Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD including data source, data processing and features. Transcriptomes from TSA, genomes ... Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Table 1 Patient characteristics of attendees of the influenza vaccination, irrespective of AF status From: Yield of screening for atrial fibrillation in.
Advertisements

Figure 1. Unified models predicting gene regulation based on landscapes of gene-regulating factors. For each gene, position specific combinatorial patterns.
Figure 1. The scheme of RCAS
Figure 2. The graphic integration of CNAs with altered expression genes in lung AD and SCC. The red lines represent the amplification regions for CNA and.
From: Learning by Working in Big Cities
Fig. 1 Nodes in a conceptual knowledge graph
From: Introducing the PRIDE Archive RESTful web services
Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:
Figure 2. Workflow of MethMotif Batch Query
From: Dynamic protein–RNA interactions in mediating splicing catalysis
Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown skin lesions with indurated borders located on both lower legs. Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown.
Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter PQS and scheme of G oxidation to OG, as well as (B) the proposed APE1-dependent pathway ... Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter.
Figure 1. Circular taxonomy tree based on the species that were sequenced in our study. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
ADAb: anti-drug antibody.
Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.
FIGURE 1 Kidney biopsies of Patients 1 and 2
Figure 1: Axial T2 W images of penis showed a well-defined septated area of 2 cm in the posterior aspect of ... Figure 1: Axial T2 W images.
FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels
FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:
FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.
FIGURE 1 Flow chart of patient enrollment and exclusion
Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.
Figure 1. autoMLST workflow depicting placement and de novo mode
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of DNA and tc-DNA
Fig. 1 Mean change from baseline in ANC ± s. e
Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).
Graph 1. The number of homicide cases per year discussing neuro-evidence. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of hNTHL1 contributes to the processing of lesions in nucleosomes, even in the ... Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of.
Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.
Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia transmission, with arrows showing the transitions between health states. Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia.
Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.
Figure 1. A, Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals for each solid organ ... Figure 1. A, Crude incidence.
FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram
Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum creatinine and anti-GBM antibodies before and during treatment with cyclophosphamide, ... Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum.
Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR
Figure 1. The pipeline of Aggrescan3D 2.0 server.
FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean, g/d) among US infants and young children by age group and tertile of mean ... FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean,
Figure 1 Study flowchart and patient flow
Figure 1. Prediction result for birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (PDB: 1bv1), as obtained by comparison to the cherry ... Figure 1. Prediction result for.
Figure 1. Using Voronoi tessellation to define contacts
Figure 4. Levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immune and inflammatory markers in participants grouped by CSF human ... Figure 4. Levels of cerebrospinal.
Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A) TMPipEOPP and (B) OMHEPzEOPP in the presence of different concentrations of KRAS. The RLS ... Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A)
Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of solar energy and coal-fired power generation system. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean concentration of hsTnT (A) and sST2 (B) at baseline (BL) and each subsequent ... Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean.
Figure 1. Time to clinical stability (a) and time to defervescence (b) in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. ... Figure 1. Time to clinical stability.
Figure 1. (A) Architecture of Doc2Hpo. (B) Interactive user interface
Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface (Start page, Parameter page): MERMAID provides two ways to submit a protein ... Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface.
Figure 1. Yvis platform overview
Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps
Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock server that is divided into three major steps: (i) input of unbound or bound protein ... Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock.
Figure 1. Overview of features that can be assessed in a single RegulationSpotter VCF analysis run. Depending upon a ... Figure 1. Overview of features.
Figure 1 Patient disposition
Figure 1. Trial profile. (A) Part A and (B) part B
Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP) for selection ... Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal.
Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM responders over the 2-week treatment period (A), the proportion of SBM responders by ... Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM.
Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result
Figure 1. CSB does not affect the recruitment of OGG1 to oxidative DNA damage. (A) Representative stills of time-lapse ... Figure 1. CSB does not affect.
Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced CT scan of melanoma patient presenting with metastases in the liver and lymph ... Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced.
Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1. Optimization of the variant calling algorithm, ADIScan1, by tangential conversion of read depth ratios ... Figure 1. Optimization of the variant.
Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.
Source:Zimnisky (2014). Source:Zimnisky (2014).
Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.
Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched in gene families showing high or low omega (dN/dS) values for Pneumocystis jirovecii. ... Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched.
Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening and diagnostic algorithm at the MSF clinic, Karachi, Pakistan, March 2016–September ... Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD including data source, data processing and features. Transcriptomes from TSA, genomes ... Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD including data source, data processing and features. Transcriptomes from TSA, genomes from NCBI and primary literature were used as data sources for the construction of eukaryotic nucleic acid binding protein database (ENPD). Recording the 3 types of NBPs in eukaryotes: DBPs, RBPs and DRBPs. The basic information of NBPs as well as their functional and regulatory information are also curated by both prediction and manual. See text for details. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 47, Issue D1, 24 November 2018, Pages D322–D329, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1112 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. Functions of TFs, RBPs and DRBPs in ENPD Figure 2. Functions of TFs, RBPs and DRBPs in ENPD. NBPs are involved in every stage of gene regulation and are ... Figure 2. Functions of TFs, RBPs and DRBPs in ENPD. NBPs are involved in every stage of gene regulation and are important in most if not all biological processes through interactions with DNAs and RNAs, controlling cell identity and pathological status. (A) TFs usually bind to DNA regulatory elements of a gene and regulate its transcription activity, while (B) RBPs have diverse functions related to mRNA regulation, including alternative splicing, mRNA stability control, and degradation. (C) The two types of proteins can cooperate to recruit ncRNA for subsequent transcriptional activator recruitment. DRBPs have a wide range of distinct functions: (D) functioning as a typical TF with add-on abilities such as interacting with ncRNA decoys; (E) recruiting ncRNA with co-activator function; (F) regulating mRNAs and DNA regulatory elements just as typical RBPs and TFs, with the two functions competing for the same protein; (G) interacting with lncRNA for stability enhancement, thus increasing DRBP abundance and further activating downstream gene transcriptions and (H) altering the phosphorylation status by the mediation of lncRNA, enhancing the gene activating activity. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 47, Issue D1, 24 November 2018, Pages D322–D329, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1112 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.