MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Advertisements

Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Status of MEIC Beam Synchronization V.S. Morozov on behalf of MEIC study group (summary of the results of a series of special MEIC R&D meetings) MEIC Collaboration.
JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Design and Polarization
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Electron Ring Optics Design
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
CEPC advanced partial double ring scheme
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
RHIC Magnets for JLEIC Yuhong Zhang May 11, 2018.
MEIC Shifting Magnet Tim Michalski August 6, 2015.
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Transfer Line for EIC.
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Synchronization in MEIC
Deuteron and Small Aperture
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Non-pairwise Collision
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Cavity tuning options for synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
New Chicane Option Total bending angle and start and end points fixed
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
Ion Path Length Compensation with Chicane
200GeV JLEIC circumferences
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Illustrations of Beam Synchronization Issue
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines J. Guo

MEIC Sync Options Revisit If “gear switch” is allowed: Each half of e-ring path (from IP to IP) length changes continuously in the range of 0-31.5cm (total range 0-63cm) Yuhong/Vasily have a chicane design Keep e-ring harmonic constant (3416 for 476MHz), jump ion ring harmonic number by 2 (from 6832 to 6848); adjust RF frequency by ±1.5×10-4. Two IPs for 952MHz e-ring, lose one IP at certain ion energies for 476 e-ring when i-ring harmonic number is 4N+2 (such as 6834, 6838, etc). If “gear switch” is not allowed: Keep e-ring to i-ring harmonic ratio constant at 1:2 (or 1:1 after e-ring 952 upgrade), jump i-ring harmonic by 2 (from 6832 to 6848), adjust RF frequency by ±1.5×10-4 Requires change half of e-ring path in range of 0-2.8m, total 0-5.6m, for 12-100GeV/u ions Use Yuhong/Vasily’s chicane for 2X 0~31.5cm continuous change, plus 2X(8X31.5cm) discrete path changes using bypass lines, totally 0-5.67m continuous range The bypass lines can be installed after the 1st run of MEIC, during which we can experimentally confirm whether gear switch is allowed or not.

(29m longer than regular straight) Bypass Line Design 31.24m (29m longer than regular straight) 4.96m Line 4 3 2 1 Bending magnet 4, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4 Total length ~90m Assumes 2.2m between B-mags except for the long straights 110.5m bend radius (to keep SR same) and 5.4m B-mag length, 2.8° bending angle for the ring B-mags Bypass line B-mags and switch mags have same 5.4m length but different bending angle and sagitta Beam path width at B4 exit: ~25cm Improvement and optimization needed. Line # B4 bending Angle (°) Change in path length (m) Mag 1-3 bending angle Δx max (m) Long straight length (m) 2.8 31.24 1 0.315 2.14 2*16.88 2 0.74 0.63 3.49 3.23 2*17.04 3 -0.97 0.945 4.06 4.15 2*17.19 4 -2.47 1.26 4.56 4.96 2*17.35 Line 2-4 are likely to operate at lower electron energy, so smaller bending radius is allowed without higher max energy loss per turn and emittance. Need to confirm with physics.

Bypass I Bypass II Bypass III Bypass IV e- R=155m RF Spin rotator CCB Arc, 261.7 81.7 IP Tune trombone & Straight FODOs Future 2nd IP Bypass III Bypass IV 4 bypasses in 4 quadrants, can turn on by pair, minimum change 2*0.315m=0.63m, max change 4*4*0.315=5.04m (5.67m including the 2*0.315m chicane, good for 11.9 GeV/u ion) To reduce the number of bends, We only need line 0, 4 in bypass III and IV. Or we can build line 0, 1, 3, 4 in bypass I, II and line 0, 4 in III, IV to make the bends less crowded. Need 60 additional bends (31% of original arc) , including 8 switching bend (wider). Can be staged. Total arc length 116m (~8%) longer, ~5% of circumference, if we keep the bending radius the same. If the bypasses are right next to the spin rotators, it will reduce the length of the long straights, so the total circumference will increase less than 116m; if the bypasses are located close to the center of arcs, it will significantly increase the length of the long straights and the circumference.

Ion Energy range (GeV/u) Path length change range (m) Use of bypass lines at different ion energy, no gear switch Ion Energy range (GeV/u) Line in bypass Path length change range (m) Harmonic Number I II III IV E-ring I-ring 35.26-100 0-0.63 3416 6832 25.53-35.26 1 0.63-1.26 3417 6834 20.93-25.53 2 1.26-1.89 3418 6836 18.12-25.53 3 1.89-2.52 3419 6838 16.17-18.12 4 2.52-3.15 3420 6840 14.72-16.17 3.15-3.78 3421 6842 13.59-14.72 3.78-4.41 3422 6844 12.67-13.59 4.41-5.04 3423 6846 11.9-12.67 5.04-5.67 3424 6848

Ion Energy range (GeV/u) Path length change range (m) Non-pair-wise collision (one ion bunch collides with all electron bunches), two IPs Ion Energy range (GeV/u) Line in bypass Path length change range (m) Harmonic Number I II III IV E-ring I-ring 35.26-100 2 0.63-1.26 3417 6832 25.53-35.26 1 3 1.26-1.89 3418 6834 20.93-25.53 4 1.89-2.52 3419 6836 18.12-25.53 2.52-3.15 3420 6838 16.17-18.12 3.15-3.78 3421 6840 14.72-16.17 3.78-4.41 3422 6842 13.59-14.72 4.41-5.04 3423 6844