Surveillance outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysms identified from a large screening program Kevin C. Chun, BS, Ashley S. Schmidt, BA, Sukhmine Bains, MD, Anthony T. Nguyen, BS, Kiana M. Samadzadeh, BS, Machelle D. Wilson, PhD, John H. Peters, MD, Eugene S. Lee, MD, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 55-61 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.059 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Fig Patient factors significantly associated with survival probability. The illustrations display the survival curves between survival probability and follow-up days after screening among follow-up scan type (top left), housing status (top right), age (bottom left), and estimated total median household income (bottom right). The number of patients per follow-up interval is shown at the bottom of each graph. Age and incomes (in thousands of dollars) are divided each into three ranges to better visualize distribution of data. Asst Liv, Assisted living; CT, computed tomography; FU, follow-up; Hm/Rt, homeowner/renter; lenfol, length of follow-up in days; Med House Income, estimated median household income. FU scan type graph: 0, no scan; 1, ultrasound; 2, CT scan. Housing status graph: 1, homeowner/renter; 2, assisted living. Age graph: 62, 54-69 years; 75, 70-79 years. Median household income graph: 31,000, $12,000-$49,000; 60,000, $50,000-$69,000. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 55-61DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.059) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions