Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Advertisements

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.
Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
Comparing previous simulation work with current study.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
TPAD training protocol.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.
Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.
A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Kinematic pattern analyses.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Experimental results for healthy participants.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
Fig. 2 CFD results. CFD results. Results of CFD simulations in horizontal (left column) and vertical (right column) cross-sections. All models oriented.
Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Experimental results for tremor reduction.
Translation of a spherical object.
Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Fig. 2 Meta-analysis: Country-specific effects on vote choice.
Brain-computer interfaces.
Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.
Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.
Fig. 4 Resynthesized complex boronic acid derivatives based on different scaffolds on a millimole scale and corresponding yields. Resynthesized complex.
Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.
Fig. 1 Product lifetime distributions for the eight industrial use sectors plotted as log-normal probability distribution functions (PDF). Product lifetime.
Exp. 3A real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations peeling and reapplying electrodes during stimulation. Exp. 3A.
Characteristics of the topology-optimized actuator and long-term tests
The two modalities for the multitask condition.
Probability distribution of the communication outages as a function of distance. Probability distribution of the communication outages as a function of.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Quadcopter equipped with dual-stiffness origami arms.
Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.
Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.
Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.
Fig. 3 Load dependence of friction force and corresponding COF.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Fig. 3 Production of protein and Fe(II) at the end of growth correlated with increasing concentrations of ferrihydrite in the media that contained 0.2.
Fig. 2 Folding motions of the TCO with strain-softening behavior.
Fig. 4 Reactive MD simulation showing the origins of chemical and physical effects on friction. Reactive MD simulation showing the origins of chemical.
Fig. 1 Location of the Jirzankal Cemetery.
Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.
Characterization and optimization of the device.
The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.
Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.
Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.
Fig. 4 Behavior of resistance peak near density nm = 5.
Comparison of STM data on point impurities with DFT calculations
Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.
Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.
Presentation transcript:

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness sections. (B) Actual structure, (C) FEA simulated model with strain, and (D) computer-reconstructed cylinder shown during compression. (E) Average displacement error in millimeters between calculated and measured versus normalized displacement for each stiffness section with 1 SD above and below over nine single-axis compression tests. Patricia A. Xu et al. Sci. Robotics 2019;4:eaaw6304 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works