Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception) prosthesis sensing and discrimination in an amputee. Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception)

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Experimental results for healthy participants.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Results from clothespin relocation test.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of.

Histograms showing the distribution of people with respect to their performances for the single task and multitask conditions. Histograms showing the distribution.

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Fig. 3 Affective responses by exchange condition (PR and RE), level of redistribution (0 = random, one-card, and two-card exchange), and outcome as winner.

Fig. 1 Proportions of normative beliefs by exchange condition, level of redistribution (0 = random, one-card, and two-card exchange), and outcome as winner.

Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Estimated response accuracy for critical pairs at the trial of testing

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Folding unit based on the plane symmetric Bricard linkage.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

In situ concurrent removal of MRSA bacteria and MRSA-secreting PFTs by RBC-PL-robots. In situ concurrent removal of MRSA bacteria and MRSA-secreting PFTs.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo.

Fig. 3 Avoidable fraction of heat-related deaths if the current trajectory warming of 3°C is brought down to the 1.5° or 2°C Paris Agreement thresholds.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Fig. 6 Stabilization of hippocampal signaling over sleep.

Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.

Fig. 4 Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal phyla across France. Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Robot-initiated joint attention.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Discrimination accuracy across conditions. Discrimination accuracy across conditions. (A) Mean accuracy of the adults for the critical and neutral trials across each experimental condition (control, n = 20; robot-peer, n = 20; human-peer, n = 20). During the critical trials, the presence of human peers leads to a significant decrease in discrimination accuracy due to subjects conforming to the human confederates. (B) Mean accuracy of the children during the discrimination task (control, n = 21; robot-peer, n = 22; no human-peer condition). During the critical trials, the presence of the robot peers leads to a significant decrease in accuracy due to group conformity. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean estimate; likelihood ratio test on logistic regression, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001. Anna-Lisa Vollmer et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat7111 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works