Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Carmela Sidrauski, Jeffery S Cox, Peter Walter  Cell 
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
A Specialized Nucleosome Modulates Transcription Factor Access to a C
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Jun Y. Fan, Danny Rangasamy, Karolin Luger, David J. Tremethick 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
RAD51 is essential for L. donovani.
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Yi Wei, Lanlan Yu, Josephine Bowen, Martin A Gorovsky, C.David Allis 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Repression by Ume6 Involves Recruitment of a Complex Containing Sin3 Corepressor and Rpd3 Histone Deacetylase to Target Promoters  David Kadosh, Kevin.
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Centromeric Nucleosomes Induce Positive DNA Supercoils
Gcn4 Activator Targets Gcn5 Histone Acetyltransferase to Specific Promoters Independently of Transcription  Min-Hao Kuo, Elmar vom Baur, Kevin Struhl,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
A Transient Histone Hyperacetylation Signal Marks Nucleosomes for Remodeling at the PHO8 Promoter In Vivo  Hans Reinke, Philip D. Gregory, Wolfram Hörz 
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Rapid and Selective Remodeling of a Positioned Nucleosome during the Induction of IL- 12 p40 Transcription  Amy S Weinmann, Scott E Plevy, Stephen T Smale 
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Wu-Cheng Shen, Michael R Green  Cell 
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Histone H2A.Z Regulates Transcription and Is Partially Redundant with Nucleosome Remodeling Complexes  Maria Soledad Santisteban, Tatyana Kalashnikova,
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
ISWI Is an ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Remodeling Factor
A Stage-Specific Enhancer of Immunoglobulin J Chain Gene Is Induced by Interleukin-2 in a Presecretor B Cell Stage  Chang-Joong Kang, Colleen Sheridan,
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 495-505 (March 1998) Absence of Gcn5 HAT Activity Defines a Novel State in the Opening of Chromatin at the PHO5 Promoter in Yeast  Philip D Gregory, Andrea Schmid, Maasoumeh Zavari, Lin Lui, Shelley L Berger, Wolfram Hörz  Molecular Cell  Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 495-505 (March 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7

Figure 1 Effect of a GCN5 Deletion on Activity of the PHO5 Promoter Acid phosphatase activity is shown under (A) repressing (high Pi) and (B) activating (no Pi) conditions. The relevant genotypes of the strains are indicated. YS18 (wt), YS5189 (gcn5), YS30 (pho85), YS5309 (pho85/gcn5), YS31 (pho80), and YS5319 (pho80/gcn5). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 2 Gcn5 Dependence of PHO5 Promoter Variants The results for the activation of lacZ reporter plasmids in the presence or absence of phosphate for the wild-type (YS18) and gcn5 (YS5189) strains are shown. Values in (A) were determined in the presence or absence of phosphate and in (B) before (−galactose) and after (+galactose) induction in phosphate-containing media. The particular promoter constructs employed are indicated. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 3 Deletion of GCN5 Defines a Novel Chromatin Structure at the PHO5 Promoter (A) Nuclei isolated from the three strains, YS18, YS5319, and YS31, (relevant genotypes indicated) grown in the presence of phosphate were treated with 0.25 (lanes 1, 5 and 15), 0.5 (lanes 2,6 and 14), 1 (lanes 3,7 and 13), and 2 (lanes 4, 8 and 12) U/ml DNaseI for 20 min at 37°C. DNA was isolated, digested with ApaI, analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with probe D (Almer et al. 1986). Double digests of purified genomic DNA with ApaI/BstEII, ApaI/ClaI, and ApaI/BamHI shown in lanes 9, 10, and 11, respectively, serve as markers. The schematic on the left shows the positions of the restriction sites used for generating marker fragments together with the nucleosomes and is drawn approximately to scale. (B) The chromatin organization of the repressed PHO5 promoter, including the TATA box (T) and the positions of the Pho4-binding sites UASp1 and UASp2. Also shown are probe D and the location of the ApaI site used for indirect endlabeling. The nucleosomes removed under wild-type conditions are shown as open circles. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 4 Effect of Phosphate Starvation on the Chromatin Structure of the PHO5 Promoter in a gcn5/pho80 Background Nuclei isolated from the YS5319 (pho80/gcn5) and YS31 (pho80) strains grown in the presence or absence of phosphate indicated were treated with 0.25 (lanes 1, 5, and 15), 0.5 (lanes 2, 6, and 14), 1 (lanes 3, 7, and 13), and 2 (lanes 4, 8 and 12) U/ml DNaseI for 20 min at 37°C. DNA was analyzed as in Figure 3. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 5 Effect of a GCN5 Deletion on the Accessibility of Restriction Sites at the PHO5 Promoter Nuclei isolated from YS31 (GCN5/pho80), which is referred to as “wt”, and YS5319 (gcn5/pho80), referred to as “gcn5” and grown in the presence of phosphate, were treated for 30 min at 37°C with 50 U (left) or 200 U (right) of the restriction enzyme indicated. To monitor the extent of cleavage, DNA was isolated, cleaved with HaeIII, analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with probe D (see Figure 3). The positions of the restriction sites with respect to the nucleosomal organization of the repressed PHO5 promoter are shown schematically underneath. In all cases, the appearance of the lower band represents accessibility of the corresponding site. The nucleosomes that are perturbed during normal activation are shown as open circles. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 6 The Effect of Gcn5 HAT Domain Mutants on the Activation of the PHO5 Promoter (A) Diagram of yeast Gcn5, indicating the domains of the protein and position and protein sequence of conserved region I (Brownell et al. 1996). The substitution mutants, named according to the group of amino acids mutated to alanine, are shown in brackets. (B) The histone acetylation activities of the Gcn5 HAT domain mutants tested are shown as a percentage of wild type (Wang et al. 1998; and this study). The PHO5 promoter activity of these mutants in the gcn5/pho80 (YS5319) background is shown in units of acid phosphatase activity in the presence or absence of phosphate. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)

Figure 7 Mutation of Specific Residues Critical for Gcn5 HAT Activity Is Sufficient To Generate the Novel Chromatin Organization of the PHO5 Promoter (A) Nuclei isolated from the PKM, YIA, and KQL (see Figure 6) Gcn5 HAT mutant strains in a gcn5/pho80 background, grown in the presence of phosphate, were treated with 0.25 (lanes 1, 4, and 12), 0.5 (lanes 2, 5, and 11), and 1 (lanes 3, 6, and 10) U/ml DNaseI for 30 min at 37°C. DNA was analyzed as in Figure 3. (B) Nuclei isolated from YS30 (GCN5/pho80) denoted “wt,” YS5319 (gcn5/pho80) denoted “Δgcn5,” and the PKM, YIA, and KQL Gcn5 HAT mutant strains grown in the presence of phosphate were treated for 30 min at 37°C with 50 U (left) or 200 U (right) of ClaI. DNA was analyzed as in Figure 5. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 495-505DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80050-7)