First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Tomasz Szumlak (University of Glasgow) Epiphany 2010, Jan 2010, Krakow, Poland 1 Status of the LHCb experiment Outline Introduction to the LHCb.
1 The LHCb Vertex detector 15/9/2003 Physics –Goals –Properties and consequences LHCb –Overview of the detector Vertex –Specifications –Silicon stations.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6 14 th September Outline: Introduction to LHCb and VErtex LOcator (VELO) Status of VELO Beamtests Upgrades Summary LHCb.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Olaf Behrendt on behalf of the VELO group Novosibirsk,
Chris Parkes for VELO software Group VELO Software Overview & Shutdown Planning Organisation Milestones 3 Critical Areas.
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
A novel approach to detector calibration parameter determination and detector monitoring Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb VELO Group CHEP 2010,
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Commissioning the LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Mark Tobin University of Liverpool On behalf of the LHCb VELO group July 28, 2008Vertex 2008: 17th International.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Use of Silicon Detectors for Proton Diagnostics Tomasz Cybulski
12 th LECC, Valencia Sep 2006Aldo F. Saavedra 1 The Vertex Detector of LHCb - VeLo Aldo F. Saavedra Glasgow University On behalf of the VeLo group.
First collisions in LHC
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
On behalf of the LHCb VELO project
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
ALICE – First paper.
Simulated vertex precision
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
Vertex, Track Reconstruction & Luminosity Monitoring at LHCb
The LHC collider in Geneva
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
VELO Software Status Some highlights of recent work
LHCb VErtex LOcator ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Status of the LHCb experiment
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Luminosity Measurement in the
Presentation transcript:

First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance Dec. 2009 for LHCb VELO group Vienna Conference 2010

LHCb is a dedicated experiment to study flavour physics at the LHC Introducing LHCb LHCb is a dedicated experiment to study flavour physics at the LHC Search for New Physics in quantum loop processes CP violation and rare decays allowing to probe beyond the LHC energy frontier B decay vertices: a few tracks Primary vertex: many tracks ~50 10 mm + Detector requirements Efficient trigger for both leptonic and hadronic final states Excellent vertex finding and tracking efficiency Outstanding particle identification B0 - B- µ- µ D0

B Production LHC: pp-collisions @ 2714 TeV 2 fb-1 in data taking year of 107s, 1012 bb pairs LHCb: forward spectrometer 15-250 mrad acceptance η = 1.9-4.9 Interactions/crossing Pile-up at high luminosity choose 2x1032 cm-2 s-1 most events have single interactions LHC will reach early in run

The LHCb Detector Muon System RICH Detectors Vertex Locator Interaction Point Tracking System Calorimeters

The LHCb Detector Poster: Davide Pinci Muon System RICH Detectors Vertex Locator Interaction Point Tracking System Calorimeters Talk: Antonio Pellegrino Poster: Jeroen van Tilburg Talk: Miriam Calvo Gomez

Fully installed and commissioned Conducting first physics ! The LHCb Detector Muon System The LHCb Detector RICH Detectors Vertex Locator Interaction Point Tracking System Fully installed and commissioned Conducting first physics ! Calorimeters

How I wonder what you are Act 2: VELO Design Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star, How I wonder what you are

Velo Roles Velo Modules Primary / b decay Vertex reconstruction Standalone Tracking A principle tracking device for the experiment Second Level Trigger Fast tracking Velo Modules n-on-n & 1 n-on-p Two semi-circular designs R-measuring Phi-measuring double metal layer readout 2048 strips, 40-100 µm pitch .25 µm Analogue Readout TPG core Hybrid, CF paddles

VELO Layout injection p collision vacuum stable beams module RF box p z x y injection p 60 mm x y collision vacuum stable beams module RF box p partly overlapping sensors 2 retractable detector halves 21 stations per half with an R and  sensor Operates in secondary vacuum 300 μm foil separates detector from beam vacuum 8 mm from LHC beam 9

