M. Jacques Nsuami, MD, MPH Stephanie N. Taylor, MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expanding and Improving STD Services during Resource Limited Times Heather James STD Field Services Supervisor Maricopa County STD Program.
Advertisements

The Need for Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening in School-Based Health Centers M Nsuami 1, SN Taylor 1, LS Sanders 1, TA Farley 2, DH Martin 1 1 Louisiana.
Repeat Infections among Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings From Philadelphia STD Clinics Nicole Liddon, PhD 1 Michael Eberhart, BS 2 Jami Leichliter,
Gonorrhea in Oklahoma Indian Country: Data and Challenges Cuyler Snider, MPH Epidemiologist Oklahoma City Area Inter-Tribal Health Board Tribal Epidemiology.
Assessing the Training Needs of Managed Care Providers: Implications for STD Clinical Training Targeting this Hard-to- Reach Group by the Eastern Quadrant.
STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.
Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.
Prevention and Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Persons Living with HIV/AIDS Partner Management.
Repeat Chlamydial Infections in Region III Family Planning Clinics: Implications for Screening Programs Pamela G. Nathanson, Family Planning Council, Inc.
DC American Academy of Pediatrics Adolescent Health Working Group Expedited Partner Therapy Fact Sheet Updated February 20, 2014 DC American Academy of.
Innovative STD Screening Projects in Indian Country Lori de Ravello, MPH CDC Assignee National STD Program Indian Health Service May 9, 2006.
Expedited Partner Therapy in Wisconsin STD Control Section Wisconsin Division of Public Health June 2010.
Screening and Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia as an HIV Prevention Strategy: Rationale and Implementation Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University.
Midwest AIDS Training & Education Center Health Care Education & Training, Inc. HIV/AIDS Case-Finding In Family Planning Clinics.
STD Testing Protocols, STD Testing, and Discussion of Sexual Behaviors in HIV Clinics in Los Angeles County Melanie M. Taylor MD, MPH Los Angeles County.
San Francisco Department of Public Health HIV Partner Services Update 2011 San Francisco STD Prevention and Control Services May 2011.
STEP UP: NYC DOHMH STD School Screening Progress Meighan Rogers, MPH IPP Region II Mtg December, 2007.
Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,
DHSTS April 28, 2014 Annual HIV Testing Project Coordinator’s Meeting.
STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco 2007—2010 STD Prevention and Control Services San Francisco Department of Public Health.
The Impact of Introducing “Express Visits” for Asymptomatic Persons Seeking STD Services in a Busy Urban STD Clinic System, Borrelli J 1, Paneth-Pollak.
Increasing the Efficiency of STI Clinics by Tailoring Services Based on a Risk Triage System Julie A. Subiadur, BSN, CCRC BC Brandy Mitchell, RN Dean McEwen.
STD Surveillance Network (SSuN) Cycle 2 Objectives Lori Newman & Kristen Mahle SSuN Principal Collaborators Meeting Atlanta, GA December 2, 2008.
High School STD Screening: Parental Consent and Confidentiality Meighan E. Rogers, MPH 2008 National STD Prevention Conference Chicago, IL March 11, 2008.
State and Local STD Prevention Programs Prepared by Jim Lee, Senior Public Health Advisor, Texas Department of State Health Services and Melinda Salmon,
Routine HIV Screening in Health Care Settings David Spach, MD Clinical Director Northwest AIDS Education and Training Center Professor of Medicine, Division.
GC Outbreak in Philadelphia Greta Anschuetz, MPH Philadelphia Department of Public Health
SSuN: MSM prevalence monitoring and HIV Testing in STD Clinics Kristen Mahle & Lori Newman SSuN Call #3 Oct 30, 2008.
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department National Coalition of STD Directors Phoenix,
HIV Testing in Medical Settings Mark Thrun, MD Denver Public Health
Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program Declining Disease Prevalence After 4 Years of Screening Lenore Asbel, Melinda Salmon, C. Victor Spain, Christa.
Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013 Division of STD Prevention.
NYC DOHMH BSTDC School-Based Education, Screening and Treatment Pilot Program Meighan Rogers, MPH Bureau of STD Control, NYC DOHMH Region II IPP Meeting,
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department.
Results from the School Health Policies and Practices Study 2012: How it relates to the work of state school nurse consultants Mary Vernon-Smiley, MD,
NAAT identified chlamydial infections: Enhanced sensitivity, reduced transmissibility? Presenter: Maria Villarroel, MA Authors: Maria A. Villarroel, MA.
IPP Infrastructure Measures of Effectiveness: Preliminary Data and Next Steps Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility Prevention Project Cicatelli.
Check Your Risk: Increasing School-Based STI Screening Participation Among District of Columbia High School Students Michelle Jasczyński, Ed.M. Public.
Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Milwaukee County Juvenile Detention Center Wendi Ehrman MD Milwaukee Adolescent Health Program Medical College of.
The Impact of Condom Distribution Programs on Teen Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Rates in Philadelphia, Anjani Parikh, MPH Centers for Disease Control.
Demographic and Behavioral Differences between Latino and non-Latino Patients Attending Baltimore City STD Clinics, Renee M. Gindi 1, Kathleen.
Developing and Improving a Fast Track Services Program in Chicago STD Clinics William Wong, MD Division of STD/HIV/AIDS Chicago Department of Public Health.
Meg Rosenberg, M.D., Montefiore School Health Program
Continuum of Surveillance Updates from Epidemiological Services New Jersey Department of Health Division of HIV, STD and TB Services (DHSTS) Annual.
The Weill Cornell Community Clinic Student Advisory Committee:
APHA Annual Meeting, November 2009
Chlamydia Screening in Tower Hamlets
STOP CHLAMYDIA PROGRAM
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2016 – December
It's not what you know, but who you know: Risk factors for re-infection in the Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program Jennifer Beck, MPH APHA.
Lenore Asbel, M.D. Greta L. Anschuetz Melinda Salmon
Results of Youth Satisfaction Survey Race distribution of patients
National STD Conference 2008
TB/HIV surveillance : Who is going to get the job done?
Martin Goldberg1, Daniel R. Newman2, TA Peterman2,
Gonorrhea Epidemiology and Control Efforts in Louisiana
Prevalence of Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Before and After Implementation of Routine Rectal Screening Ellen T. Rudy Sexually Transmitted Disease Program.
Accelerated Partner Therapy (APT) index patient and sex partner flow diagram, clinics A and B. (1) Number of clinic attenders diagnosed with chlamydia,
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
Poster THP 55; Contact: David Katz,
E-STD Prevention and Control
M Javanbakht, S Guerry, LV Smith, P Kerndt
Hepatitis Training in a STD Clinical Program
Conclusions/Implications
Promoting Sexual Health in NYS
Brett Harris, DrPH AMERSA Conference November 2-4, 2017
Finding Sex Partners On-Line: What’s the Risk for STI
Review of Recommendations for Partner Services
Role of HIV Partner Counseling & Referral Services (PCRS) in Identifying New HIV Infections among Partners to HIV Co-Infected Syphilis Cases Rilene A.
Screening Protocols and Education Charlotte A. Gaydos, MS, MPH, DrPH
Presentation transcript:

