Oakland Raiders: Salary Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Factor Markets Unit IV.
Advertisements

Profit 1. Profit defined A typical assumption in all of economics is that firms are profit maximizing entities. This essentially means that if a firm.
The Underpayment of Restricted Players in North American Sports Leagues DANIEL CIANCIOSO ARTICLE WRITTEN BY: ANTHONY KRAUTMANN, PETER VON ALLMEN AND DAVID.
Oligopoly The challenge of analyzing interdependent strategic decisions.
1 Monopsony Monopsony is a situation where there is one buyer – you have seen Monopoly, a case of one seller. Here we want to explore the impact on the.
Monopsony Monopsony is a situation where there is one buyer – you have seen Monopoly, a case of one seller. Here we want to explore the impact on the.
Labor Union Ideas 1. Intro You and I have seen that firms that want to hire labor take a good look at the marginal revenue product of labor and consider.
Reasons behind the Lockout deal. Owners Want a 18 Game Regular Season Owners Want More Overall Money The Amount of Upgrades the Facilities Cost Rookie.
Chapter 37 If We Build It,Will They Come? And Other Sports Questions Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 8: Economics of Professional Sports. Time Honored Myths Team owners are losing money. They stay in the game for the fun if it! The ball park is.
Team Cost, Profit and Winning Here we start with definitions and then look at idea of how a sports owner might run the team. 1.
1 Monopsony Monopsony is a situation where there is one buyer – you have seen Monopoly, a case of one seller. Here we want to explore the impact on the.
Labor Market Equilibrium
2014 Milwaukee Brewers Franchise/Roster Evaluation By: Philip Sophinos, Professor: James Wible 2014 Milwaukee Brewers Franchise/Roster Evaluation By: Philip.
Introduction to Economics: Social Issues and Economic Thinking Wendy A. Stock PowerPoint Prepared by Z. Pan CHAPTER 9 WAGE DETERMINATION AND SUPERSTAR.
Contracts 3:C - 1(17) Entertainment and Media: Markets and Economics Contracts Between Talent and Entertainment Producers Appendix: A-Rod Deal.
More Competitive Balance. Invariance Principle Owners in baseball have made the claim that free agency has changed the competitive balance in baseball.
Sports Economics: Resource Market By: Matt Goldstein.
Screening and Signaling Edition 7: Chapter 12, pages Edition 6: Chapter 12, pages
SSFFL Player Acquisition and Retention Overhaul Proposal.
Who Decides Wage Rates?. WHO DECIDES WAGE RATES? 0 OBJECTIVES 0 Students will be able to: 0 Explain how sellers of labor and buyers of labor interact.
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 39 If We Build It, Will They Come? And Other Sports Questions.
VBS LESSON 10 “Player Management”. SPORTS MARKETING Learning Targets Understand how import the role of player selection and player development can be.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 40 If You Build it Will They Come? And Other Sports Questions.
Major League Baseball has been around since 1869 and is considered America’s Pastime because of this. Baseball is also the only major sport in America.
1919 New York Yankees Official Logo William Brennan Sports Finance February 6, 2014.
Quantile Regression By: Ashley Nissenbaum. About the Author Leo H. Kahane Associate Professor at Providence College Research Sport economics, international.
Consumer and Producer Surplus!!
Mr. Weiss Unit 3 Vocabulary Words 1. law of demand; 2. law of diminishing marginal utility; 3. price elasticity of demand; 4. equilibrium price; _____the.
NFL Draft Market Design Applications and Alternative Proposals Robby Yass and Gordon Hood.
RECRUITING HISTORY HOW THE DATA WAS GATHERED Using Rivals and 247Sports data, the Draft classes from were evaluated on a Star and.
Links HOME Options Pricing Model-based pricing of options is a relatively new phenomenon. Until the early 1970's option premiums were determined by offer.
Race and the Evaluation of Signal Callers in the National Football League David J. Berri (California State University, Bakersfield) Rob Simmons (Lancaster.
1.  exists when a single firm is the sole producer of a product for which there are no close substitutes. 2.
Quiz 1 The Demand for Resources Factor Market and Firm Graphs
By: Colmar, Kevin, Woolfran & Travis.  Salaries have always been in pro sports  Now salaries are running the sporting world.
Does higher club payroll in Major League Soccer directly relate to success? In US professional sports the big market teams or the teams that have the most.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 37 If We Build it Will They Come? And Other Sports Questions.
Monopolistic Competition CHAPTER 15 When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Describe.
Introduction In 1988, nearly 60% of the value of large deals- those over $100 million was paid for entirely in cash. Less than 2 % was paid for in stock.
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
VBS LESSON 10 “Player Management” NOTES
Unit 5: Competitive Balance
16 Monopolistic Competition CHAPTER. 16 Monopolistic Competition CHAPTER.
Chapter: 16 >> Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation Krugman/Wells Economics ©2009  Worth Publishers 1.