Production, Testing and Installation Vacuum Tank Electronics CO2 cooling Module production Testing Assembly Simulation & Reconstruction Installation Transport 1997-2007 Design to Installation 10

Act 3: Performance with first LHC data 10 years – that’s longer than I took to write my first symphony

First Tracks 2008 LHC synchronisation test Nucl. Instr. Meth. A Vol. 604, 2009, 1 LHC synchronisation test Beam collision with absorber Reconstruct tracks through VELO First Alignment & Resolution TED LHC accident September 2008 2008-2009 Commissioning & Optimisation First Event 17:33 22nd Aug 2008

Non Zero Suppressed data Data Processing FPGA processing 106 parameters Bit-perfect emulation in full software Low rate non-zero suppressed data Off-line optimise algorithm performance Non Zero Suppressed data FPGA / Emulation Pedestal Subtraction Cross-talk Removal Common Mode Subtraction Reordering Common Mode Subtraction Clusterisation Raw Event

Time Alignment Tune front-end chip sampling time Optimise for Maximum signal Minimum spillover Next & previous Each sensor adjusted separately: time of flight cable length R sensors Phi sensors

Alignment 1 Velo moved for each LHC injection Decay length measurement Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A596 (2008) 157-163 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A596 (2008) 164-171 Velo moved for each LHC injection Decay length measurement Alignment is key Motion system resolver position updated in reconstruction Track based alignment in three stages 2.4 µm Sensor x,y Alignment (biased Residual)

Vertices Contributions from collisions & Beam-gas Beam-gas removed with Bunch ID and Vertex cuts in analyses in this talk Closed to ±15mm Beam-gas blue/red Collisions green d

Alignment 2 Y x X Align two halves by fitting positions of primary vertices using tracks in each half X, Y translations ± 10 m Z translations ± 30 m Carbon-Fibre Expansion ~ 1µm/oC Using absorber collision data at higher T. Data taking at stable T

Cluster ADCs S/N = 20:1 Cluster finding efficiency = 99.5 % Track extrapolation, full area Reprocessed Data VELO Preliminary One dead chip in full system ! ADC value VELO Preliminary Phi sensors R sensors

Single Hit Resolution Detector resolution from corrected residuals 7 µm resolution, angle average, at 40 µm pitch 6-12o angle tracks Track angle Resolution improves as charge sharing increases Weighted cluster centre

Impact Parameters Key Physics quantity in identifying long lived B meson decay Data - + 10 mm B0 Primary Vertex simulation Velo preliminary Already reasonable agreement with simulation over primary momentum range Velo at 15mm open Distance between track and PV IP

KS and Λ Without VELO Tracking detectors were well calibrated at the start-up ! σ = 11.0 ± 0.4 MeV/c2 M(Ks) = 496.9 ± 0.3 MeV/c2 M(KsPDG) = 497.7 MeV/c2 σ = 3.1 ± 0.2 MeV/c2 M(Λ) = 1115.6 ± 0.2 MeV/c2 M(ΛPDG) = 1115.7 MeV/c2

KS and Λ With VELO Power of precision vertexing – even with VELO 15mm open σ = 4.3 ± 0.1 MeV/c2 M(Ks) = 497.3 ± 0.2 MeV/c2 M(KsPDG) = 497.7 MeV/c2 σ = 1.4 ± 0.1 MeV/c2 M(Λ) = 1115.6 ± 0.1 MeV/c2 M(ΛPDG) = 1115.7 MeV/c2

Summary First LHC operation demonstrated Preliminary VELO performance: 99.5% Cluster Finding Efficiency < 7 µm resolution 4 µm sensor alignment Further improvements anticipated Dec. 2009 Encore !

Velo Closing, Occupancy Extreme care taken on VELO closing Primary vertex monitoring Beam position monitors Data quality checks – occupancy, noise, common mode…. d