M. Jacques Nsuami, MD, MPH Stephanie N. Taylor, MD Treatment and Follow Up in School-Based Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Programs M. Jacques Nsuami, MD, MPH Stephanie N. Taylor, MD LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 9/16/2019

School and students’ participation in the New Orleans STD Screening Program # of Schools Tested Chlamydia Gonorrhea 1995-1996 Fall 3 1662 106   Spring 627 33 1996-1997 1721 71 28 1375 55 23 1997-1998 8 3851 325 61 1998-1999 12 6020 464 119 1999-2000 13 6080 578 2000-2001 2869 355 93 2001-2002 3069 346 66 2002-2003 7 2235 274 67 2003-2004 2229 285 53 2004-2005 9 2169 258 52

Prevalence of chlamydia among 9-12th graders in the New Orleans STD Screening Program

Prevalence of gonorrhea among 9-12th graders in the New Orleans STD Screening Program

Treatment and Follow up in School STD Screening Programs Providing treatment and follow up to individuals screened for a health condition is a key component of any screening program. There is no justification for screening if treatment and follow up cannot be provided. Treating students who test positive for CT/GC in school settings is conceivably more efficient because students can be easily located. However, there is no single best approach to locating or notifying infected students of their test results and scheduling treatment in schools. What may work in one school may not work or may not be accepted in another school, even within the same school district. Processes for treatment are often negociated on a school-by-school basis. Flexibility remains the key.

