CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for NOAA’s Climate Interests
Advertisements

Navigating Risk, Challenge and Opportunity Promise of the Arctic, Seattle, WA Drummond Fraser Transport Canada, Marine Safety & Security May 29, 2013.
Seventh framework programme CAPACITIES specific programme Activities of international cooperation Coordination Support Action - Grant agreement no.:
First Marine Board Forum – 15 May Oostende Marine Data Challenges: from Observation to Information From observation to data.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
Weather, Water, Climate Services Supporting Sustainable Development Jerry Lengoasa Deputy Director General Oslo, May 2014 World Meteorological.
Inuit Circumpolar Council Climate change, food security and Inuit Kirt Ejesiak Vice president, ICC Canada.
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
SEARCH AGU Town Hall Meeting: Community Input on Activities & Directions Hajo Eicken Chair, SEARCH Science Steering Committee.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Synthesis of Breakout Sessions Conclusions, Recommendations, Actions.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
Setting the Stage: The Imperatives of Capacity Development, Scientific Monitoring, and Public Education Hiroshi Terashima President Ocean Policy Research.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
© GEO Secretariat AmeriGEOSS Initiative Plenary Presentation AmeriGEOSS Initiative Working Groups November 9, 2015, GEO-XII 1.
Setting the Stage: The Imperatives of Capacity Development, Scientific Monitoring, and Public Education Hiroshi Terashima President Ocean Policy Research.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Task of GEO for Oceans Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Task of GEO for Oceans Trevor Platt.
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
State of the Global Change Grand Challenge Report to the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology 15 September 2010.
Group on Earth Observations (GEO) Cold Regions Work Plan Item WA-01-C3 Barbara J. Ryan Secretariat Director Lanzhou, China 13 March 2013 EC Panel of Experts.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability photos:
Launched March at UN Statistical Commission in side event.
UNESCO Bangkok, Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
OGC Interoperability Program Arctic Spatial Data Pilot
AmeriGEOSS Regional Initiative A framework that seeks to promote collaboration and coordination among the GEO Members of the American Continent Angelica.
The US Arctic Observing Network Office A first follower?
National Ocean Council Regional Planning Body Overview
Agenda item 7: Draft NOWPAP
The EU Polar research strategy
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
INTAROS WP5 Data integration and management
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
Essential Biodiversity Variables: towards an agreement on a common approach for biodiversity Rob Jongman, Wageningen UR Henrique Pereira, University of.
The Arctic Observing Summit
Elmer Topp-Jørgensen, Aarhus University, Denmark
SAON Committee on Observations and Networks (SAON CON)
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
WORLD CLIMATE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
CLIVAR/WCRP Issues Imperatives WCRP Restructuring
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Regional scale Initiatives
SIT Chair Priorities and SIT-33 Objectives
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
International Partners
7th EU Research FP has ten themes defined in order:
United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries
The Big picture – Sustainable COASTAL FISHERIES management
Cape Town, South Africa, November 2017
Freshwater from Space Discussion -Next Steps
(Arkhangelsk, Russia, 26 May 2019)
Sandy Starkweather (NOAA), U.S. AON Executive Director
The value cycle discovery-translation-application
The Arctic Observing Summit is SAON’s oureach event
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Framework for Ocean Observing
Input to the SAON Roadmap work based on work done in INTAROS where observing systems are assessed according to scientific themes Stein Sandven, NERSC.
The Technology Mechanism of the UNFCCC
Session 2 Discussion CEOS 2019 SIT Technical Workshop
Presentation transcript:

CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives • SAON Roadmap for Arctic Observing • Food Security Working Group • Arctic Observing Summit 2020 Hajo Eicken – International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA, heicken@alaska.edu Sandy Starkweather – U.S. Arctic Observing Network, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA, sandy.starkweather@noaa.gov

SAON • Sustained Arctic observations provide shared benefits to Arctic & non-Arctic countries • Collaborative approaches to sustained observations require processes and capacity to support convergence towards a common observing framework • SAON has emerged as the de facto governance body under IASC and Arctic Council to provide an inclusive environment within which to establish such a framework • SAON’s vision is for a connected, collaborative, and comprehensive long-term pan- Arctic Observing System that serves societal needs. • How do we move from a vision to specific action?

