AP 4: ECHA - preparation of work under recast POPs Regulation AP 5: ECHA – Monitoring and reporting under recast POPs Regulation 20th Meeting of the Competent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Article 45 (5) of the CLP Regulation
Advertisements

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
Léa RIFFAUT ANSES PPP Coordination Unit
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
PROJECT BACKGROUND & PROGRESS NIGERIA POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB S ) MANAGEMENT PROJECT (P )
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Stage 3 Review: TFEIP/ETC-ACC Karin Kindbom, Martin Adams & Justin Goodwin.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
E-PRTR dataflow management Introduction and informal review process Eva Goossens Head of Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme.
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM CONVENTIONS Barbados, March 2009.
National workshop Pilot testing of Guidelines for updating of national implementation plans to address the new persistent organic pollutants in Abuja,
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
F-Gases.
REACH 2018 Find your co-registrants and prepare to register jointly.
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Chemical substances self – classification issues Lithuanian approach
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
CCMI 9 September 2015 Public Hearing: Nanotechnology for a competitive chemical industry Social aspects: education, health and safety.
Case Study: Water Based PU
Ulrike Döring (German Environment Agency, Dep. Emission situation)
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
Hazardous substances on the EU market
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Electronic Reporting Systems
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
The Commission Communication on implementation (COM (2012) 95) in relation to Water Industry Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Drinking Water,
Proposed EQS Directive
European Commission DG Environment
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
Report on the application of the POP Regulation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Group III Ways to Establish Good Communication in the Chain „Manufacturer, importer, Downstream User – Competent Authority“ Seminar on Chemical Substance.
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Quality reporting under Regulation (EC) No 1165/2008
EU Water Framework Directive
Noor Vergeer, Wojtek Kalocinski Border management and Schengen
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
AP 4: ECHA - preparation of work under recast POPs Regulation AP 5: ECHA – Monitoring and reporting under recast POPs Regulation 19th Meeting of the Competent.
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Action Plan following the Active substance workshop
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
Presentation transcript:

AP 4: ECHA - preparation of work under recast POPs Regulation AP 5: ECHA – Monitoring and reporting under recast POPs Regulation 20th Meeting of the Competent Authorities for Regulation (EC) N° 850/2004 on Persistent Organic Pollutants Johanna Peltola-Thies Ignacio González Rodríguez 13 June 2019

AP 4: ECHA - preparation of work under recast POPs Regulation

Outline General New POPs identification Questions

Overall status Expected entry into force: July 2019 We are in schedule Generic ECHA-website on POPs to go live very soon after entry into force Limited resources and uncertainty on the operational budget for this year

Overall timeline –adjusted to the new estimate for entry into force

Outline General New POPs identification Questions

New substance identification from the recast perspective – separate PCs in the EU in parallel to POPRC –work useful?

Several issues to clarify and agree this year, e.g.,: EU public consultation on the proposal (Article 8(1)(b)) and risk profile and risk management steps (Article 8(1)(c) & (d)) Several issues to clarify and agree this year, e.g.,: What is the added value of separate EU public consultations on risk profile and risk management evaluation during the work of the POPRC? International calls for comments launched by the SC secretariat – should ECHA merely magnify these? Added value of an EU public consultation reached already during the public consultation stage when preparing the EU proposal (Annex D -report)

Alignment of the work on new POPs and EU risk management processes The initial aim of the Commission is to align the preparation of POPs EU proposals with REACH risk management processes Need to further develop the approach to reflect the final recast Article 8(1) with regard to REACH risk management processes Need to also consider: - alignment with biocides and pesticides –processes - how to work on the substances not in use in the EU and the priority Proposal to be developed by ECHA in the autumn - for discussion and agreement to the next POP CA meeting

tbd: depending on the level of ambition and available resources Identification of new POPs (WP1) - adjusted Deliverables Timeline Agreement on the principles of work steps for new substances and their relation to REACH restriction process among MSCAs, COM and ECHA (and work under other relevant processes, e.g., PPP and biocides) By the end of 2019 Process descriptions and work instructions for drafting (1) a proposal for identification of a new substance according to Annex D of Stockholm Convention, (2) annex E risk profile and (3) annex F risk management evaluation (mainly ECHA internal) Case management development (ECHA internal step) 2019 Agreement on the level of informing the public on on-going work with the Commission and the MSCAs at the end of the year. Adaptation of the related IT tools (ACT, PACT), if needed. By the end of the 2019 Development of the public consultation procedure for POPs-related processes (ECHA internal step) (Mass screening/search pilot and work instruction for regular mass screenings) tbd: depending on the level of ambition and available resources

Outline General New POPs identification Questions

Questions for discussion ??

