Rethinking Guardianship.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guardianship in Pennsylvania Robin Resnick Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania 1315 Walnut Street, Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA
Advertisements

Guardianship and Power of Attorney Training Crisis Response Network of Southern Arizona.
GUARDIANSHIPS: Protecting Your Rights. What is this training about? This training will help you learn: What a guardian does. What a guardian does. How.
The Work of the Missouri Guardianship Statutory Reform Task Force.
PREPARED BY KIM ALLSHOUSE, MSW, MA Private Guardianship for Adults with Developmental Disability.
Options in Decision Making Authority Presented by Barbara J. Byram
GUARDIANSHIP IN UTAH Legal Terms and Procedures. HOW DO I KNOW IF MY FAMILY MEMBER NEEDS GUARDIANSHIP? These questions are directly from the Utah Protective.
BY JOAN SACRAMENTO, MSW, JD, LF PINAL COUNTY PUBLIC FIDUCIARY POWER OF ATTORNEY vs. GUARDIAN AND CONSERVATOR.
Guardianship Proceedings in North Carolina for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities UNC School of.
Is Guardianship the Only Option? A Discussion about Guardianship and the Many Alternatives Hillary J. Dunn, Esq. Disability Law Center.
Information For Family Members West Virginia Mental Health Planning Council This information was developed to raise awareness of Psychiatric Advance Directives.
MAINTAINING AND ACHIEVING LEGAL AUTONOMY
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES PLANNING FOR MEDICAL CARE IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF DECISION-MAKING ABILITY.
1 Support needs of guardians and attorneys in Scotland Jan Killeen, Public Policy Director, Alzheimer Scotland.
Nursing Facility Transition and Diversion Module 2: Independent Living and Person-Centered Planning.
2015 Powers of attorney in Victoria Helen Rushford Coordinator, Advice & Education Service 22 October 2015.
1 Advance Directives For Behavioral Health Care Materials used with Permission From the National Resource Center on Psychiatric Advance Directives NJ Division.
DECISION MAKING RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
Adult Protective Services: Reporting Elder Abuse Policy, Practice, and Communication Robert Wallace Adult Services Program Manager June 2015.
Guardianship “The Court has the power to place total control of a person’s affairs in the hands of another. This great power creates the opportunity for.
ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES AND DECISION-MAKING
ELVILLE AND ASSOCIATES PRESENT: GUARDIANSHIP –
Advance Care Planning Care Coordination Collaborative April 5, 2017.
An overview of the process of Guardianship Do I need to think about this, what is the process and who can assist me? Emma Heagney civil solicitor Legal.
The Value of Person-Centered Planning
Great Expectations: Alternatives to Guardianship
Mental Capacity Act & Deprivation of Liberty
Unit 503: Champion equality, diversity and inclusion
Supported decision-making in wills and powers of attorney
Person-Centered Planning
Guardianship or Power of Attorney
Finding the “Rights” Balance
Senior Executive Officer, Individual & Family Support
Psychiatric Advance Directives
Rules of Superintendence Applicable to Guardianships
Guardianship as the Alternative
Supported Decision Making Evolution of an idea and Canadian experience Michael Bach Canadian Association for Community Living March 26,
Assisted Decision-Making
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING AND GUARDIANSHIPS Presented by: Community Health Law Project Erika Kerber, Esq. – Director of Litigation at Law and Disability.
Advance Care Planning.
Guardian Care Manager.
Transitioning into Adulthood
SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING: A NEW ALTERNATIVE TO GUARDIANSHIP
Informed Consent to Treatment
Guardian Advocacy vs. Guardianship?
Legal Rights and Decision-Making Scenarios
Psychiatric Advance Directives
Adult Protective Services Basic Skills Training
From Dementia Skilled Improving Practice NES/SSSC 2011
Navajo Adult Guardianship Act
Guardian Advocacy vs. Guardianship?
PERSON CENTERED APPROACH
Gem Complete Health Services
QCAT – dealing with adults with impaired capacity
The Magic Ages of Transition
Guardianship and Reasonable Alternatives
What do Personal Outcome Measures say about Rights?
Fundamental Rights and Responsibilities
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
RAISE Summit 2019 Charlie Walters, Able South Carolina
Jill Hanley, Public Administrator, St. Louis City
Obtaining Proof of Decision-Making Authority
Dovilė Juodkaitė Inclusion Europe conference, Vilnius 6 June, 2019
How to have the conversation about decision-making options
Important to Keep in Mind…
We are dedicated to improving the health and well-being of all of the people in the communities we serve. Memorial Hospital of Carbondale Herrin Hospital.
Rethinking Guardianship.
Assisted Decision Making: from informal supports to guardianship
Michigan Department of Community Health
Presentation transcript:

