Cell Cytoskeleton and Tether Extraction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lever-Arm Mechanics of Processive Myosins Yujie Sun, Yale E. Goldman Biophysical Journal Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 2011) DOI: /j.bpj
Advertisements

Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages L67-L69 (April 2008)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Hyperosmotically Induced Volume Change and Calcium Signaling in Intervertebral Disk Cells: The Role of the Actin Cytoskeleton  Scott Pritchard, Geoffrey.
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Characterizing Cell Adhesion by Using Micropipette Aspiration
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Fast Label-Free Cytoskeletal Network Imaging in Living Mammalian Cells
Volume 92, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
The Cytoskeleton Regulates Cell Attachment Strength
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
A Programmable Optical Angle Clamp for Rotary Molecular Motors
Cholesterol Depletion Mimics the Effect of Cytoskeletal Destabilization on Membrane Dynamics of the Serotonin1A Receptor: A zFCS Study  Sourav Ganguly,
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Masataka Chiba, Makito Miyazaki, Shin’ichi Ishiwata 
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Pancreatitis Associated Protein I (PAP-I) Alters Adhesion and Motility of Human Melanocytes and Melanoma Cells  Christine Valery, Jean-Jacques Grob, Patrick.
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Arpita Upadhyaya, Michael P. Sheetz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
K. Venkatesan Iyer, S. Pulford, A. Mogilner, G.V. Shivashankar 
Quantitative Image Restoration in Bright Field Optical Microscopy
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Single-Cell Adhesion Tests against Functionalized Microspheres Arrayed on AFM Cantilevers Confirm Heterophilic E- and N-Cadherin Binding  Chawin Ounkomol,
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
In Situ Mechanical Analysis of Myofibrillar Perturbation and Aging on Soft, Bilayered Drosophila Myocardium  Gaurav Kaushik, Alexander Fuhrmann, Anthony.
The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Probing the Cell Peripheral Movements by Optical Trapping Technique
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Felix Kohler, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Cell-Shape Regulation of Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Hydrodynamic Determinants of Cell Necrosis and Molecular Delivery Produced by Pulsed Laser Microbeam Irradiation of Adherent Cells  Jonathan L. Compton,
ECM Cross-Linking Regulates Invadopodia Dynamics
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Ai Kia Yip, Pei Huang, Keng-Hwee Chiam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Fast Label-Free Cytoskeletal Network Imaging in Living Mammalian Cells
William J. Galush, Jeffrey A. Nye, Jay T. Groves  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Sandeep Kumar, Alakesh Das, Amlan Barai, Shamik Sen 
Presentation transcript:

Cell Cytoskeleton and Tether Extraction B. Pontes, N.B. Viana, L.T. Salgado, M. Farina, V. Moura Neto, H.M. Nussenzveig  Biophysical Journal  Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 43-52 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044 Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the tether extraction experiment. (a) Initial equilibrium position. (b) Change in equilibrium position due to sample movement. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tether extraction experiment in Fibroblast NIH 3T3 cell. (a) Initial situation, t = 0. (b) Final situation, showing the image of the extracted tether in bright field with ImageJ shadow north processing filter applied. Scale bar for panels a and b is 10 μm. (c) Montage of images from the video recording (see Movie S1). (d) The force curve of the tether extraction experiment, with numbers in the plot indicating the corresponding bead position in panel c; scale bar 1 μm. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Presence of F-actin inside the tether. In control cells. (a1) Actin staining (phalloidin-FITC. (a2) Zoom showing the presence of F-actin in the extracted tethers. (a3) Bright-field/fluorescence merge image from NIH 3T3 cells. (b1–b3) Same as panel a for cytoD cells. All the scale bars are 10 μm. (c) Plot representing the green-level fluorescence (GL) of each condition, as indicated in the legend, normalized by the green-level fluorescence inside the control cell (GLcontrol(cell)) (open bar). Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cell-bead immersion angle measurements using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (a) SEM panoramic image of the entire cell showing the beads attached to its surface. Scale bar: 10 μm. (b) High magnification SEM of a bead showing the immersion angle (θ) in the cell. Scale bar: 1 μm. (c) Bright-field image of an optically trapped bead adhered to a Cytochalasin-D-treated cell. The adhesion angle measured in this case is 38° in agreement with SEM measurements. Scale bar: 10 μm. (d) Results for angle measurements in control (shaded) and Cytochalasin-D-treated cells (open). Standard errors were used as error bars. At least 20 different experiments for each situation (p > 0.1 means no significant statistical differences using the t-test). Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Tether radius measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (a) SEM representative image of a tether extracted from NIH 3T3 cell in control group. Scale bar: 1 μm. (b) SEM representative image of a tether extracted from Cytochalasin-D-treated NIH 3T3 cell. Scale bar: 1 μm. (c) Plot profile of the gray-level intensity in the tether for panel a. The plot profile was adjusted to half-hyperbolic tangent fits and the radius was determined as indicated in Eqs. 6 and 7. (d) Results for the tether radius (R) in control (shaded) and Cytochalasin-D-treated cells (open). At least 10 different measurements were performed for each situation (∗∗∗ means p < 0.001 in t-test statistics). Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Bead coating does not alter force characteristics in Fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells. Results for maximum force values (a) and tether force values (b) using 1.52-μm radius normal and carboxylated polystyrene beads coated with different proteins as indicated in the figure legends. Standard errors were used as error bars. At least 20 different experiments for each bead-coating situation (no significant statistical difference was found for each group using the ANOVA test). Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 43-52DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.044) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions