Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing Three or More Groups: Multiple Comparisons vs Planned Comparisons Robert Boudreau, PhD Co-Director of Methodology Core PITT-Multidisciplinary.
Advertisements

From the homework: Distribution of DNA fragments generated by Micrococcal nuclease digestion mean(nucs) = bp median(nucs) = 110 bp sd(nucs+ = 17.3.
Cañon City Weather Averages Boulder Weather Averages Denver Weather Averages Colorado Springs Weather Averages Fort Collins Weather Averages Total Avg.
ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.
GRNmap Testing Analysis Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 10, 2015.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 3, 2015.
Data Analysis and GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 24, 2015.
Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.
Index Slide 2-5: Statistical testing results 6-14: Clustering results 15-17: GRNsight visualization of YEASTRACT results 18-20: GRNmap output visualization.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 17, 2015.
Within Strain ANOVA WTdHAP4 p < (38.4%)2387 (38.6%) p < (24.7%)1489 (24.1 %) p < (13.8%)679 (11.0%) p < (7.25%)240.
Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.
Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.
Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez.
Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.
PLUS.
2015 Comparison.
2006 NSRS Deployments* * Note: Post PRR650 Implementation (07/01/2006)
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S
Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05
Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
Substance P Enhances the Production of Interferon-induced Protein of 10 kDa by Human Keratinocytes in Synergy with Interferon-γ  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi.
Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains
Significance Table from Anova Test
Fig. 2. Mechanism of PD-L1 down-regulation in NOD HSPCs.
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Week 11 Assignment Figures
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
Influence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order specification on overall survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (log rank test p
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Percentages of specific p-value data
Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data
Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5
Week 11 Assignment Figures
(Within-Strain ANOVA)
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3
Week 14 – Network Modeling
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Indomethacin worsens the effects of C. difficile infection in mice.
Generation of stable 5′ ends in wild type and rneE
 ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Call of the Wild Test Analysis
Percentages of specific p-value data
Distribution plot of the differentially expressed genes.
Unchanged worm burden and microfilaremia in basophil-deficient mice compared with their basophil-competent littermates. Unchanged worm burden and microfilaremia.
Biphasic ambulatory activity and reduced avoidance in Id2−/− mice.
Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected
(A) Western blot probing nuclear extract from wild-type (wt) and the newly generated ACF1 mutant (AcfC) embryos (0–16 h). (A) Western blot probing nuclear.
MiRNA expression profiling in adipocytes from wild-type (WT) and leptin-deficient ob/ob mice. miRNA expression profiling in adipocytes from wild-type (WT)
Presynaptic OSN GABA receptors accelerate behavioral responses to odor pulse termination. Presynaptic OSN GABA receptors accelerate behavioral responses.
CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured SGBS cells during adipocyte differentiation. CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured.
Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum-specific seropositive antigen responses in adults and children. Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum-specific seropositive.
CT production profiles of single-SNP strains and double-, triple-, and quadruple-SNP combination strains. CT production profiles of single-SNP strains.
Loyola Marymount University
Effects of d-xylose or sucralose (control) with or without sitagliptin on gastric emptying (half-emptying time [T50]) (n = 12). Effects of d-xylose or.
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Phage activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (LESB65 wild type and adapted strain NP22_2) infection in the murine lung. Phage activity against Pseudomonas.
Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence estimates of self-reported cancer according to diabetes types among men (A) and women (B) (BRFSS 2009). Unadjusted and.
Fig. 2. Mechanism of PD-L1 down-regulation in NOD HSPCs.
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Presentation transcript:

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron Wild Type vs. Δcin5 Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Grand Comparison ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 2378 (38.4%) 2034 (32.86%) p < 0.01 1527 (24.7%) 1198 (19.36%) p < 0.001 860 (13.9%) 576 (9.31%) p < 0.0001 460 (7.4%) 288 (4.65%) B-H p < 0.05 1656 (26.8%) 1177 (19.02%) Bonferroni p < 0.05 228 (3.68%) 119 (1.92%)

NSR1 Comparison ANOVA WT CIN5 Unadjusted 0.000000014 Bonferroni-corrected 0.000089 B&H-corrected 0.011 Average log fold change at t = 15 3.07 Average log fold change at t = 30 3.39 Average log fold change at t = 60 3.41 Average log fold change at t = 90 -1.41 Average log fold change at t = 120 -0.57

And

Only

Plus

“And” Data

Binding Data Only

“Plus” Data