Rethinking Guardianship

What emotions lead to seeking Guardianship? LOVE FEAR CONCERN

National Core Indicators (2017-18) Guardianship levels for adults with an I/DD: I/DD Guardianship laws vary drastically by State. Nationally: 43% have a guardian Michigan: 77% have a guardian Wisconsin: 62% have a guardian

Every person can make choices and has a right to make decisions Every person can make choices and has a right to make decisions. People who have a cognitive or intellectual disability may express those choices/decisions in non-traditional ways. Any legal system or proceeding, which deprives an individual of her/his right to be accommodated and supported in choosing and making decisions and which appoints a substitute decision-maker based on tests of competence, makes that person vulnerable and deprives him/her not only of his/her right to self-determination, but also of other rights, which should be inalienable. Guardianship is a situation, recognized by law, under which one person or entity exercises power over and on behalf of another person. (“a ward”) Guardianship

Why avoid Guardianship? It simply does not do what one wants it to do! Avoid public declaration of incompetency No independence, dignity, freedom of choice Why avoid Guardianship? People deal with guardian – not person Expense – attorneys, hearings, evaluations Courts do not always follow law (partial vs. plenary, promote independence, etc.) It simply does not do what one wants it to do! Very difficult to modify or terminate Attorneys and G.A.L.s – very little training Corporate guardian problems- take money and independence

The vast majority of those who end up petitioning the court to appoint a guardian for some person are either related to the person or a friend. However, most petitioners do not come to the decision to seek guardianship on their own, but are encouraged to do so by someone else. Guardianship

“We have to reject the very idea of incompetence “We have to reject the very idea of incompetence. We need to replace it with the idea of ‘assisted competence’. This will include a range of supports that will enable individuals with cognitive disabilities to receive assistance in decision–making that will preserve their rights…” -Thomas Nerney, Director of Center for Self Determination for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Guardianship

Must recognize incongruity of removing a person’s rights to protect them Guardianship

NETWORK The # 1 thing Caring and involved family/friends Community networks/connections Unpaid Supports

According to the National Core Indicators of 2017-18: 22% of people with an I/DD don’t have friends outside of their paid supports or family. Michigan: 20% South Carolina: 11% 42% of people with an I/DD want more help to meet or keep in contact with friends. Michigan: 49% South Carolina: 29%

RELEASE OF INFORMATION The LEAST Intrusive Alternative Be connected and present Go to meetings/planning sessions

Person Centered Planning Person Centered Planning “Person-centered planning’ means a process for planning and supporting the individual receiving services that builds upon the individual’s capacity to engage in activities that promote community life and that honors the individual’s preferences, choices and abilities. The person-centered planning process involves families, friends, and professionals as the individual desires or requires” MCL 330.1700 (g) -Michigan’s Long Term Care Group Report and Recommendation, June 2000 Person Centered Planning

KEY POINTS: Person Directed Capacity Building Person Centered Network Building Outcome Based Community Accountability KEY POINTS:

Rituals and Routines What time do they leave for the days activities? What do they do when they get up in the morning? Rituals and Routines To understand a person’s rituals and routines, record what the Monday through Friday schedule looks like (without being intrusive) What do they eat for breakfast? How do they get ready for the day? What does the individual do when they arrive at school, program, work, etc.? What does the person do when they get home in the evening?

