© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Result of intention to use

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

student achievement scores

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. The comparison of government model and STWG model training

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Text Format Files Number Files Size(Bytes) Words Number

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Order cycle in which item n has to be sent

To what extend do you buy products or services through SMA?

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 6. ANOVA Showing Influence of Subject Combination on Teachers Perception of Mathematics Topics Variable N Mean D.F S.S M.S f-cal f-tab P Chm/Mth 11 24 4.55 181.7 67.4 2.70 2.53 S Mth/Phy 10 23 Comp/Mth 6 21 Mth/Int 4 16 Mth/Geo 3 17 Mth/Eco 26 20 Akanni Olubukola et al. An Investigation of Difficult Topics in the Senior Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum as Perceived by Student Teachers. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 7, 844-848. doi:10.12691/ education-3-7-7 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.