AP 5: ECHA – Monitoring and reporting under recast POPs Regulation Documents POP-CA_06-19_05-ECHA- Reporting- Reporting on implementation under the POPs Regulation –initial analysis, proposals and questions – working document POP-CA_06-19_04-ECHA- Preparation-Template and questions for written consultation related to the set up of ECHA’s tasks on reporting and implementation under the recast POPs Regulation Background documents: POP-CA_11-18_04-ECHA_doc 1 – Preparation of work under recast POPs Regulation POP-CA_11-18_04-ECHA_doc 2 - Annex - Project Initiation document for MSCAs POP-CA_11-18_04-ECHA_doc 4 – Annex - Supplementary information to PID POP-CA_11-18_05-ECHA_doc 5 - Monitoring and reporting under recast POPs Regulation POP-CA_11-18_05-ECHA_doc 6 - Annex Synthesis Reports Recommendations

Outline Drivers for change Working document - Reporting on implementation initial analysis, proposals and questions – a non-exhaustive overview of issues Deliverables and timelines

Towards a structured (IT-based) reporting system Drivers for change: Improve the comparability of the data across MS by ensuring an standardised way of reporting the data (e.g. production and placing on the market, stockpiles, release inventories) the quality, relevance of the data the frequency of update (where relevant) Reduce the reporting burden by (re)using data that is already available (to the extent that is possible) simplifying and automatizing the reporting process Support the reporting obligations of ECHA (Union Overview) and the Commission Promote the active public dissemination of the data COM(2017) 312 final- Actions to Streamline Environmental Reporting: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/reporting/pdf/action_plan_env_issues.pdf

Outline Drivers for change Working document - Reporting on implementation initial analysis, proposals and questions – a non-exhaustive overview of issues Deliverables and timelines

POP-CA_05-19_05-ECHA- Reporting Reporting on implementation under the POPs Regulation –initial analysis, proposals and questions – working document Content: Analysis of the reporting/data submission obligations under the Recast Interlinks with reporting obligations under other legislative frameworks (e.g. REACH, PIC) Review of the current reporting format, reports and practices Proposals and questions regarding: The update of the reporting format and Confidentiality of the information - Areas where ECHA’s support could be explored (depending on the resources) Reporting elements 1. Production and placing on the market 2. Exports 3. Stockpiles 4. Inventories on intentional releases 5. Provision of financial/ technical assistance 6. National Implementation plans 7. Public awareness and information exchange 8. Enforcement

Annual production and placing on the market Data currently requested https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007D0639 Reporting sections Information being requested Annual production and placing on the market - Name of the substance - Volume (produced, placed on the market, imported, and exported) - Importing/ exporting country (for imported and exported volumes) Challenges There is no reporting obligation for industry under the POPs Regulation (in addition to art. 4(3) notifications). This means that MSCAs need to check the registrations under REACH and CLP notifications under CLH regulation and then address companies that have registered/notified POPs Confidentiality issues when publishing data on ECHA’s website (few companies manufacturing these substances) Interlinks REACH registration data and PIC data could be directly extracted from ECHA’s databases

Stockpiles Challenges Interlinks Data currently requested https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007D0639 Reporting sections Information being requested Stockpiles a) Stockpiles of substances the use of which is not permitted - Name of the substance - Notification year - Characterisation of the stockpile, concentration of the substance (mg/kg), volume (kg), location - Measures in place to manage the stockpile b) Stockpiles of substances the use of which is permitted Challenges - ECHA will not receive data directly from Industry, but through MSCAs. There is a reporting obligation for industry under the POPs Regulation to notify the MSCA of stockpiles >50 kg of substances, the use of which is still permitted but there is no reporting obligation for stockpiles of substances, the use of which is not permitted (to be dealt as waste) Interlinks - Inventories of equipment containing PCBs in volumes above 5dm3 have been collected and should be regularly updated by MSCA as part of the implementation of the PCB directive – no need for reporting under POPs regulation?