Rituals and Routines What things make a good day versus a bad day? You should also record what the person does on the weekends, because weekend activities are usually very different from those of the weekdays. Next, look over all that very detailed, specific information. Hopefully, you will have learned some general things about this person. What activities make that person happy? What activities make them sad or frustrated? What people or individuals do they enjoy spending time with? What are events or situations that make them angry or sad? What features of their environment are pleasant or stressful for the person?

Empowered Individuals A person-centered plan is meant to empower each individual to communicate what they want in life and to make decisions about the supports desired and needed to achieve their priorities and goals. When people are supported “one person at a time,” each individual is able to create their own life. The person-centered team or circle of support team assures that all needed supports are available. The power and decision-making rests with the person with the support of his or her own team. Empowered Individuals

Other alternatives to guardianship: Power of Attorney Patient Advocate Designation Representative Payee Community Supports Other alternatives to guardianship: KEY POINTS: Financial Supports Home Supports

Power of Attorney Appoint an Agent to handle certain decisions or support with making decisions Can be effective immediately Can be as broad or narrow as desired

Patient Advocate Designations (PADs) for Medical Decisions Exercisable only in event the person is unable to make their own medical decisions (certified by two physicians) Can be an individual 18 or over to exercise powers related to care, custody and medical treatment decisions of the person. Patient Advocate Designations (PADs) for Medical Decisions Includes the individual’s preferences regarding care and treatment. KEY POINTS: Necessary for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Michigan law also permits PADs for mental health decisions.

EXAMPLE

Representative Payee A person or organization designated through the Social Security Administration to handle a person’s Social Security check SSA has special paperwork and procedures for appointing a representative payee Can be changed or revoked only if SSA consents.

Let’s talk about Financial Supports Withdrawal Limit Let’s talk about Credit Card Opt-Out Banking Services Specific gift cards Ceiling limit amount Co-Signer Personal Money Manager Fiscal Intermediary Financial Supports KEY POINTS:

Medication assistance Meal delivery Let’s talk about Assistive technology/equipment Nutrition, diet, or mealtime support Service animals Home Supports KEY POINTS: Group homes/Roommates Home visitors Postal/Utility/Phone checks Medication assistance Home health services

Let’s talk about Community Supports Transportation assistance Service animals Employment/Volunteerism Religious/Spiritual Assistive technology Supports coordination Let’s talk about KEY POINTS: Community Supports Case management

What emotions lead to seeking Guardianship? LOVE FEAR CONCERN

Leah Ortiz, LMSW-Clinical Sources: The Arc Michigan, MDHHS, WDHHS, MPF Executive Director leah@thearccalhoun.org 269.966.2575 Sources: The Arc Michigan, MDHHS, WDHHS, MPF Materials should not be replicated without the permission of The Arc of Calhoun County

Who in WI can use Supported Decision-Making agreements? People who can use Supported Decision-Making agreements are defined within Wisconsin’s law as people with “functional impairments” and include: People of any age with degenerative diseases People of any age with conditions that substantially interfere with the ability to provide self care People with physical disabilities or conditions that substantially limits one or more of their major life activities People with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities People with mental health conditions Wisconsin’s law restricts the use of Supported Decision Making agreements to “a person with a functional impairment” The statutory definition of a “Person with a functional impairment includes” People with physical, developmental, or mental conditions that substantially limit one or more of an individual’s 1) Capacity for independent living, 2) Self direction, 3) Self care, 4) Mobility, 5) Communication, 6) Learning. (also referred to as major life activities) People experiencing degenerative diseases or other like incapacities. Conditions incurred at any age that substantially interfere with the Person’s ability to provide self-care. The statute DOES NOT require that the existence of a Functional impairment needs to be determined or “certified” by health care professionals

Honoring the Ability to Make Choices

Honoring the Ability to Make Choices

Opportunities for Choice-Making

Opportunities with Implementation in WI? Many families are interested in using this alternative but find they are pioneers as they interact with medical, financial, and other systems. Traditional referral sources to guardianship (schools, long-term care programs, courts) have been slow to integrate supported decision-making into their policies and practices. Wisconsin has a limited guardianship system with defined roles for guardians; often guardians do not act within this role; Guardian training is necessary.