Chairman, Scientific Programme Committee Congress Conclusions Roger Coates IRPA President Lars Roobol Chairman, Scientific Programme Committee

Why Congress Conclusions? To share the key outcomes with those professionals not able to attend To provide a picture of key issues in the current state of the science and practice of radiation protection as an input to the ongoing development of the system of protection and its implementation

A report of the Congress Conclusions will be compiled and made available through the congress proceedings, and will be published on the IRPA website This presentation addresses selected highlights - with apologies!

System of Protection and Sustainability Ethics (Lochard): 4 core values, 3 procedural values, ‘choosing wisely the best action through practical wisdom’ System challenges (Huyskens): ·        Anxiety for health risks from low dose exposures ·        Confusion about dose quantities & units ·        Anxiety for internal exposure from radioactivity ·        Confusion about dose limit for exposure of public. ·       Can we agree a common approach to ‘banding’ radiation & risk? Alignment with UN sustainability goals (Orrell) – the challenge of waste management timescales

Legislation & Regulation Harmonisation: current focus on implementation of the BSS Review of the very wide EC programme Many, many papers on all aspects of implementation Note the issue of wider harmonisation beyond Europe: eg IAEA BSS Current challenges: Food and water standards Radon NORM Good example of industry self-regulation: NDT Code of Practice in the Netherlands

Medical Very high profile – many papers WHO ‘a public health perspective’ (but of course wider than ‘medical’) Bonn Call for Action Radiation safety culture in healthcare (with IRPA/IOMP/IAEA) Proton therapy is getting ‘bigger’ – lots of optimisation, targeting and development Is the RBE higher than ICRU’s 1.1? Monitoring for health effects in cancer survivors Very very clever CT approaches, and more emphasis on QA

Occupational Challenges continue in implementing eye dose limitations Monitoring is becoming available Ideas for protection increasing But continue to share experiences in this ‘new(ish) challenge Dosimetry generally Intercomparisons: eg of commercial products New approaches: even NaCl salt! Specialist uses: eg wound monitoring

Decommissioning A huge growth area: need more emphasis on sharing experiences, and a series of networks now exist The importance of the ‘end state’: how much activity can reasonably be left in-situ? Development of better measuring techniques – but prior calculation of expected activities can greatly assist The challenge of the ‘new’ clearance levels – the practicalities are very daunting, and the outcome could be very expensive!

Industries involving NORM New ICRP recommendations approaching: flexible approach, importance of aligning with other safety management approaches, with pragmatic consideration of Reference Levels. But is it ‘existing’ or ‘planned’ – potential future discussions with the current regulatory approach A challenge from industry: are we doing too much regulation, are we regulating the right things, and are we getting value for society? Note that European regulations are often used in the wider world Developing and improving the NORM database

Radon All European countries are updating regulations and making radon action plans and/or doing surveys. Many countries need the highest reference level of 300 Bq/m3. Much work is done on building materials and their relation to radon and thoron levels in buildings. In principle, the EU BSS do allow for a large increase in radon/thoron dose in homes, because of the new regulations for building materials. Radon survey approaches Remediation approaches, including ‘dealing’ with the daughters!

Emergency Management Still lots of reflection and learning from Chernobyl and Fukushima Still many gaps and challenges at a European level Decision aiding systems How to optimise protection in emergency and recovery phases – especially noting uncertainties Monitoring strategies – and citizens monitoring Cross- border information and alignment Lessons for communication Iodine remains a key issue: blocking recommendations, monitoring strategies etc The challenges of ‘minor’ events – I131, Ru106 events

Underpinning Science Epidemiology of worker cohorts of Mayak and Sellafield – an important grouping The importance of understanding stem cells

Education and Training Euterp workshop: training the worker, measuring training effectiveness Regulatory requirements in the BSS: re-adjusting national arrangements (especially RPE/RPO) Learning outcomes are now formulated in terms of knowledge, skills, and competences, as demanded by the European Quality Frame. The distinction between RPO's and RPE's is making changes in the education systems in several European member states. Transferability of roles across Europe. Mutual recognition of competence??There is already much overlap in the curriculum of EU member states. Someone moving from one state to another, often only needs to learn the national legislation.

Non Ionising Radiation (Not interesting??) ICNIRP review: guidelines, statements, factsheets But not considering risk management or precaution: taking Values into account is a job for others! ICNIRP (with help from other intl orgs) is developing NIR Protection Principles. There is strong interest in moving towards a common framework/approach for NIR and IR – WATCH THIS SPACE UV risks are highlighted WHO guidance The ‘Sievert Equivalent’: 3.4 mSv/y population average?! Switzerland is at risk!!!

ITS YOUR JOB – you can’t leave it to someone else Communication and Public Understanding A key area, and a key conclusion at every conference So we really must do it – but its not easy! Social science models of risk communication can really help: Reception=> Acceptance=> Behaviour change Importance of the Risk Governance approach – work out how to do things together A key message to all RP professionals: ITS YOUR JOB – you can’t leave it to someone else

Schools programme We know we have to talk to our young people about radiation NVS programme on Wednesday 150 14-15 year old children Mixture of talks and ‘hands on’ demonstrations With some big toys – military monitoring vehicles etc Look at the faces of the children – it tells you how they are feeling about it Look at the faces of the presenters and demonstrators – it tells you how rewarding it is!

Young persons and the Future of our Profession The challenges were reflected in many papers Reviewing skills gaps Recruitment and retention ideas Mentoring programmes Providing clear, interesting and challenging career paths Knowledge Management programmes Links back to ‘getting in early’ at schools, colleges and universities Our young people are best placed to do this Of course it is widespread, across all sectors

Young Scientists and Professionals Prize Competition A standard part of all IRPA’s congresses 11 entries from our RP societies Belgium, Spain, Russia, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Austria, Finland, UK, France, Czech Rep 8 medical sector, one each from radiobiology, NORM monitoring & radon 9 females, 2 males Extremely high standard of both work itself and the presentations We await the winner!

IRPA Young Generation Network Many RP societies now have ‘Young Clubs’ We can now link these together to share experiences and develop their own wider network Open to all YPs – you don’t have to have a ‘Young Club’ to join YGN Mission: To encourage, inspire and develop the next generation Leadership Group now established: Austria, France, UK, Italy, Spain, Netherlands ………… Japan, Korea, Argentina This is our future – either join, or assist!

Personal comment New approach to Refresher Courses has been invigorating: No extra charge Much higher attendance Very substantive presentations – at both ‘basic’ and ‘advanced’ levels Very well appreciated by all! Also – Poster Pitches very well received

Congress Conclusions Its easy – just say it was good!