Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Advertisements

Figure 3 Doctors leaving (Matthews, 2013, p.13.)
Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Qualitative analysis—themes and subthemes regarding detention minimisation Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability
Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.
Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...
Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.
bDMARD: biologic DMARD.
Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
RCTs: randomized controlled ...
Fig. 1 Graphical representation of improving mortality in stroke patients since the inception of a national stroke ... “Graph courtesy of George Dunn,
Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.
Figure 1. Historical dialectic framework to assess transnational advocacy network influence Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants screened, enrolled and followed-up between 1 July 2015 and 31 May Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants.
Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs
Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.
Figure 1. Results of search based on the PRISMA statement.14
Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.
Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion of daptomycin resistance of isolate 5 passaged in vitro. This figure ... Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion.
Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Topics of debate reported by respondents (n = 77)
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1. Data access using HMP16SData
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.
Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1. Flowchart detailing exclusions of fetal death and livebirth records obtained from Texas Department of State ... Figure 1. Flowchart detailing.
FIGURE 1 Major activities in the working week of a banker
FIGURE 1 Weight loss for participants (n = 128) who consumed the high-egg (n = 66) or the low-egg (n = 62) diets ... FIGURE 1 Weight loss for participants.
Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.
Figure 1 Patient selection.
Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of AAV in three clinically relevant disease categories defined by clinical ... Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of.
Figure 3. Key words and phrases from narrative text by classification category. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to.
Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.
Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories
Figure 1: Yearly net investment flows from Japan
Figure 1 Strategies for reconciling protection and participation.
Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.
Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.
Figure 1. Parenting Evaluations by Parenting Style, Education, and Vignette Parent Gender. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2
Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.
Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.
Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA
Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with child marrying someone from their own party. All estimates adjusted using probability weights. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 82, Issue 2, 14 May 2018, Pages 379–390, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. Subjects who are affectively polarized by partisan strength and treatment. All estimates adjusted using ... Figure 2. Subjects who are affectively polarized by partisan strength and treatment. All estimates adjusted using probability weights. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 82, Issue 2, 14 May 2018, Pages 379–390, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3. Polarization effects by partisan strength and treatment Figure 3. Polarization effects by partisan strength and treatment. Predicted probabilities calculated using values in ... Figure 3. Polarization effects by partisan strength and treatment. Predicted probabilities calculated using values in table 1. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 82, Issue 2, 14 May 2018, Pages 379–390, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.