Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Advertisements

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Air Traffic Management
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Traffic Processing Sequence — Tactical and Strategic Investigation of all the facts pertaining to the Air Traffic Services tactical and strategic traffic.
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Air Traffic Control System Team #3. Introduction The purpose of air-traffic control is to assure safe separation between en-route aircraft and the safe.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Impact of the IT Revolution on the Airspace System Dr. Philip Carrigan Strategic Programs Air Traffic Management Systems.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
MGMT 203 Airports, Airspace, and Air Traffic Control Management
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Scenario on airport works
International Civil Aviation Organization
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Airport-ANSP Growth & Efficiency ACDM-CATFM
FPAW 2016 Summer Meeting 3 August 2016 Louis Bailey.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Flight and Flow Information for a Collaborative Environment (FF-ICE)
Alicia Fernandes Mosaic ATM, Inc.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Cockpit participation in
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Long term vision for Air Traffic Systems CARATS
A Concept for Launch and Reentry Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Presentation transcript:

Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group Flight Use Case Draft Review October 25, 2018

Agenda Document Delivery Schedule Document Naming Convention Flight Use Case Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 The Current State 3 Future State

Delivery Schedule Use Case and Ops Context documents will continue to be worked on concurrently Deliver one domain Use Case Document every two months Continue delivering one SWIM service Operational Context Document per month Oct. 2018 ------- TAIS OCD Flight UCD FNS OCD Storyboard Nov. 2019 TAIS OCD Closeout Flight UCD Closeout FNS OCD ITWS OCD Storyboard Flow UCD Storyboard Dec. 2018 FNS OCD Closeout ITWS OCD Flow UCD ADPS OCD Storyboard Jan. 2019 ITWS OCD Closeout Flow UCD Closeout ADPS OCD TFMS Status OCD Storyboard MET UCD Storyboard Feb. 2019 ADPS OCD Closeout TFMS Status OCD MET UCD SFDPS General OCD Storyboard March 2019 TFMS Status OCD Closeout MET UCD Closeout SFDPS General OCD ISMC OCD Storyboard Aero UCD Storyboard April 2019 SFDPS General OCD Closeout ISMC OCD Aero UCD May 2019 ISMC OCD Closeout Aero UCD Closeout *OCD – Ops Context Document, UCD – Use Case Document

Use Case Document Domains Flight STDDS – SMES STDDS – TAIS TFMS – Flight SFDPS – Flight SFDPS – General Flow TFMS – Flow TBFM Meteorological ITWS STDDS – ADPS Aeronautical SFDPS – Airspace FNS Storyboard – 9/27 Draft – 10/25 Closeout – 11/29 Storyboard – 11/29 Draft – 12/27 Closeout – 1/24 Storyboard – 1/24 Draft – 2/28 Closeout – 3/28 Storyboard – 3/28 Draft – 4/25 Closeout – 5/23

Document Naming Convention All documents on SWIFT portal have been updated to a consistent naming convention per the SWIM program office

Flight Use Case Document Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 SWIM Flight Information Services 1.3 Overview of Use Case 2 The Current State 2.1 Problem Statement 2.2 Perspectives 2.3 Current State Operational Example 3 Future State 3.1 Future State Operational Example 3.2 Benefits 3.3 Conclusion Appendix A – Acronym Listing

TFMS, STDDS, SFDPS Flight Information 1 Introduction Decomposition of Flight Domain Data Elements TFMS, STDDS, SFDPS Flight Information Surface En Route International Terminal EDCT information Position updates ASDE-X data Airport surface surveillance data RVR Tower data link services Flight Plan Data Departure and Arrival time notifications Flight cancellations Boundary crossings Track position reports NCSM information Special activity airspace data Altimeter setting Filed flight plan Flight plan amendment Flight arrival notification Flight departure notification Flight plan cancellation Departure delay notification Flight track position report Oceanic track position report Notification that no additional reports will be received for a flight Target times for movement area entry Off-block time Take-off time Projected wheels-up time STARS data Track and flight plan data September 7, 2018

1.1 Purpose Short paragraph describing why use case is being developed Improve flight operations and flight management through integration of SWIM information

