HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
Highlights of the ATS MD part I (injection and ramp) … An 8h video game party carefully organized by Jorg et al. 1S. Fartoukh, LSWG 24/05/2011.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Updates to WISE for LHC run II Per Hagen May 2015.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Review of FCC-hh optics & beam dynamics IPNO, Orsay, Paris November 2015 Reviewers: S. Fartoukh (CERN), O. Napoly (CEA), E. Todesco (CERN), F. Zimmermann.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
1 Task particle simulations studies: progress report M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Blind area specification from Doros MD
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Alignment and beam-based correction
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
Ion Commissioning: Thursday & Friday
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Alignment of VSC components along LSS 1&5
HL-LHC Aperture Update
Orbit correction status and update for HL-LHC
Field quality update and recent tracking results
IP, crab cavity alignment and orbit control
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Optics and operational modes for the HL-LHC
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Asynchronous free ATS optics for LHC & HL-LHC S. Fartoukh, BE-ABP
Machine lay-out September 2015
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
Alternative design of the matching section for crab-cavity operation
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
R. De Maria, D. Gamba, F. Plassard
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Crab cavity voltage in HL1.3
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Crab crossing plan Optimize the crabbing system for best beam stability and minimum emittance impact Study and specify tolerances on cavity multipole components.
Measurement of the beam (transverse) emittances
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Michele Martino – Jean-Paul Burnet
L. Gentini, M. Giovannozzi, M. Gonzalez, M. Krupa, H. Mainaud Durand,
Presentation transcript:

HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018

Layout changes HLLHCV1.3 HLLHCV1.4 Q5 MQY B1(E) B2(I) Q4 C D2 MBRD Q1 Q2a HV Q3 Q2b CP D1 1.9K 1.9 K MCBXFB MCBXFA MCBRD MCBY IP HLLHCV1.4 H V Q5 MQML B1(E) B2(I) Q4 MQY C D2 MBRD Q1 Q2a HV Q3 Q2b CP D1 1.9K 1.9 K 4.5 K MCBXFB MCBXFA MCBRD MCBY MCBC IP Changes with respect to the baseline: Q4: reusing existing cold mass (3 correctors instead of 4), no need of 1.9 K. Q5: reusing existing Q5 cold mass (1 corrector instead of 3), no need of 1.9 K. Full deployment of remote alignment system to be used with safe beam.

Changes HLLHC1.3 → 1.4 Layout (IR1/5 when not specified): 2+2 crab cavities → 2 crab cavities only Q4: 4xMCBY+MQY 1.9K → 3xMCBY+MQY 4.5 K Q5: 3xMCBY+MQY 1.9K → 1xMCBC+MQML 4.5 Q4, Q5 displaced towards the arc from 10.047 m, 11 m w.r.t LHC to 10.5 m w.r.t LHC Remote alignment system (i.e. machine can be realigned during beam commissioning) Extended D1 beam-screen New specification for TCTPV-TCTPH-TCLX stroke and apertures Changes length/position of correctors in CP IR7: MBH+TCLD, MQW (not the absorber) IR2: TCLD, TDIS IR8: TANB Missing: Final positions of correctors in CP Comparison with mechanical drawings Agreement on design/nominal magnetic length on drawings Possible displacement BPM from IP side D2 to arc side Small change MCBRD positions

Changes HLLHC1.3 → 1.4 Optics: Crossing bumps re-optimized thanks to remote alignment system Dedicated optics for 7 TeV (using 7.5 TeV equivalent currents where needed) IR4 optimized for instrumentation and e-lens IR6 reviewed and re-optimized for TCDQ gaps, Q5 strengths IR8 β*=1.5 m New aperture estimates thanks to remote alignment system Decision on crossing plane for Point 1/5 Squeeze sequence with/without ATS in the ramp Update MS10 branch and follow-up of the DA studies. Optics optimization for forward physics. Repository: Move LS2 changes from HL-LHC to RunIII repository Error tables, macros and script (e.g.. CP update)

