Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Advertisements

Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
RHIC Accelerator Capability: Present and Future Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Design and Polarization
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Electron Polarization In MEIC
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
Polarized Ion Beams with JLEIC
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
JLEIC Ion and Electron Polarization
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Spin Transparency Study and Test
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Racetrack Booster Option & Initial Spin Tracking Results
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Summary of Working Group 1
Current Status for Ion Polarization Studies
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
M.A. Kondratenko, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
First results of proton spin tracking in a figure-8 ring
G. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, Oct 27, 2015
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Update on the High Energy Booster Design
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Report on Electron Polarization Study
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, April 20, 2017 F. Lin

Electron Polarization Strategies Highly vertically polarized electron beams are injected from CEBAF avoid spin decoherence, simplify spin transport from CEBAF to MEIC, alleviate the detector background Polarization is designed to be vertical in the JLEIC arc to avoid spin diffusion and longitudinal at collision points using spin rotators Universal spin rotator (fixed orbit) rotates the electron polarization from 3 to 12GeV Desired spin flipping is implemented by changing the source polarization Polarization configuration with figure-8 geometry removes electron spin tune energy dependence, significantly suppress the synchrotron sideband resonance Continuous injection of electron bunch trains from the CEBAF is considered to preserve and/or replenish the electron polarization, especially at higher energies Spin matching in some key regions is considered to improve polarization lifetime Compton polarimeter provides non-invasive measurements of the electron polarization IP Spin Rotator Magnetic field Polarization Polarization configuration … Empty buckets 2.1 ns 476 MHz Polarization (Up) Polarization (Down) bunch train & polarization pattern (in arcs)

Spin Tune Scan SLICK/SLICKTRACK and ZGOUBI allow one to have a zero length spin tuning magnet to move the spin tune away from zero. Such magnet in the code only rotates the spin, leaving the orbit intact. Longitudinal field spin tuning solenoid in one straight where the polarization is longitudinal Only moves the spin tune away from zero Does not change the spin direction Breaks the current spin matching condition in the straight IP Spin Rotator e- Magnetic field Polarization Spin tuning solenoid

Spin Tune Scan from SLICK/SLICKTRACK Quadrupole vertical misalignment with a rms value of 0.2mm and dipole role with a rms value of 0.2 mrad. The orbit is corrected with correctors around the ring @ 5 GeV. First order spin resonance occurs when 500 electrons in the Monte-Carlo simulation Optimum Spin Tune 0.0267 Optimum Spin Tune 0.0249 Baseline design optics Optimized baseline design optics Spin-orbit depolarization time extends by a factor of 2.6 in the optimized baseline design

Spin Motions from ZGOUBI Three average spin components of 20 particles vs. time (ms) ~ 7x,y Qualitatively, simulation results in ZGOUBI agree well with that in SLICK/SLCIKTRACK Long depolarization time for s =0.027, short time for s =0.038 Quantitatively, the depolarization time is about 5 times shorter in ZGOUBI than SLCIK/SLICKTRACK, might due to Large closed orbit distortion in ZGOUBI Coupling in solenoids due to the closed orbit distortion

Summary and Future Work Electron polarization design in the JLEIC is completed. Spin tracking simulation with closed orbit distortions using SLICK/SLICKTRACK was performed and showing promising results. Spin tracking simulation with closed orbit distortions was performed in ZGOUBI. Simulation results agree well that in SLICK/SLICKTRACK qualitatively. Future Work Benchmark simulation results from SLICKTRACK and ZGOUBI with the same closed orbit distortions Implement correctors in ZGOUBI using the definition of MULTIPOL print out misalignments of quadrupoles and strengths of correctors from SLICKTRACK, input these information into ZGOUBI Estimate effects of detector solenoid, crab crossing and beam-beam on the polarization lifetime Optimize polarization design by spin matching Perform systematic spin tracking assuming realistic errors and study higher-order spin resonances

Back Up

Close Orbit in SLICK/SLICKTRACK Before orbit correction MAX.ORB.DISTORTN: DXMAX = 13.01533955 MM. DYMAX = 44.66292770 MM. DSMAX = 0.19756703 MM. DEMAX = 0.00201231 MEV. RMS ORB.DISTORTN: DXRMS = 1.96592282 MM. DXVQRMS = 1.96711965 MM. DXVCRMS = 1.93201011 MM. AT QUADS DYRMS = 9.13466663 MM. DYVQRMS = 9.08943471 MM. DYVCRMS = 9.08811068 MM. DSRMS = 0.03628817 MM. DERMS = 0.00200462 MEV. DYPRMS = 1.96765921 MRAD DYABS = 6.16746947 MM. DYBEND = 22121.34052348 MM. After orbit correction MAX.ORB.DISTORTN: DXMAX = 1.70784426 MM. DYMAX = 0.37412418 MM. DSMAX = 0.02578462 MM. DEMAX = 0.00024464 MEV. RMS ORB.DISTORTN: DXRMS = 0.23823080 MM. DXVQRMS = 0.23807316 MM. DXVCRMS = 0.23333431 MM. AT QUADS DYRMS = 0.05731394 MM. DYVQRMS = 0.06759153 MM. DYVCRMS = 0.03287557 MM. DSRMS = 0.00419851 MM. DERMS = 0.00024370 MEV. DYPRMS = 0.07774984 MRAD DYABS = 0.03486573 MM. DYBEND = 0.29488997 MM.

Closed Orbit Distortion in ZGOUBI Closed orbit distortion due to random quadrupole misalignments FFQs’ misalignments are included. FFQs’ misalignments are not included. This scenario is used for the spin tracking in ZGOUBI using 20 particles.

Emittances Spin tune at 0.027 Spin tune at 0.038 20 particles were used for tracking, ~ 2 days for 7 damping time of ~ 600 ms (80000 turns) After 7 damping time, the horizontal emittance is close to the analytical value of 9 nm-rad. The non-zero vertical emittance is caused by the coupling of particle motions in the solenoids in the spin rotators, due to the closed orbit distortion. The emittances in two cases do not change because only spin precession is adjusted by the spin tuning solenoid.

Spin Tune Scan @ 5 GeV Quadrupole vertical misalignment with a rms value of 0.2mm and dipole role with a rms value of 0.2 mrad. The orbit is corrected with correctors around the ring. First order spin resonance occurs when 500 electrons in the Monte-Carlo simulation Optimum Spin Tune 0.0267 Nasty, nasty sidebands ! Figure-8 MEIC collider ring has no synchrotron sideband resonances !