Agenda –March 8, 2018 EOD Process Change - Jennifer Modestou

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

BY: HUMAN RESOURCES POSITION MANAGMENT & EMPLOYMENT TEAM HIRING PROCESS.
Success Factors Recruitment Management
HR SERVICE REQUEST SYSTEM Department Demonstrations February 2012.
Departmental Research Administrators Workgroup (DRAW) November 30, 2011 deMarneffe 132.
PEOPLE FIRST Department of Management Services State of Florida Orientation Session & Briefing October 7, 2002.
UCPath Center Job Opportunities. 2 UCPath is a core part of the University's strategy to maintain its academic excellence while improving services for.
Chapter 8 Sport Management
Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014 East Region Community Meeting April.
Southern Connecticut State University ANNUAL FACULTY RECRUITMENT WORKSHOP Fall 2014.
Business Operations Meeting HR Update Human Resources June 16, 2009.
Informational Sessions for Department Administrative Staff Kansas State University Revised February 2012.
Administrative Services Workshop May 8, 2008 Overview Classified Hiring ProcessClassified Hiring Process Processing Classified IntentsProcessing Classified.
Search and Selection / Recruiting. AGENDA Overview ◦ Ground Rules ◦ Discuss Key Concepts Questions to Answer ◦ Process Improvement (?) ◦ Automated Process.
Ms. Ann Sherman, Director of Human Resources. Ann Sherman Director of Human Resources Phyllis Hurley Assistant Director Payroll and IS June Nelson Payroll.
What is EPA RecruitmentWeb? A web based recruitment and applicant tracking system designed to streamline the recruitment and hiring process for EPA Faculty.
Strategy Implementation Workforce Utilization & Employment Practices
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Recruitment & UO Process Preview for HR Partners Talent Acquisition & Development, Human Resources February 12, 2016.
New HR service Launch date - 23 April Agenda Reasons for change New HR services Responding to customer requirements Implementation 2.
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 8 Preparing for Appointment Process.
High Potential Leader Program Brevard Public School District Nancy Rehbine Zentis, Ph.D.
SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.
SuccessFactors Recruiting.
Welcome To University Shared Services
Leadership Development at Bruce Power
QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY RECRUITMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Transformational Human Resources Changing Today for a Better Tomorrow
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Training for Faculty Search Committees
Human Aspects of Organizing Reading: pp. 173 – 183.
Job Rotation March 2016.
Well Trained International
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
Recruitment Process The new centralized recruitment process
We Value Diversity It is important to London Drugs that our workforce, vendor, and customer base reflects the diversity of our communities We recognize.
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
UW SYSTEM AND INSTITUTION LEADERSHIP Administrative Hiring Practices Presented by Shenita Brokenburr, Ph.D. UW System Human Resources August 30, 2017.
Review of Process Human Resources Projects
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
Academic Search Process
Academic Professional Promotion Implementation Team
Performance Management Workday Module
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
OneUSG Connect – Careers
The Key to Hiring Excellence “The act of working together to achieve a common purpose.” —Oxford Dictionary.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Auburn University Project TigerTalent Status March 1, 2018.
Recruitment Process Update - CoSE
Search and Screening Guidelines Faculty UCF Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action EO/AA Search and Screening Guidelines 9_14 Prepared by Suzanne Lin.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process
Business Partner Meetings March 2015
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
New Way of Recruiting and Onboarding
Introduction to HRM What is it….?.
University of Massachusetts Amherst Faculty Search Activities Guide
Workforce Development Goal
Streamline, Simplify, Organize, Automate
RECRUITING Staff and Student
22 FEBRUARY 2013 PRESENTATION OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL of SOUTH AFRICA
The University Career Architecture Project (UCAP) is designed to better define jobs, support career progression, and align compensation practices with.
HR Governance Council Meeting
Governance Council Agenda for 8/9/2018
Agenda –April 12, 2018 • updates – Keith and Angie
Agenda –May 10, 2018 • UI Employer Brand updates – Ben
Agenda –January 11, 2018 Status Update on Initiatives/Baker Tilly on WebEx Succession Planning (Keith/Dee) Talent Acquisition Governance (Cheryl)
Agenda Welcome: Cheryl Reardon
Survey Results from 12 Committees
UCR MEI Class: Cultivating a Community of Respect Hiring Manager’s Guidelines on Recruiting Tanya Adams, Loren Bacallo, Anna Finn, Carie Wilkens-Smith.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda –March 8, 2018 EOD Process Change - Jennifer Modestou Talent Acquisition Update - Overview of project to date/decisions made- Angie Bell - Communication Plan- Lin Larson - Change Management milestones – Angie Bell - Pre-Planning Demonstration (Feb 21 & Feb 22) – Reactions/Feedback- Angie Bell Proposed changes to furlough process - Kevin Ward Talent@Iowa Committee Survey Results - Neda Barrett

