Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Brussels, 5th May

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
Advertisements

THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
Wetlands in the Water Framework Directive main arguments and issues Bruxelles January 29, 2003.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
SCG MEETING, BRUSSELS 18th FEBRUARY, Dicembre 2004 Water Scarcity Drafting Group lead: France & Italy.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
State of Implementation of CEA in Germany
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
WG 2B IRBM Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Paris, 2003
Activity on WFD and Agriculture
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Pilot River Basin Outcome Report of Phase 1b.
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Rome, 12nd June
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
"Financing Natura 2000 Guidance and Workshops”
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands What happened since the last Meeting
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands
Outcome of 2^ Seminar of the WG 2.7 Roma, January
INTEGRATED TESTING OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS IN PILOT RIVER BASINS
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
Wetlands and the Water Framework Directive
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
WFD and Hydro-morphology
Which is the real scope of the Guidance ?
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Workshop on Biodiversity and Water
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Water scarcity and droughts Expert Network Progress Report
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
CIS Acitivity Env Objectives and Exemptions
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
WG Integrated Testing in Pilot River Basins
WG 2B IRBM Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Strategic Co-ordination Group Meeting, Brussels, 21st February, 2003.
Progress on the elaboration of CIS guidance document on E-Flows
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
UK Technical Advisory Group
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
Guidance Document - Generic Outline
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
E-flow guidance and groundwater
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Water Framework Directive
CIS Expert group on WFD & Agriculture Nitrates Directive and Water Framework Directive Edinburgh 10th October 2012 Luisa Samarelli DG ENV Agriculture,
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Update on Derogation Reporting
Environmental Objectives and Exemptions State of Play
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Brussels, 5th May

Participants to the discussion Austria; Bulgaria; Czech Republic; Denmark; Flanders; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland; Italy (Leader) Lithuania; Romania, Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; UK; Finland, Netherlands Commission; EEB; WWF; Evaluwet

Objective of the work according to the ToR endorsed in Copenhagen Elaborate the common understanding on the requirements of the WFD regarding wetlands Identify the role of wetlands in the WFD and in particular in relation to the programmes of measures Link these activities with other Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) guidance, by preparing generic text on wetlands for use in existing guidance documents Address problems and obstacles for the consideration of wetlands in the river basin management and elaborate solutions. Identify and take forward a process for integrating wetlands into the pilot river basin exercise and other future activities of the CIS.

Common Text Wetland ecosystems are ecologically and functionally significant elements of the water environment…... Relevant definitions are developed in CIS horizontal guidance documents on water bodies and are further considered in a guidance on wetlands. Pressures on wetlands…… The relevance of wetlands within programmes of measures is examined in the horizontal guidance paper on wetlands.

Drafting Processes January 2003: Draft 1.0 circulated to WGMs 29th January 2003: First Meeting in Brussels WGMs sent comments on chapters I,II&ToC Draft 2.0 Presented to the SGC (21th Feb.) SGC sent comments on Draft 2.0 Draft 2.1 Sent to the WGMs (13th March) Some WGMs sent comments

Discussion at the SCG (5th May) Drafting Process (Cont.) 24 March 2003: Second Meeting in Rome: WWGs discussed Vers. 2.1 Draft 3.0 Sent to WWGMs (2nd April) WWGs sent comments on Draft 3.0 Draft 4.0 (Final) Stored in CIRCA and sent to WGMs and SCG ( 24th April) Discussion at the SCG (5th May)

2. IDENTIFYING WETLANDS UNDER THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Table of Contents FOREWORD 1. INTRODUCTION 2. IDENTIFYING WETLANDS UNDER THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE 3. WFD ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND WETLANDS 4. WETLANDS AND THE IMPACTS AND PRESSURES ANALYSIS 5. THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES AND WETLANDS 6. MONITORING AND WETLANDS

IDENTIFYING WETLANDS UNDER THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Ecosystems relevant to the achievement of WFD objectives Ecosystems significantly influencing the quality or quantity of water reaching surface water bodies or surface water connected to surface water bodies Wetlands River, lake, transitional water or coastal water body Terrestrial ecosystems directly dependent on groundwater bodies Small elements of surface water not identified as water body but connected to surface water body Riparian, shore or intertidal zone hydromorphological quality elements of surface water bodies

IDENTIFYING WETLANDS UNDER THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Rivers Terrestrial ecosystems directly dependent on groundwater for their water needs Lakes and small elements of surface water Hydromorphological quality elements of surface water bodies Transitional & coastal waters

WFD ENVIRONMENTALOBJECTIVES AND WETLANDS Summary of the main requirements Surface waters objectives and wetlands The relationship between wetland systems and Heavily Modified Water Bodies Wetlands and Groundwater Wetlands in relation to transitional and coastal waters Protected Areas and the Water Framework Directive

WETLANDS AND THE IMPACTS AND PRESSURES ANALYSIS Relevant Objectives in the Impacts and Pressures Analysis Understanding relevant pressure-impact relationships Understanding the impact of future pressures Pressure screening and threshold values

THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURE AND WETLANDS Basic and supplementary measures Wetlands in the design of measures Cost Effectiveness 'Significantly Better Environmental Options' Wetland Creation, Maintenance and Enhancement to Achieve WFD Objectives

MONITORING AND WETLANDS ANNEX II: WETLANDS FUNCTIONS ANNEX III: RECENT PROJECTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION

Specific comments received on Version 3.0

Identifying wetlands under the WFD (Chapter 2); Further Obligations deriving from Community legislation (Chapter 3.2); Protected Areas and the Water Framework Directive (Chapter 3.6); Programme of Measures & Wetlands (Chapter 5); Cost effectiveness (formerly: Identifying Cost effective Measures) (Chapter 5.3)

‘Habitats’ and ‘Wild Birds’ Ramsar and wetlands Commission Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) ‘Habitats’ and ‘Wild Birds’ Open issues? Basic and Supplementary Measures Monitoring no strict requirement, IMPRESS, groundwater and dependent ecosystems