Release reduction, minimisation and elimination Data currently requested https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007D0639 Reporting sections Information being requested Release reduction, minimisation and elimination Data on estimated releases for Annex III substances per compartment (air, water, land) Description on the measures place for identification, characterisation and minimisation of the sources and releases. Challenges The quantification of the emissions is estimated based on emission factors and activity rates -> Review of data submitted is needed in order to get meaningful trends on emissions Different methodologies/guidelines available (EMEP/EEA, UNEP-POPs toolkit) Interlinks Emissions to air already reported under Convention on Long Range Transport Pollution (CLRTP) to the Centre on Emissions and Projections (CEIP) of European Monitoring and Evaluation Program (EMEP) and the European Environmental agency Emissions submitted by industry under the E-PRTR regulation (apply only to certain economic activities and facilities above capacity and emissions thresholds) Inventory of emissions, discharges and losses of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive (submitted to the EEA and available in EIONET under WISE SoE or WFD reporting obligations).

Other notifications to be received from MSCAs: Derogations of waste management [article 7(4)(b)(iii)] -> MS allows a waste operator to deal with POP waste following a method listed in part 2 of annex V Only 4 notifications received until now (DE(2), FI, FR). Question -> need to support COM updating the current format? Notification of articles containing POPs which are produced or are already in use before the regulation becomes applicable to the substance [article 4(2)] Challenge -> no obligation from industry to notify under the POPs regulation No data has been submitted so far from MSCAs Potential link with Waste Framework Directive database for POPs in Candidate List? Notifications of substances produced and used as a closed-system site-limited intermediate [article 4(3)] Question -> need to support COM on developing templates/standard formats to support such reporting by industry?

Outline Drivers for change Working document - Reporting on implementation initial analysis, proposals and questions – a non-exhaustive overview of issues Deliverables and timelines

Deliverables/milestones related to reporting (WP2/WP4) Timeline Initial analysis, questions and proposals of ECHA to the POP CAs on various aspects of the reporting – for discussion in the meeting June 13 and for written comments by end of June 2019 2018 – T1\2019 Adoption of the Recast Entry into force of the Recast June 2019 July 2019 Proposal of the reporting formats and instructions. To be shared with MSCAs for feedback.   Proposal of an interim submission system for the reports if considered necessary (e.g. CIRCABC). T2/2019 POPs reporting system vision and analysis of the IT solution T2-T3/2019 Proposal prepared to establish an implementing act (Commission in consultation of POP CAs and ECHA) T3/2019 Finalisation of the reporting format The precise reporting formats need to be defined before the start of the reporting period 2020. Otherwise it cannot be ensured that the CAs would be able to collect the relevant information. T3/2019-T1/2020 Review of the possibility to develop an IT-solution for the reporting formats to enhance the level of automation in processing the submitted information If such development is considered feasible, following deliverables would be expected: End of 2019-2020 Mock-up of the IT system for reporting to be shared with MSCA and Forum for feedback Reporting system delivered for testing. Necessary changes after testing. Reporting system available to MSCA in ECHA’s website. Relevant work procedures in place. Carry out training internally and externally. to be defined

Ambition level for reporting on the monitoring of the implementation ECHA as a the interface for reporting duties Receive, aggregate and disseminate information submitted by the POP-CAs following an agreed reporting format Similar type of reporting as done by the POP-CAs towards the SC secretariat using the electronic reporting system ECHA as “service provider” for the reporting duties Reuse of available information submitted under REACH, CLP and PIC Regulations to support the reporting obligations under POPs Provide a central platform for submission of notifications by industry towards the POP-CAs stockpiles Art 4.(3)(d) notifications Need to balance the ambition level and the foreseen added value with the available resources

Questions to trigger discussion and to focus the further work of the new reporting format Please, see document: POP-CA_06-19_04-ECHA- preparation- Reporting on implementation under the POPs Regulation –initial analysis, proposals and questions – working document and template for comments ( please provide comments by the end of June): POP-CA_06-19_05-ECHA- reporting- Template and questions for written consultation related to the set up of ECHA’s tasks on reporting and implementation under the recast POPs Regulation

Thank you! ECHA_POP@echa.europa.eu Subscribe to our news at echa.europa.eu/subscribe Follow us on Twitter @EU_ECHA Follow us on Facebook Facebook.com/EUECHA