1.2 SWIM Flight Information Services Sourcing Traffic Flow Flight Information Service Briefly describe the services we will be using and where the data comes from Goal is to develop a common understanding of the data Data analysis will include traceability of data Includes discussion on how data is used in the NAS September 7, 2018

1.3 Overview of Use Case Decomposition of TFMS, SMES, TAIS, and SFDPS Flight Data by Phase of Flight Flight Plan Data (TFMS) Departure Notification (STDDS) Cancellation of filed flight plan (TFMS) Notification of Departure Delay (STDDS) Off-block Time (SMES) Take-off Time (TFMS) Project wheels-up time (SMES) Target Time for Movement area entry (SMES) Surface movement data (SMES) Boundary Crossings (TFMS) Flight Track Position Reports (TFMS) Oceanic Track Position Reports (TFMS) Amendment to Flight Plan (SFDPS) Altimeter setting (SFDPS) Special Activity Airspace (SFDPS) Hold information (SFDPS) Terminal Flight Track Position Report (TAIS) Notification of Arrival of a Flight (SFDPS) STARS data (TAIS) RVR (TAIS) Arrival Time (TFMS) Notification that no additional reports will be received for a flight (SFDPS) Arrival Departure En route Push Back / Taxiing Out Take-off / Departure Landing / Taxiing In Pre-Flight Cruise / En route / Oceanic Approach

2 The Current State NAS Operations Arrival Flight information received by combination of airline schedule data & filed flight plans Information is supplemented by departure and arrival messages, position reports etc. Information usually not updated until after the fact, creates a lack of awareness throughout the system, resulting in trajectories which are not always current Airspace User is unsure of the actual departure and arrival time which negatively impact gate assignments, passenger connections, crew and aircraft rotations Airspace User, airport and ATC planning is negatively affected due to lack of accurate position reports and times ATC Is monitoring aircraft track Has latest arrival time Has updated TMI which may be causing delays Does not have immediate access to airline filed delays AOC May not have current track Is not provided with updated arrival times Must file delays manually with DLA message Is not alerted to holding, metering, fix balancing or in trail restrictions. Arrival The intent of this slide is to help drive engaged discussion to identify the range of considerations in the current state We want to be sure we capture the hottest issues to the community for the written use case, and reference for future exchanges Landing / Taxiing In September 7, 2018

2.1 Problem Statement Present State Aircraft departs on Time ATC is receiving live updates on aircraft while AOC experiences a delay in obtaining current information Updated arrival times are continually created based on factors affecting flight Aircraft arrives per time predicted by ATC Departure En route Arrival ATC Perspective Aircraft departs on Time AOC receives delayed information from ATC and may not be aware of updated arrival times Aircraft arrives later than planned AOC works to reallocate ground resources to handle late aircraft Backup on taxiway due to unplanned congestion in non movement area causes delay on ground Departure En route Goal is to have engaged discussion around the problem to determine root cause Want to engage the producer to help reflect a common understanding of the problem we’re seeking to solve Arrival AOC Perspective Pre-Flight Push Back / Taxiing Out Take-off / Departure Cruise / En route / Oceanic Approach Landing / Taxiing In September 7, 2018

2.2 Perspectives Describes roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders Dispatchers/Pilots Airline Operations Management Airline Hub Control Center Airport Operator Traffic Flow Management Air Traffic Control International Data Provider Flight Data Services

2.3 Current State Operational Example Flight from KSEA to KJFK Pre-Departure Deicing required at KSEA but not forecast adding delays/gate management issues Scheduled SAA closes airspace on preferred route Weather impacts result in increased reroute cost (Canadian overflight) Post-Departure SAA cancelled, but processing delays don’t allow for airborne reroute in time to take advantage Flow restrictions in N90/ZNY result in airborne holding, crew does not have opportunity to contact AOC with updated ETA

3 Future State New Reality Based on New Information Service Aircraft pushes back AOC receives notification of aircraft pushback AOC receives updated surface movement, surveillance data and estimated departure time AOC receives departure time AOC receives continuously updated schedule route and aircraft position data Delay information, route, speed, altitude changes are communicated as they happen. Changes to SAA activity are communicated in real time. International flight data available AUs will have clear picture of flow programs (metering, fix balancing, MIT, etc.) impacting arrival time AOC is able to reallocate ground resources as needed based on accurate flight information Airport staff are able to better plan for identified delays Surface congestion is minimized Departure En route Arrival Slide intended to show what happens with getting access to data What does ATC/AOC operations look like, generally, with access to this new data Slide shows how the information service, with all the data elements, is now available and what the implications are It may be of value to coordinate this slide with a POC @ producer Pre-Flight Push Back / Taxiing Out Take-off / Departure Cruise / En route / Oceanic Approach Landing / Taxiing In September 7, 2018

3 Future State Once flight pushes, information continually shared so all users have same updated data Airline schedules & flight plan information will be continuously updated via SWIM with current schedule, route and aircraft position data and sent to ATC / airports Collaboration with ATC will be improved because Airspace Users, Airport and ANSP all have the same accurate picture to manage resources As changes occur during flight (e.g., route changes, speed and altitude changes, SAA, etc.), updates continue to be shared with Airspace Users & airports Airspace Users planning for gate usage, fleet management, crew resources is improved with precise arrival data Airport planning will improve with current operations picture for traffic using airport Slide intended to show what happens with getting access to data, as it pertains to the specific operation we’re talking about This describes the operation in the future, now with access to data September 7, 2018

3.1 Future State Operational Example Flight from KSEA to KJFK Pre-Departure Deicing required at KSEA but not forecast but surface metering allows for more predictable deicing/departure slot times Scheduled SAA closes airspace on preferred route Weather impacts result in increased reroute cost (Canadian overflight) Post-Departure SAA cancelled, notifications sent to stakeholders, pilot requests and receives preferred trajectory, saving time and money Flow restrictions in N90/ZNY result in airborne holding, updated ETA automatically sent to AOC

3.2 Benefits Improved Flight Data and Sharing of information with stakeholders will allow Airspace Users and airports to know precisely when aircraft will depart and arrive. This enables: Improved decision making concerning aircraft fuel efficiency Improved diversion management Improved gate management Improved flight crew management Improved ground crew management Improved delay management Improved fleet management Improved customer experience Improved TFM system performance Improved airport effectiveness This slide is intended to identify the anticipated benefits associated with our understanding of the solution Goal is to identify some way to validate the magnitude of the improvement seen with the benefit Intent of this slide is to validate these and identify whether there are additional benefits not identified here September 7, 2018

3.3 Conclusions Many Objectives, One Mission: Flight Information Air Traffic Control: Responsible for safe and efficient use of airspace, maximizing airspace use and runway efficiency Success is defined by maximum use of runways and airspace, effective strategic planning, and minimal use of tactical interventions that add delay to flights Airline Flight Ops: Responsible for ensuring regulatory compliance, ensuring on-time operations, managing gate and crew resources, maintaining flight schedules, fleet management, and applying the airline business model Success is defined by predictable on-time operations, adherence to schedules, effective gate, crew, and fleet management. End result is a positive customer experience. Airports: Provide a safe environment for flight and surface operations, provide ramp control, ensure airport resources are available (runways, taxiways, ramps) at times that meet Airspace Users and ATC requirements. This identifies the metrics and initiatives they identified for us during the first meeting, that could be addressed this solution I want them to see how we’re linking what’s important to them to what we’re providing them with the data sets September 7, 2018

References SWIFT Focus Group Website http://connect.lstechllc.com/index.cfm/main/opconfocusgroup Please review Flight Use Case Document and provide feedback by November 16th, 2018 http://connect.lstechllc.com/files/Flight%20Use%20Case%20Draft%20%20v0.4_20181025.docx Next meeting will be November 29th, 2018 Will close out Flight Use Case Document Please have Flight SMEs available for comment Will present Flow Use Case Storyboard Contacts Jay Zimmer (jay.zimmer@lstechllc.com) Felisa White (felisa.white@faa.gov)