External validation and comparison of multiple prognostic scores in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by Roni Shouval, Joshua A. Fein, Aniela Shouval, Ivetta Danylesko, Noga Shem-Tov, Maya Zlotnik, Ronit Yerushalmi, Avichai Shimoni, and Arnon Nagler BloodAdv Volume 3(12):1881-1890 June 25, 2019 © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology

Roni Shouval et al. Blood Adv 2019;3:1881-1890 © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology

Distribution of the individual scores across the population. Distribution of the individual scores across the population. (A-F) Median (IQR) and number of patients per grouped stratum are provided. Scores tend to have a left (ie, favorable) bias. (F) Outliers in the EASIx score are shown in the inset. The Comorbidity-EBMT score is shown in the supplemental Appendix (supplemental Figure 1), and the distribution of the rDRI is provided in Table 1. Roni Shouval et al. Blood Adv 2019;3:1881-1890 © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology

Kaplan-Meier plots depicting the outcome of OS in each of the studied scores. Kaplan-Meier plots depicting the outcome of OS in each of the studied scores. (A-H) Increasing strata generally reflect poorer outcome in each of the scores. Roni Shouval et al. Blood Adv 2019;3:1881-1890 © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology

AUC curve for each score at 100 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years posttransplantation. AUC curve for each score at 100 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years posttransplantation. AUCs for prediction of OS (A), NRM (B), and relapse (C) are depicted. Roni Shouval et al. Blood Adv 2019;3:1881-1890 © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology