payor Sub-Group
ctcLink Project Update ctcLink Steering Committee
ctcLink Project Update ctcLink Steering Committee
ctcLink Project Update ctcLink Steering Committee
HOW TO USE THE NEW GLOBAL GRANT REPORT
Sam Houston State University
Assessment Needs Analysis
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Project Progress Summary - Week 18
ctcLink Project Update ctcLink Executive Leadership Committee
Central Valley Water Board Meeting of 29 March 2012
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
ctcLink Steering Committee
PRESENTATION ON THE CONDITIONAL GRANT TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE
ctcLink Steering Committee
Speaker’s Name, SAP Month 00, 2017
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Britt Bell:
ctcLink Steering Committee
Guided Pathways Requirements Gathering Workshop # 2
ctcLink Steering Committee
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

Discussion & Recommendation for Gate 2: Implementation DG4 gate 1: peer review Discussion & Recommendation for Gate 2: Implementation ctcLink Steering Committee, September 10, 2019 Reuth Kim

DG4 GATE 1: milestones Milestones Target Date Status Dashboard Reporting in Status Reports March 2019 - Present Ongoing OCM/College Relations Onsite Visit March 2019 Complete Monthly Check-Ins to Prepare for Peer Review May, June, July 2019 Deliverables for Gate #1 Uploaded to cDR July 2019 College Leadership Approves/Sign-Off Deliverables July 2019 - Present *In Progress / Complete Peer Review July 29-30, 2019 Steering Committee Recommendation/Decision September 10, 2019 In Progress *In Progress for Centralia (refer to slides #7-8) and Wenatchee Valley (refer to slides #12-13).  

Peer Review Participants Held July 29-30, 2019, hosted by Highline College DG4 College PM Participants DG5 & DG6 College PM Observers (non-evaluators) ctcLink Project Team Members Centralia, Carrie Powell Seattle, Daniel Cordas Edmonds, Ligia Cicos Wenatchee Valley, Jason Hetterle Highline, Pat Daniels Bates TC, Beth Cummings (6) Green River, Sherry Felchlin (5) Bellingham TC, Nat Reilly (5) South Puget Sound, Missy Yates (6) Clover Park TC, Brian Lee (6) Whatcom, Ken Bronstein (5) Everett, Tim Rager (5) Christy Campbell Reuth Kim Roger Curry Kristy Snow Eli Hayes

Gate 1: peer evaluation/rubrics SUMMARY Item Deliverable Centralia Edmonds Highline Seattle Wenatchee 1 College Project Charter 3 2 Resource Plan & Budget Baseline MS-Project Schedule 4 OCM Plan 4a Begin Change Impact Analysis 5 Communication Plan 6 Training Plan 7 Risk Management Plan 2 / 3 8 Data Cleansing Plan 9 Legacy Business Process Mapping 10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Additional discussion/Recommendations DG4 deliverables/comments DG5 and DG6 PM observations Next steps DG4 - Estimated to begin Global Design Adoption Courses in October 2019 DG5 - Peer Review slated for early December 2019 Reference Links DG4 Peer Review Rubrics – Google sheet CDR > College Readiness > DG4 Peer Review

Appendix Instructions Please refer to the appendices for college-specific rubrics summary College deliverable documents are hyperlinked to cDR in each college’s rubric slide Appendix Contents, slides 7-13 Rubric Results by College Status of Items Scored “2”

Centralia college GATE#1: CENTRALIA DELIVERABLES Evaluated by Edmonds Evaluated by Highline Evaluated by Seattle Evaluated by WVC Item #1 College Project Charter  3 Item #2 Resource Plan & Budget Item #3 Baseline MS-Project Schedule Item #4 OCM Plan Item #4a Begin Change Impact Analysis Item #5 Communication Plan Item #6 Training Plan Item #7 Risk Management Plan 2 Item #8 Data Cleansing Plan Item #9 Legacy Business Process Mapping Item #10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis *Items scored “2” are targeted to be completed by end of September 2019, refer to slide #8. RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Centralia status for items rated “2” Item No. Discrepancy Action Estimated Time to Complete Item #7: Risk Management Plan Needs mitigation, stakeholders/owners and tracking tool. Risk Log will be distributed to Centralia College Executive Steering Committee and Working Group on Aug. 23, 2019 with a request for feedback. Follow up with one-on-one conversations with the various risk owners. Finalize at the September Working Group Meeting on Sept. 25, 2019. Present to Centralia College Executive Sponsor for sign-off. End of September 2019 Item #10: Supplemental Systems Analysis Additional work and analysis needs to be completed. Requires IT involvement. Centralia IT Department has initiated a comprehensive Supplemental Systems analysis which they expect to complete by Sept. 16, 2019. Executive Management Team will review and is expected to approve on Sept. 27, 2019. Sept. 27, 2019

