Utilitarianism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Advertisements

Hedonism & Utilitarianism
The Power of Moral Theories
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Utilitarianism.
Secular Responses Use of the Embryo. Utilitarianism Based on the idea of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or majority Also based on hedonism.
Utilitarianism Guiding Principle 5.
1Utilitarianism Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
Teleological Ethics: Morality is determined by the consequences of actions u Hedonism: value (good) is pleasure/happiness l Egoism: my happiness is the.
Utilitarianism the Good, the Bad, the Ugly. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism: the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its usefulness.
Standards of Conduct DoD’s Standards of Conduct
Consequentialist Ethical Theories u Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests u Hedonism: the good is pleasure l Pursue pleasures not.
ETHICS BOWL CONSEQUENTIALism.
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Utililitarianism John Stuart Mill John Stuart Mill Rejected Christianity Believed that only consequences matter in making moral judgments.
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a relative ethical theory It based on the concept of utility Utilitarianism is a teleological/consequentialist theory.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
 The benefits of embryo research come mainly from stem cell usage  it is hoped that stem cells can be stimulated to develop any tissue or organ of the.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Utilitarianism or Consequentialism Good actions are those that result in good consequences. The moral value of an action is extrinsic to the action itself.
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Act and Rule Utilitariansim
1 Ethics of Computing MONT 113G, Spring 2012 Session 18 Ethical reasoning.
Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Normative Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology
Nicole Pongratz Allisen Jacques Shannon Griese Amber Teichmiller 4/13/2010.
MORAL REASONING A methodology to help people deal with moral dilemmas The Key to doing well on paper 3.
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863) PHIL 102, UBC Summer 2015 Christina Hendricks Except parts noted otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC-BY 4.0CC-BY.
J.S. Mill Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Consequentialism v. Deontology. Ticking Bomb Scenario.
 Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill  Reason not Revelation  Consequentialism – good or bad, right or wrong, are based on outcomes.
Ethical theories and approaches in Business
Utilitarianism.
Bernard Williams: A Critique of Utilitarianism Phil 240, Introduction to Ethical Theory, W6L5 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV.
Utilitarianism Learning Intention:
John Stuart Mill ( ) An Introduction to Mill’s form of Utilitarianism in comparison to Bentham’s.
Lesson III Normative Ethics
Recap on Ethical Theory
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
Mill and Bentham’s Utilitarianism
On your whiteboard: What is teleology? What is hedonism?
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
20th century conflict day one
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Ethical concepts and ethical theories Topic 3
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 2: NORMATIVE THEORIES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Handout # 2 CLO # 2 Explain the rationale behind adoption of normative.
Presentation transcript:

Utilitarianism

Basic Tenets of J.S. Mill’s Utilitarianism Based solely on human reason and observation No revelation Easy to grasp; common-sense notions of right / wrong Consequentialist orientation: Argues that the outcomes, results, ends are more important than “intention” The morality of an action is a function of what follows from it Object (X) is good if it has good consequences; bad if it has bad consequences… The Principle of Utility Hedonism The Disinterested and Benevolent Spectator It is NOT THAT SIMPLE! We need to observe other valuable criteria…

The Principle of Utility The “greatest happiness principle” The right choice/action is the one that results in the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Public Policy War But…what do we mean by “happiness”!

Hedonismbot - Futurama Mill: “By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure.” Principle: Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain. Mill: only pleasure itself, or the absence of pain is to be considered good in itself… Mill: everything else that is called good is only good insofar as it leads to pleasure. Hedonism: the notion that pleasure is the only good that exists. Mill: there are various types of pleasure, and some are superior to others. They differ by: Duration, intensity and kind. “Those who have tasted the higher pleasures will never set them aside to pursue the lower ones, even if their attainment is more difficult.” Hedonismbot - Futurama Modern use of “hedonism”: a pleasure-seeker…with a ravenous desire for bodily or sensual pleasures (food, sex); a depraved creature who neglects the higher goods in life and merely seeks the instant gratification of his basest desires. While this is NOT the use of the word that Mill intends, he does recognize that this type of hedonistic expression exists…as a base level of pleasure (good)

The Disinterested and Benevolent Spectator So far: “The utilitarian not only seeks to produce the greatest amount of pleasure for the greatest number of people, but also the highest kinds of pleasure for the greatest number of people.” This demands an ethical concern for others, outside of one’s own self-interests. requires the subordination of one’s own happiness for the good of the whole. Mill: “A true utilitarian should be as strictly impartial as a disinterested and benevolent spectator.” Act like a person of good will who is not connected to the situation. This means: When evaluating various choices that one has been given in a situation, the moral agent should give equal consideration to each person effected by this decision, including himself. No special consideration given to ourselves or our loved ones. The happiness of each person should be given the same weight.

Utilitarianism After Mill Other Util. Considerations? Common Agreement / Utilitarians: There are different ways to define happiness. There are arguments about what constitutes good-ness. There is a basic rejection of hedonism (pleasure principle) as the defining premise of “happiness” and “good-ness” Additional goods should be considered. There are (arguably) different orders of goods. Only “intrinsic goods” should be taken into account when evaluating the morality of an action. In order to determine the morality of an act, one must “measure” the amount of good the act will produce, and subtract from this the amount of evil it will produce. The net result is the “utility” of the act. Use of Principle of Utility is a fundamental mechanism.

Utilitarianism and Kant Kantian The consequences of an action are the (only) morally relevant factor in any situation. There are situations where treating someone as a means to an end is acceptable, for the good of the whole. Our action can be justified as morally good if it results in the greatest amount of good for the most people. Do not believe consequences of an action have any moral relevance whatsoever. No one may ever be treated simply as a means (to an end) regardless of the (good) consequences it may bring. It is our actions or intentions that are right or wrong, regardless of what happens to result from them.

Utilitarianism and Christianity Mill: Utilitarianism is the perfection of the Golden Rule; Can the utilitarian take the bad with the good if his number is called? Consequences are the only factors to consider. Can justify an evil act; no such thing as an act evil in itself. People can be used as a means to a greater good for greater number; some lives are expendable. Christianity: No, it is not (uses person as means to an end); this is not the same as “love your neighbor as you love yourself”. Consequences are important factors, but not the only factors; objects and intentions are important too. Cannot justify an evil act using only consequences; some actions are categorically wrong. People have inherent dignity and value. Goal is to protect and uphold this. Credit should be extended to Util. for its concern for the welfare of society and its effort to secure the common good