IR4 optics actions from BI Follow-up from 115th WP2 meeting: Use improved injection optics without optics change during the ramp (for the time being) Increase the minimum beta at the BSRT above 200 m while keeping the beta at HEL bigger than 250 m. Reduce β-ratio between for Shottky monitors Study reducing the aperture of the HEL (below 50 mm) Optics parameters should be estimated at the location of BGV and new BSRT using the light from D4 Implications of the issue with imbalance of currents on Q8.L4.B1 Review BQK Provide dispersion correction in IR4 (on-going)

IR4 Injection Optics: 1.3 -> 1.4 HL1.3 HL1.4 Increased beta and rounded in B1, more round in B2. No optics transitions to enhance β further.

Round optics transition ATS scaling factor 1 → 0.3 to squeeze Point 5: β* : 50 cm → 15 cm during levelling β* : 2 m → 60 cm during ramp&squeeze

Instrumentation Markers Label Beam 1 At [m] Beam 2 e-lens ELENS.5L4.B1 -40.000 ELENS.5R4.B2 40.000 BSRTD3 MU.A5R4.B1 45.701 MU.A5L4.B2 -45.561 BSRTD4 BSRTD4.5L4.B1 -117.114 BSRTD4.5R4.B2 117.114 BGI BGIH.5L4.B1 -64.186 BGIH.5R4.B2 64.186 WS BWS.5R4.B1 84.876 BWS.5L4.B2 -84.876 BQSH BQSH.7R4.B1 174.902 BQSH.5R4.B2 114.409 BQSV BQSV.5R4.B1 116.109 BQSV.7R4.B2 176.702 BPLH1 BPLH.A6R4.B1 163.088 BPLH.6R4.B2 136.952 BPLH2 BPLH.7R4.B1 177.952 BPLH.A7L4.B2 -173.952 BPLV BPLV.B6R4.B1 138.552 BPLV.B5L4.B2 -116.559 BQLV2 - BPLV.7R4.B2 178.752 BPLX BPLX.H6R4.B1 149.662 BPLX.D6R4.B2 148.872 BGV BGV.7R4.B1 200.000 BGV.7L4.B2 -200.000 MKQ MKQA.6L4.B1 -150.137 MKQA.6L4.B2 -152.337

New IR4: Values Flat 30/7.5 cm and 18/7.5 cm optics are also possible. βxB1/βyB1 βxB2/βyB2[m] Pos. HLLHC 1.4 Injection LHC 1.4 Round 15cm e-lens D3 280/280/280/280 BSRTD3 206/351/206/384 BSRTD4 D4 410/264/410/239 BGI D3-4 314/270/314/262 WS 197/402/197/453 BQSH Q5-7 577/ 58/405/240 504/119/405/240 BQSV 201/451/123/507 201/451/ 61/584 BPLH1 544/117/396/270 472/173/384/278 BPLH2 544/ 51/479/168 482/114/479/169 BPLV 260/389/201/517 250/408/201/517 BQLV2 / /123/484 / / 58/555 BPLX 375/245/279/372 341/288/242/407 BGV 332/ 24/266/162 339/ 87/267/163 MKQ 286/418/356/320 284/421/355/321 Flat 30/7.5 cm and 18/7.5 cm optics are also possible.

IR4 HLLHCV1.4: Injection to squeeze optics Squeezed round Constant optics from Q5 to Q5. Right part important optics changes due to ATS

IR4 HLLHCV1.4: Injection to squeeze optics Squeezed round Optics transitions can occur during the squeeze at flat top or during the ramp&squeeze depending on the operational scenario.

IR4 HLLHCV1.4: Injection to squeeze optics

Transitions

New IR4 Injection Optics Aperture at injection above the target of 12.6 σ using HL-LHC aperture tolerances. Aperture margin for e-lens available, to be evaluate with detailed drawings

IR4 optics has been updated with larger beta Conclusion IR4 optics has been updated with larger beta A detailed optics transition shows stable and unstable optics locations. Iteration needed to find optimal location of each instrument. Next step: Review IP1/5 instrumentation phase advances