Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,

Advertisements

OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF

ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF

1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF

3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.

Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF

1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)

Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.

5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.

CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.

ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF

Finding the LCM Test #4 Question 1 Find the LCM of 3 and 5.

1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.

1 Survey on the transition time from ACSF to Manual Driving Toyota Motor Corporation Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the expert of Japan.

Hand-off Warning Time of LKA

Regulatory strategy when voluntary systems become mandated

Discussion paper – Major Issues

7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016

Presentation of ACSF C tests

Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles

Informal Working Group on ACSF

Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25

Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12

Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system

Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07

Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Report Task Force UNR46 5th Meeting OICA Paris, 26-27th September 2016

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy

on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system

ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris

Least Common Multiples

Submitted by the Expert of Sweden

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

L.C.M. Practice © T Madas.

Signalling of information and warnings

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

مهندسي و مديريت زنجيره‌هاي تامين

Data Filtering Method Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute

ACSF B1+C functional description

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin

Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems

Informal Document: ACSF-10-08

Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/19e

Submitted by the Secretary

Maximum allowable Override Force

ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances

ACSF B1+C functional description

Emergency Steering Function

Interpretation of CSF warnings #2

ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3

Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction

ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI

Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases

Automated Lane Keeping Systems

Presentation transcript:

Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre Submitted by the experts of OICA Informal Document: ACSF-14-10 Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

LCM does not start Is it prohibited to start LCM or not? If, after a period of no longer than [3s] the driver is not holding the steering control, the system shall detect hands-off Hand-off Detection by system 2.5s LCP LCM According to CP proposal: « the system has not detected that the driver is holding the steering control at the start of the LCM » Is it prohibited to start LCM or not?

LCM does not start Is it prohibited to start LCM or not? If, after a period of no longer than [3s] the driver is not holding the steering control, the system shall detect hands-off Hand-off Detection by system 2.5s LCP LCM According to CP proposal: « the system has not detected that the driver is holding the steering control at the start of the LCM » Is it prohibited to start LCM or not?

LCM starts Is it prohibited to start LCM or not? If, after a period of no longer than [3s] the driver is not holding the steering control, the system shall detect hands-off Hand-off Detection by system 2.5s LCP LCM According to CP proposal: « the system has not detected that the driver is holding the steering control at the start of the LCM » Is it prohibited to start LCM or not?