Teaching a Course on Positive Relationships

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting to the Heart of Assessment & Evaluation
Advertisements

Introduction to Coaching and Mentoring
Start Smart Stay Safe. Calgary Police Service Calgary Catholic School District Calgary Board of Education Mount Royal University Centre for Child Well.
Appreciative Inquiry The 4-D Process COS 4850 From: Whitney & Trosten-Bloom (2003) The Power of Appreciative Inquiry Berrett-Koehler.
BBA Electives Management & Organizations Department.
Christian Studies in the Real World Vicki Schilling Lutheran Education Queensland.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Growing Innovations in Rural Sites of Learning: Learning Together Elluminate meeting #2 – December, 2011.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (LOB) faculty offer different types of electives Electives that fulfill the 2 nd year Leadership Requirement (LDSP)
Module 2 Planning an Integrated Common Core Literature Lesson.
Student Leadership By: Rhys Andrews. Why a Focus on Student Leadership? Tomorrows leaders will be you We can help prepare you for leadership challenges.
Ward Sister/Charge Nurse Support & Enablement Programme WSCNTL 2014, Kings Hall Leading Care, Leading Teams - Innovating and Supporting Person-Centred.
Powerful Coaching- OCAMP Mentor Training Day 3 November 2011.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
Time for The Big Think David V. Loertscher & Carol Koechlin.
ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Hosted By: Janice Case NASSP Consultant Building Connections Among Principal, Counselor, and Students presented by Judith Richardson & Virginia Minshew.
A year in the life of a team coach Joanne James Head of Corporate and Executive Development Newcastle Business School.
MY TIME, OUR PLACE Framework for School Age Care In Australia Prepared by: Children’s Services Central April 2012 Team Meeting Package.
Collaborating and Mentoring Competency 009: G-1 By Adriana G. Hernandez Spring 2012.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3
Good teaching for diverse learners
21st Century Pilot for System Learning
The Advising First College Life Coaching Program
Doctoral Program Orientation
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Design Thinking for the innovative OT
February 8, 2017.
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
The 32nd Forum for Behavioral Science in Family Medicine
Agenda for L :15 Start Trying a tool: cocktail party
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Organization and Knowledge Management
Magothy River Middle School
The importance of emotional learning within communication between the staff Project Number: RO01-KA
Progress from Urban Planning Department on Work Supported by CTE
Facilitation guide for Building Team EQ skills.
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Senior Physical Education
NHS Education for Scotland Always Event Project
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
Distance Learning Facilitator Skills
MH31 Principles of interviewing and group leadership
Effective Learning Environment Video
Teaching as Inquiry 2017:  We are evaluators. We assess our impact.
CFP Board mentor Program: mentee Kit
cultureQs Accelerating Change through Stakeholder Engagement
Applying Critical Thinking in Child Welfare
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Your own solution. The solution for others.
THE EXPERIENCE OF ENGINEERS LEADING PROJECT TEAMS: A GENERIC QUALITATIVE INQUIRY Halle Horvath.
G L A M Gameful Medway Project
EMPOWERING REFLECTIVE & COLLABORATIVE TEAMS
Mentoring Novice Science Teachers
Collaborating with the media specialist
Internationalizing the Curriculum
MH31 Principles of interviewing and group leadership
Career Management.
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Providing Effective Feedback to Students
Building a Course with Emerging Technologies
CFP Board mentor Program: mentee Kit
Presentation transcript:

Teaching a Course on Positive Relationships Jane Dutton, Sally Maitlis and Arne Carlsen POS Research Conference June 5-6, 2019

Goals for Game plan our time together INSPIRATION PRACTICAL- RESOURCE RICH DIVERSITY OF PERSPECTIVES WHY? HOW ? (Topics, Materials, Assignments) DESIGN CHALLENGE Q AND A (Throughout) Jane do intro/overviw

Background Context: Who? How Long? Sally Arne Jane We each talk about what we do in teaching this

1. Why this course? Jane will talk about the goals from her perspective

Goals Enhance self-awareness about relationship-building Deepen knowledge/skills about building high-quality relationships Broaden capacity to deal with corrosive and challenging relationships Strengthen diagnostics for relational capabilities for organizations Explore relational aspects of leadership See applications beyond work Jane do

2. Core topics covered Sally will talk about the sequence of topics/modules she covers– using next slide

Possible Topic Sequence (JD & SM) Making the Case for focus on HQCs Strategies for Building HQCs A. Respectful Engagement B. Task Enabling C. Trusting D. Playing III. Challenges in Building HQCs (Power, Diversity/Difference. Technology, Distance) Dealing with Corrosive Connections Designing for HQCS– the Relational Organization Living Relationally – Being a Contribution Sally do

Another Possible Topic Sequence (AC) 1. Quality and energy in relations Affirmative bias Growth mindset 2. Experiential learning 3. Meaning making 4. Making space 5. Positive organizational change

3. Favorite materials-- Readings

JD Arne do this section

AC 1, Quality and energy in relations: High-quality connections; psychological safety; generative resistance/radical candor & liberating laughter. 2. Experiential learning: : Classics (Kolb) and more recent papers on reflexive practices; transition to topics in design thinking; punk production. 3. Meaning making: Prosocial motivation and giving behavior; callings, compassion; motivational framing and positive dramas. 4. Making space: Work space design; visualization & sketching; the use of artifacts & boundary objects. 5. Positive organizational change: The progress principle; small wins, self-efficacy & agency;a taste of appreciative inquiry.

SM

Favorite materials - Videos We each talk about one that we use and make point about videos allowing for discussion of embodied aspects of relationality

So many favorites– but if forced to pick one (JD) Touching Strangers (< 3 min. ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq 69EV5dMsU Themes Power of touch– almost instant What happens in connection? Why might this matter?

AC “So tell me … what is your philosophy of leadership? .. how you inspire your men to be better than they think they can be?” Snippets from semi-documentary movies, e.g. Invictus, When We Were Kings, Nicky’s family The 911 call on the bookkeeper in Atlanta who talked down a gunman Peak moments in creative interactions (own research) Also: NOT VIDEO, but live acting with professional actors taking direction from students (critical moments approach)

SM The Doctor Listening Empathy: The Human Connection Mo Cheeks & Natalie Gilbert SM

Favorite materials- Cases Sally will talk about the prima donna Stanford case

SM

LinkedIn: Example of Relational Selection Practice (JD) https://wdi- publishing.com/product/a- values-based-approach-to- candidate-selection-linkedin- intern-interviews/

4. Winner assignments Arne will lead here talking about the set of assignments that are about HQC experiments

A series of self-designed action experiments with log, feedback and plenary debriefing Home exam experiencing reflecting (in log) designing debriefing 1st gathering (Sep) 2nd gathering (Nov) 3rd gathering (Jan) 4th gathering (Feb) 5th gathering (Apr) 1st menu: Respectful engagement Generative resistance Liberating laughter Psychological safety 2nd menu: Reflective Self-Portrait Good deeds … 3rd menu: Beneficiary contact practices Appreciation practices … 4th menu: Making space Creative collaboration Focused training … AC

Building a tent blindfolded—the final simulation (JD) Teams-time pressure– don’t know it is a tent Essay assignment (like final exam) How would you characterize the quality of connections? How do you know? What facilitated and what enabled the building of HQCs? What difference did HQCs make?

Design challenge for you!

QUESTIONS?

RESOURCES New website on HQCshttps://www.highqconnections.com/ Teaching resources on POS website (e.g., old syllabus and teaching notes https://positiveorgs.bus.umich.edu/wp- content/uploads/Dutton_MO615.pdf)