LMS Transition to Canvas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SDSUs Tech T-UNU-P Web-Based Solutions Technology in the Classroom Technology in Distance Education.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance / Institutional Effectiveness and Course Syllabi Requirements of the Commission for Academic Accreditation UAE Ministry of Higher Education.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
August 9, 2005 UCCSC IT Security at the University of California A New Initiative Jacqueline Craig. Director of Policy Information Resources and.
TRAIN Policies An Overview Karen K. Ngowe, MA, MI-TRAIN Administrator Phone:
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
PAC Enhancement Project Presentation Core Team: Mr. Richard Chandler, Dr. Polly Hoover, Dr. Maria Jaskot-Inclan, Dr. Ileo Lott, Dr. Pervez Rahman, and.
MOODLE MAKEOVER Using Moodle for Staff Development.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
Academic Programs and Graduate Studies Office of Semester Conversion October 22, 2015 LI 2250 Get InFORMed: Support for Completing New Course Request Forms.
Working With the Instructional Development Team Presented by Heidi King 20 November 2002.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Promotion Equivalency Workshop. Overview What is a promotion equivalency? Who should pursue a promotion equivalency? What is a promotion equivalency plan?
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Ventura College Distance Education Program
Academic integrity at UB: Report & recommendations
“Redefined Roles of Applied Dissertation Chairs & Members”
Connecting the Dots to Create a Quality Map for Online Programs
Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Tracking Tenure and Promotion Using Your Talent Management System
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)
New Program Director Workshop
New Department Chair Workshop:
Faculty Senate Meeting September 20, 2016
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Online Teaching Conference
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
CIO Council User Experience Strategic Initiative Update
Recent Standards Changes and Revised Site Report Template
Defining an IT Workflow, from Request to Support
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Approval Criteria – Part II
The Home Base Professional Development Tool
Accessibility Updates
ABOUT STUDENTS REGIONAL CONSORTIUM Meeting Presentation March 14, 2016
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
Faculty Preparedness Online Student Services & Support
Curriculum Committee Orientation
Faculty Preparedness Online Student Services & Support
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Course Provisioning
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Faculty Governance at NU
Quality Matters Overview
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Learning Management Systems
NMDWS Internship Portal
Presentation transcript:

LMS Transition to Canvas LMS Use Guidelines 7/29/2019

LMS Use Guidelines Determine and propose the appropriate and allowable use of the Canvas LMS for Rutgers University Objective Proposal on the guidelines for the use of LMS Primary purpose of a Learning Management System for Rutgers University Allowable course types and/or use cases Governance or oversight process Exception process Common Glossary of Terms and Definitions Recommendations on alternative solutions Deliverable Lack of defined and enforced guidelines for the use of LMS systems have allowed the proliferation of non-traditional and non-academic implementations. Problem Statement

Agenda Learning Technology Glossary Course type definitions SC Recommendations for LMS Use Guidelines SC Recommendations for LMS Use governance/exceptions Next Steps

Learning Technology Glossary A collaborative document has been created and can be accessed at the following link for team members: Learning Techology Glossary.docx https://rutgersconnect.sharepoint.com/:w:/r/sites/oit/eas/pmo/LMS%20Transition/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B49485c7f-d3ff-48fb-8f32-95a311a3505b%7D&action=default&ct=1563192045284&or=OWA-NT&cid=8456e09d-cba0-4457-bb4d-6fa586d0f8aa

Use Guidelines - Considerations / Discussion Points Who is / are the target audience(s) for these guidelines? Chancellors, deans, directors and department chairs Faculty members Academic administrators LMS Technology support What types of courses are being delivered? (Brainstorm) Should courses delivered in Canvas be restricted to credit based instructional use only? NO Can Canvas courses be used for internal use only purposes? YES One-off courses? Should there be an exception process to gain approval on use? Yes, to be developed.  Should be consistent but handled at the school, departmental or program level. Should there be a governance or oversight process? Yes, to be developed.

Types of Courses Staff and Faculty training Student training/tutorial Onboarding / orientation Community Groups Demographically based sites for students (i.e. graduation) Continuous Education (credit and non-credit) Professional development Services/Courses Certificate programs MOOC (Massively Open Online Course) Active Learning Community Courses Compliance Training (RA training - student staff) Clinical rotation Assessments Student project sites Research sites Tenure tracking and promotion Accreditation Syllabi Repository Faculty forums Student governance RU Core reporting*

Proposed Guidelines Primary purpose of the Learning Management System is to enhance the student's learning experience A primary consideration for a request to use the LMS will be whether students are the audience An exception process will be in place for determination and approval of the LMS for use cases outside of the "official list" Besides the instructional use of the LMS, course and template development, and testing of content and materials in support of future courses is (encouraged) allowed Courses should be implemented with Canvas Out of the Box (OOTB) functionality, features and established 3rd party tools, else alternative solutions should be considered

Next Steps WG Review Period Additional SC Recommendations? Target date for deliverables – Draft shared by 8/2/19 Glossary Use Case Definitions LMS Use Guidelines Governance /Exeception Process WG Review Period feedback by 8/9/2019 (directly in document) Additional SC Recommendations? Sites that are on Canvas that don't meet guidelines? WG deliverable review period  No meeting 8/5/2019 / Final meeting 8/12/2019?

Governance - Proposed TLT to Chair meetings TLT to own and maintain guidelines, when appropriate will communicate updates Requests for exceptions to “approved” list of course types: Course Description Business Justification, including intended audience Review of alternative solutions available Intended interaction or functionality in LMS required Third party integrations required