And the Lakers!! Economics, January 14, 2014
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
14 Firms in Competitive Markets P R I N C I P L E S O F
Chapter 4 Business of Sport
Economics of Sports Unit 5: Competitive Balance.
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
Demand, Supply, and Markets
ECON 211 ELEMENTS OF ECONOMICS I
CHAPTER 10 OUTLINE 10.1 Monopoly 10.2 Monopoly Power 10.3 Sources of Monopoly Power 10.4 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power 10.5 Monopsony 10.6 Monopsony.
Equilibrium (cont’d).
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
Chapter 6: Estimating demand and revenue relationships
Rodney Fort's Sports Economics
Factor Markets Unit VII.
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
Purpose of Sports? Baseball vs. Football
The Demand for Resources (And Monopsony)
Entertainment and Media: Markets and Economics
Supply and equilibrium
Profit-Maximizing Level for Mini-Z
Expected Value Lesson Essential Question:
Chapter 9: Setting the list or quoted price
Methods Results Conclusion Introduction Research Question References
Monopoly A monopoly is a single supplier to a market
Economic Analysis of Firm Operations of Atlanta United FC
Presentation transcript:

Oakland Raiders: Salary Analysis Doug Rose, Economics of Sports, Spring 2019, University of New Hampshire Introduction Data and Methods Analysis Conclusions The Oakland Raiders had a winning percentage of just .250 in 2018. There has been a lot of noise regarding adding talent and impending high draft picks. The goal is to take a deeper dive in order analyze the potential outcome of these moves: whether they are truly win maximizing or simply increasing demand for profit. Theories include Bilateral monopoly, Superstar Economics, and Lorenz curve. The main analysis of salary structure came in the form of salary distribution. Correlation between high performing teams and a more balanced distribution was found. Comparing the 2018 and 2019 Raiders shed light on the direction of the team’s performance. Running superstars (QB’s) against salary allowed for a simple view of which teams overpaid for their superstar. Some teams were able to underpay (monopsony power) and gained an unpredicted superstar. The Data was taken from www.spotrac.com for the salary analysis. Figure 3: The Raiders were victim to superstar economics and overpaid for a slightly better product. The team added more depth to lessen the need/gamble on one sole superstar, increases likelihood to win. Rookie contracts are a form of monopsony power and provide teams with cheap, high potential players. Top Teams appear to have more evenly distributed salary among their top 10 players on the roster. The QB, Derek Carr is an overpaid, under performer that must be given supporting talent or let go to free up cap space (Rookie QB Contract). Better resembles top teams in terms of distribution, holding 3 first round picks (monopsony power, cheap), have real chance for deep playoff run. The Raiders distribution highlights a deeper “sag” on the lorenz curve (Figure 1) than the top contenders. Their top player signed the highest salary deal (at the time) and has since skewed their distribution. Player Wages Figure 4: Teams are the only buyer in the market (Monopsony) and players are the only seller (Monopoly) setting up a bilateral monopoly scenario in the league. The distribution of salary via Lorenz curve is another theory being used. The economics of superstars are also at play as teams are willing to pay substantially more for marginally better talent. This poses a problem for teams that bet big and watch as their prized talent underperforms. Results Figure 3, 4 : The raiders in 2018 paid Derek Carr almost $5 million more than the average #1 player cap hit as compared to the top 5 teams of 2018. There gamble on a superstar left less money for mid range talent. In 2019, they have acquired top talent such as Antonio Brown, Trenton Brown, Tyrell Williams, and 3 first round draft picks. Additionally, they get to pay Derek Carr slightly less ($2.5 million) – money that can be used to add supporting characters. Figure 5: Logically, the best quarterback should earn the most… all the way to the 32nd earning the least. There is some early correlation in the 2,4,5,6,7 rankings but no real correlation after that. Major Franchises have locked in talent and pay accordingly while the rest gamble high or low and try to get what they pay for/ get lucky on high performers. Having a slightly cheaper year with Carr, trading Khalil Mack, and adding top talent in the 2-7 range, has allowed the Raiders’ Lorenz curve (Figure 1) to show more equal distribution than the Average top 5 teams of last year. Figure 1: The Lorenz curve shows the equal earnings with the black line. The further the sag, the more unequal of pay distribution. Figure 5: NFL Salary Cap Oakland Raiders Salary Cap has been steadily rising, slated for 188.2 million in 2019 Teams cannot exceed this limit without penalty, must use at least 89% of cap (Average over 4 years). Salary distribution is roughly: top 1/3 makes 2/3. Figure 2: The Economics of Superstars. The demand for an average quarterback is D0 but the demand for a marginally better quarterback is much greater at D1 QB end of season ranking data being run against salaries for each quarterback. Players were ordered by their rankings, with the expected line of reasonable correlation shown above. 65% of the Teams below this line had a winning record while 23% of teams above the line had a winning record.