Edmonds community college GATE 1: EDMONDS DELIVERABLES Evaluated by Centralia Evaluated by Highline Evaluated by Seattle Evaluated by WVC Item #1 College Project Charter  3 Item #2 Resource Plan & Budget Item #3 Baseline MS-Project Schedule Item #4 OCM Plan Item #4a Begin Change Impact Analysis Item #5 Communication Plan Item #6 Training Plan Item #7 Risk Management Plan Item #8 Data Cleansing Plan Item #9 Legacy Business Process Mapping Item #10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Evaluated by Centralia Highline college GATE 1: HIGHLINE DELIVERABLES Evaluated by Centralia Evaluated by Edmonds Evaluated by Seattle Evaluated by WVC Item #1 College Project Charter  3 Item #2 Resource Plan & Budget Item #3 Baseline MS-Project Schedule Item #4 OCM Plan Item #4a Begin Change Impact Analysis Item #5 Communication Plan Item #6 Training Plan Item #7 Risk Management Plan Item #8 Data Cleansing Plan Item #9 Legacy Business Process Mapping Item #10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Seattle COLLEGE district GATE 1: SEATTLE DELIVERABLES Evaluated by Centralia Evaluated by Edmonds Evaluated by Highline Evaluated by WVC Item #1 College Project Charter  3 Item #2 Resource Plan & Budget Item #3 Baseline MS-Project Schedule Item #4 OCM Plan Item #4a Begin Change Impact Analysis Item #5 Communication Plan Item #6 Training Plan Item #7 Risk Management Plan Item #8 Data Cleansing Plan Item #9 Legacy Business Process Mapping Item #10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Wenatchee valley COLLEGE GATE 1: WVC DELIVERABLES Evaluated by Centralia Evaluated by Edmonds Evaluated by Highline Evaluated by Seattle Item #1 College Project Charter  3 Item #2 Resource Plan & Budget 2 Item #3 Baseline MS-Project Schedule Item #4 OCM Plan Item #4a Begin Change Impact Analysis Item #5 Communication Plan Item #6 Training Plan Item #7 Risk Management Plan Item #8 Data Cleansing Plan Item #9 Legacy Business Process Mapping Item #10 Initial Supplemental Systems Analysis *Items scored “2” are targeted to be completed by end of September. Refer to slide #13. RATING SCALE 1= LOWEST Missing all components, deliverable not complete 2= MIDDLE Missing some components, deliverable almost complete 3= HIGHEST All components identified, deliverable complete

Wenatchee status for items rated “2” Item No. Discrepancy Action Estimated Time to Complete Item #2: Budget No approved budget for this fiscal year. Cabinet is still finalizing details of this year’s budget. In the meantime, WVC’s PM is allowed to operate from last year’s budget amounts. This allows the PM to make purchases and move forward with ctcLink. There is no barrier to required spending at this point. Budget will go to the Board of Trustees on Sept. 11, 2019 for approval. Sept. 15, 2019 Item #9: Legacy Business Process Mapping Correlate IWP processes to specific maps. While not required, WVC PM thinks this process is very valuable.  This is additional work, but will help the SMEs with more engagement and understanding of the current process. FIN is complete. Sept. 30, 2019 Item #10: Supplemental Systems Analysis Add budget impacts (if any). Further impact analysis required. Adding a project assistant to help with this task. WVC has completed the work from IT-developed applications. No currently listed applications have a quantifiable budget impact. We will use the Legacy Business Process Maps to complete the rest with a review from the SMEs.