Supporting SAON’s Roadmap for Arctic Observing and Data Systems (ROADS) SAON has identified the development of this Road Map as essential to generating strong national investments in coordinated international Arctic observing, through confidently and coherently presenting the imperative observing foci, a strategy for observing them that leverages existing efforts and interests, supported by a value assessment of observing outputs towards societal benefit.

Achieving SAON/ASM/AOS goals Broad range of themes, interests, mandates, concepts, champions Assessment (“Knowledge map”) Arctic Observing Roadmap • Parsing & synthesis • Ranking • Linking • Co-design/imple-mentation/integration of observing system components • Well-defined requirements for EVs • Societal benefits (shared) Bundling of efforts insufficient  Development of coherent set of observations drawing on requirements guided by shared benefits Identify commonalities & link requirements & implementation across narrow efforts that fit into common thematic framework

ROADS Charge: Develop a high-level, structural definition for the SAON ROADS that will serve to generate strong international investments in Arctic observing Define how Arctic Societal Benefit Areas or other objectives should be used to shape ROADS

Societal Benefit Areas (SBA’S) and economic benefits tied to Arctic observing Disaster Preparedness Environmental Quality Food Security Fundamental Understanding of Arctic Systems Human Health Infrastructure and Operations Marine & Coastal Ecosystems & Processes Natural Resources Resilient Communities Sociocultural Services Terrestrial & Freshwater Ecosystems & Processes Weather and Climate SAON & IDA STPI (2017) Value Tree Analysis also: • Strahlendorff et al. (2019) – Finland • Japan – in prep. Dobricic et al. (2018) Economic benefits of Arctic observing systems; EU Horizon 2020

ROADS Approach (in Review): Essential Arctic Variables (EAV’s) Conceptually broad, phenomenological observing categories (e.g. “sea ice”) that provide a structured interface for coordination and collaboration in support of societal benefit. Identified for their criticality to achieving Arctic societal benefit Defined by their observing system requirements (e.g. spatial resolution, frequency, coverage, accuracy), which are technology-neutral and should transcend specific observing strategies, programs or regions. Implemented through specific recommendations based on best available technology and practices. A holistic and collaborative observing system of EAV’s is achieved through employing consistent strategies in identifying, linking and developing requirements for sampling. The EAV approach allows for progress on implementation, under an expectation of continuous innovation in the underlying technologies.

EAV definition, observing requirements & implementation: Indigenous Food Security as a focusing theme Inuit Circumpolar Council’s Food Security Lens: Availability Inuit culture Decision-making power and management Health and wellness Stability Accessibility Transformative Arctic change in a global (food security) context: Shifts in fish stocks & ecosystem change – Central Arctic Ocean (CAO) agreement Increasing maritime activities Arctic – Mid-latitude linkages

Linking Arctic Value to Global Variables US AON Value Tree “SEA ICE” is one variable in the Global Ocean Observing System Essential Ocean Variable Framework GOOS Essential Ocean Variables Observing System SUB Variable Essential Ocean Variable

Linking Arctic Value to Global Variables: Drilling into specifics – food security & maritime operations

Next steps and connections Arctic Observing Summit 2020 Arctic Food Security signature observing/prediction product suite (GEOGLAM as model to aspire to) New satellite observation data products, e.g.: Marine biological production Harmful algal blooms Sea ice supporting functions … Linking Arctic activities into global frameworks and networks (GEO, GOOS, etc.)

2020 Arctic Observing Summit: Observing for Action Akureyri, Iceland 30 Mar – 2 Apr 2020 Summit themes Design, Optimization and Implementation Observing in Support of Adaptation and Mitigation Observing in Support of Global Action Data Interoperability and Federated Search Indigenous Needs