Following Results Notification All programs Offer in-school single dose observed therapy for CT/GC to all students testing positive and who are located in school; Return to each school generally multiple days to locate students needing treatment; Treatment sessions include STD counseling.

In-School Treatment Baltimore -SBHCs Indian Health Service -Nurses Office -IHS Clinic New Orleans -Office in a SBHC New York City -Any other available private space Philadelphia -Counselors Office

Following Results Notification All programs Collaborate with local health services/departments to treat students who are not located in school, those who refuse in-school treatment, or prefer to be treated by their private physician; -Indian Health Service: coordination between tribe, IHS, and the local health department is critical to ensure no one falls through the cracks. -New Orleans: the Medical Director of the STD Clinic is also the Medical Director of the School-Based STD screening program. -New York City, Philadelphia: a policy for expediting HS student treatment is in place in the City STD Clinics. City STD Clinics and DIS are of great assistance to school-based STD screening programs.

Patient Follow Up Students treated in school Baltimore: are instructed to return to the SBHC for retesting after 3 months. New Orleans, New York City: are referred to the STD Clinic to seek additional STD evaluation including HIV testing; NO: are not offered in-school retesting at 3 month but all are encouraged to be tested every year regardless of their previous participation and test results. NYC: are offered retesting 3-4 months after treatment in schools with SBHCs (through the SBHC). Philadelphia: may be offered in-school retesting 3-4 months after treatment when staffing and school schedule permit.

Patient Follow Up Students not located and treated in school Indian Health Service: Coordinates between tribe, IHS, and the local health department to ensure no one falls through the cracks. New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia: are referred to DIS for field follow up.

Partner Notification and Follow Up Students treated in school New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia: are interviewed to elicit partner information. Partners who attend school and located in school are tested for CT/GC (New York City) and offered treatment (New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia); are referred to the city STD Clinic for further STD evaluation including HIV testing (New Orleans, New York City).

Partner Notification and Follow Up Partners not in school and/or not located New York City: are contacted by phone if possible, and if not located by phone, in person visits are made to their school or home. Once located, partners are given information about their exposure to an STD, then given information to go to the Clinic for treatment.

Partner Notification and Follow Up Partners not in school and/or not located New Orleans, Philadelphia: Elicited partner information is given to DIS who initiates notification of exposure and follow up to the city STD clinic. At the STD clinic, partners undergo routine STD evaluation and management (New Orleans) or are seen in an expedited visit (Philadelphia).

Location of treatment for positives detected in the Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program

Time before treatment (days) Time before treatment in the New Orleans High School STD Screening Program School Year Total treated* Time before treatment (days) % treated within 30 days Mean Median 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 Total 137 223 229 222 811 21 25 23 17 22 19 15 86.1% 80.0% 83.4% 95.5% 83.8% *Students with documented date of treatment

Conclusions School-based STD screening programs generally achieve high treatment rates; Treatment usually require strong collaboration with local health services, and tremendous amount of time and personnel; In inner-city schools, treatment is frequently delayed by high absentee and truancy rates; Protocols to ensure high partner notification and treatment have been difficult to develop, which partly contributes to high rates of reinfections among students;1 Collectively, these programs demonstrate that schools provide unique opportunities to control STDs among adolescents. 1Gaydos CA et al., Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:233-237

Acknowledgements Panelists: Special Thanks: Lenore Asbel, MD, Philadelphia, PA Lori de Ravello, Albuquerque, NM Charlotte A. Gaydos, DrPH, Baltimore, MD Meighan Rogers, MPH, New York City, NY Special Thanks: Greta Anschuetz, MPH, Compiled data on location of treatment in the Philadelphia School Screening Program