Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Structural Analysis of the Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel β Subunit Functional Core and Its Complex with the α1 Interaction Domain  Yarden Opatowsky,
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Stefan T Arold, Maria K Hoellerer, Martin E.M Noble  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1207-1217 (October 2003) Molecular Recognition of Paxillin LD Motifs by the Focal Adhesion Targeting Domain  Maria K. Hoellerer, Martin E.M. Noble, Gilles Labesse, Iain D. Campbell, Jörn M. Werner, Stefan T. Arold  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1207-1217 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010

Figure 1 Sequences and Binding Partners of LD Motifs (A) Alignment of LD motifs from paxillin, E6AP, and ERC-55. The LD2 and LD4 sequences used in this study are shaded in gray. Underlined residues are predicted (by PhD at www.expasy.org) to form an α helix. In agreement with the solution structure of LD2 (Liu et al., 2002), the helix of LD2 is predicted to continue until Q156. For LD4, the helical conformation is predicted to continue until Q281. (B) Specificity, (predicted) fold, and location of LD binding (sub)domains. LD binding experiments are compiled from references (Chen et al., 1995; Nikolopoulos and Turner, 2000, 2001; Tong et al., 1997; Turner et al., 1999). Folds marked with an asterisk are as predicted by homology modeling and sequence analysis. Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 2 Refined LD Peptides in their Unbiased 3Fo-2Fc Electron Density Maps Maps were calculated using CNS and contoured at 0.9 σ. (A) LD4 peptide (ball-and-stick representation) bound to FAT site 1-4 (ribbon presentation); (B) LD4 peptide bound to site 2-3; (C) LD2 peptide bound to site 1-4; (D) LD2 peptide bound to site 2-3. Figure prepared with Aesop (M.E.M.N., unpublished data). Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 3 The Interaction between FAT and LD Motifs Underlined labels refer to LD peptides (ball-and-stick models). Surface representations of FAT domains are colored according to blue, basic; red, acidic; green, hydrophobic. (A) LD2 and (B) LD4 peptides bound to FAT helices 1-4 (left panel) and 2-3 (right panel). Figure prepared with Aesop (M.E.M. Noble, unpublished data). Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 4 Chemical Shift and D2O Exchange Data for FATP in Solution (A) Weighted combined 1H-15N chemical shift perturbation of FATP in the presence of three times molar excess of LD4: Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 4 Chemical Shift and D2O Exchange Data for FATP in Solution (A) Weighted combined 1H-15N chemical shift perturbation of FATP in the presence of three times molar excess of LD4: Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 5 Definition of the LD4 Binding Sites in Solution by Mapping the NMR Data on the Structure of FATP Each of the four faces of the FAT bundle is related by a 90° rotation around the long axis of FAT. FATP is shown in a ribbon, and LD4 in a stick representation. Residues with a significantly perturbed combined chemical shift are colored in green (Δδ > 0.08 ppm: pale green; Δδ > 0.2 ppm: fully saturated green). Residues with an increased or maximal protection of amide exchange in the presence of LD4 are shown in blue. Residues that meet both of the above criteria are shown in red. Unassigned residues are colored black. Figure prepared with Aesop (M.E.M.N., unpublished data). Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 6 Analysis of Potentially FAT-like LD Binding Domains (A) Sequence comparison of LD binding domains that (potentially) adopt a FAT-like fold. The C-terminal domains of FAK and vinculin were aligned based on their crystal structures. Secondary structure features of FAT are indicated. FAT residues marked with a “plus” or “minus” constitute LD binding site 1-4 or 2-3, respectively. Strictly conserved residues are highlighted in black. (B) Proposed molecular architecture of LD binding sites for vinculin (Vt) and p95PKL. Surface representations of the domains are colored according to blue, basic; red, acidic; green, hydrophobic. Figure prepared with Aesop (M.E.M.N., unpublished data). Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)

Figure 7 Model of the FAT Domain Bound to Two LD Motifs Ribbon representation of FAT is color ramped from the N terminus (blue) to the C terminus (red). Positions of the LD peptides (pink) were taken from molecule A (site 1-4) and molecule B (site 2-3) of dataset FAT:LD4-2 (see Table 1). Side chains of FAT Y925 and of positions “L” and “D” of the LD motifs are shown. Figure prepared with Aesop (M.E.M.N., unpublished data). Structure 2003 11, 1207-1217DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.08.010)