© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Table 3. Shared Governance

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Appendix A Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Experience of primary school teachers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

post intervention (n=60)

reported practices score pre/post intervention

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. K-T Diagram for Bicycle Seat

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Response on Indicators for Emotion focused Coping Techniques

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60)

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 2. Comparison of perceived SE means scores pre and post remediation program (n=17) 95% Confidence Interval (CI) Item Pre-remediation program (SD) Post-remediation program (SD) Lower Upper Mean Difference Effect Size (r) I have the ability to gain the knowledge I need to succeed this year 3.41 (0.50) 4.35 (0.70) -1.27 -0.60 -0.94‡ 0.61 I have the ability to acquire the skills I need to succeed this year 3.11 (0.49) 4.29 (0.69) -1.50 -0.84 -1.18‡ 0.70 I am confident in approaching patients during my clinical placements 3.00 (1.00) 4.29 (0.58) -1.69 -0.89 -1.29‡ 0.62 I am comfortable with asking my clinical supervisors questions 3.05 (0.96) 4.12 (0.69) -1.72 -0.39 -1.06‡ 0.54 I can explain medical information to patients 2.94 (0.75) 4.12 (0.60) -1.59 -0.76 -1.17‡ 0.66 I am able to get the information I need from patients 4.29 (0.59) -1.75 -0.94 -1.35‡ 0.71 I am comfortable with discussing emotional topics with patients 2.71 (0.77) 3.82 (0.95) -1.51 -0.71 -1.12‡ I have the skills to help me deal with most stressful situations I encounter 2.88 (0.69) 3.94 (0.83) -1.48 -0.63 0.57 I feel comfortable asking for help if I need it 2.76 (0.75) 4.05 (0.83) -1.73 -0.85 0.63 I can make a differential diagnosis from available information 3.47 (0.51) -0.90 -0.65‡ 0.50 I feel able to monitor my diagnostic thinking and make adjustments during a patient interview 3.24 (0.75) -1.61 -0.49 Total scores 33.53 (4.98) 45.71 (5.13) -14.52 -9.83 -12.18‡ 0.77 ‡ P<0.001 Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli et al. Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Short- and Long-Term Academic Improvements for Underperforming Medical Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 6, 168-176. doi:10.12691/education-1-6-1 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.