2019 Mid-year budget review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monetary Policy Challenges March 2010 International Monetary Fund Nicholas Staines IMF, African Department
Advertisements

MDBS Underlying Principles MACRO-ECONOMICS 11 May 2010.
Recent Developments in the Region and Macedonia Opening of the NBRM-WB PIC Alexander Tieman 16 December, 2010.
Revision of the macroeconomic projections for 2011 Dimitar Bogov Governor August, 2011.
The Russian Default of 1998 A case study of a currency crisis Francisco J. Campos, UMKC 10 November 2004.
Annual Report 2003 Bank van de Nederlandse Antillen Willemstad, July 5, 2004.
Saving, Investment, and the Financial System
Macroeconomic Framework and Fiscal Policy Sanjeev Gupta, Fiscal Affairs Department IMF.
1998 Russian Crisis Group 8 Nery Lemus Wilmer Molina Omer Erinal Mollah Yerima.
Tough choices ahead Illustrating the choices and trade-offs in the next spending review Kayte Lawton and Amna Silim September 2012.
NATIONAL CONSULTATION ON THE ECONOMY Theme: “The Architecture of an Efficient and Sustainable Public Sector in Support of our Economic Growth Agenda” St.
1 MONETARY POLICY STATEMENT FOR SECOND QUARTER th May 2015 Bank of Zambia.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
General Directorate of Annual Programs and Conjunctural Evaluations1 15 February 2010 Turkish Economy: Macroeconomic Developments in 2009 and Medium Term.
AN OVERVIEW ON TURKISH ECONOMY AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS KEMAL UNAKITAN MINISTER OF FINANCE September 5, 2008 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF FINANCE.
QB March 2011 Presentation by the South African Reserve Bank to the Portfolio Committee on Finance Quarterly Bulletin March April 2011.
Concepts of Fiscal policy. 2 of 38 Fiscal policy Fiscal policy refers to the policy of the government regarding Taxation (Revenue collection through taxes)
1 Chapter 12 Budget Balance and Government Debt. 2 Budget Terms A Budget Surplus exists when Tax Revenues are greater than expenditures and is the difference.
Chapter 21 Financial Effects of the Government and Foreign Sectors ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
MDTA Recent Macroeconomic and PRGF Developments June 17, 2004 By IMF Dhaka office Do not quote.
Eesti Pank Bank of Estonia Andres Sutt Estonian Economy - on the course for soft landing? October 25, 2007.
Angola: Perspectives on the Financial Crisis
Debt Sustainability Analysis March 2010 IMF and World Bank Nicholas StainesAntonio Nucifora IMF, African DepartmentWorld Bank, Africa Region
FISCAL REGIME FOR MINERAL OPERATIONS By RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE FACULTY OF LAW, KNUST.
Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE ENSURING STABILITY AND GROWTH PLAMEN ORESHARSKI MINISTER OF FINANCE 12 December 2007 Sofia.
What is a budget surplus and a budget deficit? A budget surplus is when extra money is left over in a budget after expenses are paid. A budget deficit.
Ministry of Finance Juan A. Correa Head of Research Department October 2013 Fiscal Responsibility and Macroeconomic Performance: The Case of Chile.
Choose a country and explain why they may have seen a rise in their fiscal deficit – create a short report on the country.
1. What would you do with $5,000? Be specific. 2. What percentage of taxes should the government take? 3. Where is the safest place to keep your money?
ESNA Economic Outlook 2016: Alberta’s Fiscal and Environmental Challenges “It could be worse…..” Mike Percy Ph.D. December 3,
1 MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATEMENT FOR THIRD QUARTER th August 2015 Bank of Zambia.
Romania: Economic Situation And Prospects
NATIONAL BUDGET.
Scotland’s money November: 2016.
CISI – Financial Products, Markets & Services
BULGARIA – ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
The Federal Reserve and The Supply and Cost of Credit
Basic Finance The Federal Reserve
2005 MTBPS 25 October 2005 Introduction Macroeconomic overview
Ukraine - Economic Situation and Reforms
Conference on Public Expenditure Reform
The Balance of Payments
3.4 Managing the Economy Fiscal Policy
The Budget and Economic Polices
Budget Balance and Government Debt
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATEMENT FOR THIRD QUARTER 2018
Economics - Notes for Teachers
Russian Economic Report No. 24
Saving, Investment, and the Financial System
INTEREST RATES, MONEY AND PRICES IN THE LONG RUN
PRESENTED AT THE BONDS, LOANS AND SUKUK. EAST AFRICA BY FELISTER S
Saving, Investment, and the Financial System
Module D How External Users Assess Management’s Operating Decisions
Fiscal Sustainability
Budget Sustainability Policies in the Republic of Belarus
2005 MTBPS 25 October 2005 Introduction Macroeconomic overview
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
NS4540 Winter Term 2018 Peru’s Economy
Saving, Investment, and the Financial System
QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW Q1 2018
QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW Q1 2018
Toward Stability & Growth
KOREA Econoic survey 김태용 한요셉 심준현
Federal Budget Significance of a Government Budget p. 455
2019 Mid Term Budget Review August 2019.
MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATEMENT FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2019
MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATEMENT FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2019
Shebo Nalishebo Research Fellow, Public Finance 12 September 2019
Presentation transcript:

2019 Mid-year budget review Shebo Nalishebo, Research Fellow, Public Finance 12 September, 2019

CHALLENGING Macroeconomic ENVIRONMENT GDP growth (projected at 4%) revised downwards to 2-3%; Immediately sends red flags about revenue targets Despite constrained growth (2.6% in Q1), revenue targets were broadly in line with the targets Inflation breached the 6-8% threshold beginning May Adverse weather conditions undermined agriculture production, culminating into higher food prices. International reserves (expected to be at least 3 months of import cover) depleted to 1.6 months as at end-June 2019 Country more vulnerable to liquidity risks Load-shedding, reminiscent of 2015 when GDP declined from US$27 billion in 2014 to US$21 billion in 2015