Change Management Milestones/Key Deliverables Change Readiness/Recruiter Assessment Final Assessment Due 3/16 (Blair & Teresa) Job Impact Assessment/Recruiter ID Final Recruiter Identification Due 3/26 (Angie & Keith) Issue resolution plan Due 4/6 (Angie & Keith; Steering Committee) Specific Org Workforce Planning/Coaching assistance for Senior Starts 4/30 (Blair & Teresa) Job change implementation Recruiter/Non-Recruiter Impacts Identified Due 4/30 (Keith & Blair) Coaching/Issue resolution Completed by 6/18 (Blair & Teresa) Training Prep begins Due 6/18 (TA Team; Keith) Training Sessions held (July through Sept.)

Upcoming change in administration of P&S Furlough Program •Benefit of career status include notice and priority consideration for finding another University position •Current process is not compatible with process in the new Talent Acquisition system •Therefore, need to modify the way priority consideration of furlough employees is part of the search process What will be the same? •Furlough candidates will self identify to exercise priority as part of the application process •Furlough candidates that meet the qualifications of the position will be guaranteed an interview, working directly with the local recruiter •Furlough candidates continue to have ability to use resume data base, furlough networking and support from Comp/Class •Maintains university commitment to furlough staff

Changes and advantages •Hiring process will not be stopped to interview a candidate with furlough priority •Comp class will work with local recruiters to audit the process •Reduces negative reactions to stopping the search due to application of furlough candidate •Becomes part of a larger focus on internal talent pipelines, of which furlough candidates are one part Next Steps •Complete configuration of Taleo system •Intensive training of local recruiters on their role in the Taleo system •Continue consultation with campus leadership •Prepare changes in the Operations Manual policy to reflect modified process

Proposed Change in EOD’s Monitoring and Review of P&S CONFIDENTIAL Mar. 1, 2018 Proposed Change in EOD’s Monitoring and Review of P&S Search and Selection Summary Forms (Prior to Implementation of the Taleo System) Proposal: Prior to implementation of the Taleo system, EOD proposes to cease conducting the post-org review of Search & Selection Summary (S&SS) forms for P&S searches. This change would likely occur in early to mid-April 2018. REQ: No change proposed for review of Requisitions Responsibility for the review and approval of P&S Reqs transferred to HR- Comp & Class in January 2016 and to HR-Employment Services in October 2017. EOD provided training to HR staff prior to these changes, continues to have review access to Reqs in Workflow, and provides feedback as needed to HR staff if concerns are noted. PIR: No change proposed for review of Pre-Interview Reports (PIR) EOD reviews and approves PIRs, provides feedback to search chair/admin, HR Unit Rep, and/or Sr. HR leader as needed. PIR step enables EOD to provide timely feedback, before a hiring manager/search chair becomes fully committed to selecting a particular candidate. The majority of EOD staff time is spent on resolving issues at the PIR stage, not the S&SS stage. S&SS: Proposed change for review of Search & Selection Summary (S&SS) forms Within the next 4-6 weeks, and prior to implementation of the Taleo system, EOD proposes to cease conducting the post-org review of S&SS forms for P&S searches. The review of Faculty S&SS forms by EOD will continue unchanged. In addition to its online P&S/Faculty Recruitment Manual, EOD will provide a one-page reference guide to explain EOD’s review criteria for S&SS forms for search chairs/admins, HR Unit reps, and Sr. HR leaders prior to making changes to the post-org review process. EOD will also offer training on EOD’s review function as a refresher for HR representatives & Sr. HR leaders. EOD will continue to have view access to P&S S&SS forms in Workflow in order to perform an audit of these forms. EOD will provide feedback to search chairs/admins, HR Unit Reps, and/or Sr. HR leaders on particular forms as needed but will not be required to review and approve every P&S S&SS form. APPT: No change proposed for review of appointment forms (APPT)

Possible Advantages/Reasons to Proceed with Proposed Change: Rationale for Interim Change: EOD to begin transitioning from a reviewer function to an auditor function. This change will function as a preliminary step to help hiring managers and HR reps/Sr. HR leaders transition to the new talent acquisition model, for which EOD will not have a post-org reviewer role for transactions in the workflow path. Greater value added for EOD staff review at the PIR stage rather than the S&SS stage EOD staff time spend the majority of their time on the PIR review, not on the S&SS form review. Gradually shifting more of the responsibility for careful review of search documents to the departments/orgs is consistent with the new talent acquisition model that is proposed by Baker Tilley and the UI Taleo design team. Upcoming staffing change in EOD Due to upcoming changes in the staffing level in the EEO compliance functional area of EOD, we believes there’s a need to reduce the volume of search forms that receive a high level of scrutiny by EOD. Reducing the volume of search forms that EOD must review and approve will make our temporary plan more feasible to have a staff member from HR- Employment Services assist EOD on a part-time basis with the review of search forms. Possible Advantages/Reasons to Proceed with Proposed Change: Reduced time to fill P&S vacancies by eliminating a step in the review process Colleges and organizational units take on greater responsibility/ownership for their hiring decisions and the associated documentation Planning for new Taleo system is well underway with a high degree of confidence in the process to ensure timely review by the compliance team for design decisions No OFCCP audits underway at UI at this time Possible Concerns: Reduced ability to correct errors before S&SS forms are approved Lesser qualified candidates are selected and offered a position without sufficient justification by the hiring manager/search chair Biased or other problematic language included in the official justification Documentation of reasons for non-selection of interviewed and/or veterans’ preference candidates not sufficiently documented Salaries are offered that exceed the salary range as advertised in the REQ or the pay level maximum Offers extended without obtaining two different people (one each at the departmental and org level) authorizing the offer Increased legal risk in the event of a complaint (internal and external), lawsuit, and/or OFCCP audit

Talent@IOWA Survey Results

Survey Results from 13 T@Iowa Committees Phase I: Immigration FMLA IT Transition HR as Independent Org Payroll Phase II: Data Driven Decisions Benchmarking Talent Acquisition Phase III: Policy Benchmarking Compensation & Classification Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Training and Onboarding

Survey Questions The committee’s charge assisted in focusing the work of the committee. I was able to obtain adequate information to contribute to discussions and make recommendations. The committee provided an open environment in which I was able to share my views. UHR’s leadership support advanced the work of the committee. Time spent on the committee involvement was a good use of my time. 57 responses out of 121 members (47%)

"It strengthened the decentralized model with centralized oversight." Survey Comments "It strengthened the decentralized model with centralized oversight." "Feeling like I could make a positive impact." "Focus on the charge. Be thoughtful but move swiftly." "Working with a diverse group; brainstorming ideas." "Collaborating on a cross-campus team.” "Being able to participate in the initiative was beneficial to understanding what is changing and why.”