BRINGING DOWN THE DEFICIT Government is on track to meet its fiscal deficit target Fiscal deficit target of 6.5% of GDP (down from 7.2% in 2018) The fiscal deficit in H1 was 2.9% of GDP well within the 6.5% annual target due to higher than projected revenues largely due to improved collection of non- tax revenue, and the scaling down of recurrent expenditure But spending is being squeezed by higher than planned debt servicing costs and capital expenditure and capital expenditure Capital expenditure K3 billion above target has already used 73% of total planned capital expenditure for 2019 Debt interest payments K2 billion (or 27%) above target already gorged 65% of the approved budget on interest payments in H1 alone, squeezing out other domestic spending.

REVENUE Revenue collection in H1 was higher than planned K32.6 bn in revenue and grants, equivalent to 10.9% of GDP (2019 target: >18% of GDP) Amounts to 56% of the approved revenue target for 2019, and 8% above the projection for H1. VAT performed better than target projections Other major tax types disappointed Against a target of K7.5 bn, the actual VAT collections were K8.7 bn Impressive collection in non-tax revenues K7.0 bn, which was 50% above target. This is due to higher than anticipated dividends and increased collections for user fees, fines and other charges

RISKS TO REVENUE PERFORMANCE Unfavourable mining fiscal regime: mining sector bombarded with a number of tax measures Increased mineral royalty rates by 1.5 percentage points at all levels of the sliding scale and introduction of new tiers Made mineral royalty tax non-deductible for income tax purposes Introduced an import duty at the rate of 5% copper and cobalt concentrates Introduced an export duty on precious metals (which included gold, precious stones and gemstones) at the rate of 15% Lifted the suspension of the export duty on manganese ores and concentrates which was put in place in 2012 and increase this duty from 10 to 15% Business uncertainty brought about by planned introduction of the non-refundable Sales Tax in place of VAT VAT refunds risen as businesses look to make claims ahead of the sales tax launch date VAT claims have increased from a monthly average of K800m in 2018 to K1.4 bn per month in the first half of 2019 Subdued growth due to the effects of load shedding and increased debt

EXPENDITURE Spending in the first half of 2019 was K2.8 bn above projections mainly due to an additional K2bn on higher than projected interest payments and extra K3 bn on capital expenditure. Capital expenditure was the highest expenditure item. It accounted for K15 bn or 32% of total expenditure. Non-capital expenditure has been restrained. The public sector wage bill, interest payments, subsidies and other recurrent expenditures were 81% of domestic revenues during the first half of 2019 This implies that all recurrent expenditures can be completely covered from domestic revenues. Looking good for fiscal sustainability

RECURRENT EXPENDITURE …IN MORE DETAIL Social benefits hard hit Government only managed less than 20% of projected spend. Arrears build-up due to non-payment for goods & services reported at K17.6 billion end March 2019 Difficulties for businesses in accessing credit from commercial banks Resulting in a reduced pace of economic activity. In August, the Finance Minister proposed a K9.8 billion supplementary budget to cover an emerging financing gap. K6.4 bn of this is required to meet higher than anticipated debt obligations, due to depreciation of the Kwacha against the dollar, and to cover shortfalls over maturities of Government securities. Approximately K8.7 bn is to be financed through the declaration of savings from within the existing budget. Likely to further worsen arrears & funding to social benefits

FINANCING the deficit 6.5% fiscal deficit translates to ~K20bn borrowing Borrowing in H1 was K10.9 bn. Mostly funded by external borrowing and this is likely to continue for the rest of 2019 More external borrowing mitigates the crowding-out effect of private sector borrowing But it makes the country more susceptible to exchange rate risks Govt requires an additional K6.4bn for increased debt servicing costs (supplementary budget) 1.4% of GDP target for domestic borrowing likely to be met, not because of fiscal prudence, but because of no money in the domestic market Domestic markets remain shallow and undiversified limited investor base – mostly banks & pension funds Against a target of 1.0% of GDP in domestic borrowing in the first half of the year, the Government only realised a tenth of that amount.

KEY MESSAGES & RECOMMENDATIONS Revenues were above target partly due to higher than planned income from dividends The reorganisation of state-owned enterprises can bring in more dividends Non-deductibility of mineral royalties for income tax purposes hurting mines’ bottom lines and likely to hurt growth Consider reversal of this measure Sales tax talk has created uncertainty and increased claims Reconsider migration to sales tax given the adverse ramifications such as the cascading effect Continued higher than planned capital expenditure, which is largely borrowed externally, contributing to high debt servicing payments Debt service payments take precedence over other spending, compromising service delivery & increasing accumulation of arrears Ministry of Finance needs to devise an arrears clearance strategy with a phased approach of how the arrears will be dealt with in the short to medium term Government needs to ring-fence social spending

CONCLUSION The Government needs to improve investor confidence and remove uncertainties brought about by the new mining fiscal regime and the impending sales tax Increasing taxes in a constrained growth environment is a definite no-no: Government should instead consider reducing some tax rates (e.g. non-deductibility of sales tax from income tax) to lower business costs and stimulate productivity & production. This will in turn help spur investment, bring back the growth, improve revenue receipts to fund critical social services which are presently under-funded Externally-borrowed funds are mainly used for building infrastructure. This adds to debt servicing costs which are prioritised over other spending. Therefore, capital spending needs to be rationalised.