Management of Student Progress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for Confirmation of Candidature
Advertisements

Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Research Students Centre CRICOS No 00213J Surviving Confirmation Semester 2 Gardens Point.
School of Physiotherapy Curtin University of Technology You are considering undertaking PhD or MSc by research study at the School of Physiotherapy Read.
Psychology Graduate Student Orientation. Graduate Students.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT FORM
BSc (Honours) Computing and Information Systems Part-time Course Code: 2172 Don McFall – Course Director Room 16J08.
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
Introduction to Postgraduate Candidature in the College of Science, Engineering and Technology Professor Felicity Roddick Associate Dean (Research and.
Implementing the new Workload Policy Heads of School Workshop April 2010.
ENROL THESIS REGISTRATION PROGRESS REPORTS (every 6 months) THESIS SUBMIISSION ORAL EXAMINATION Suspension of study Change of supervisor/topic/ department.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Supervisionof Ph.D. students Dejan Popovic
Best Practices for Graduate Supervision December 10, 2014 Your Role in Graduate Studies.
Academic Progress & Exclusion Information Sessions.
GRADUATE STUDIES: STUDENTS’ OBLIGATIONS AND EXPECTATIONS By Dr. Michael Wainaina Associate Dean, Graduate School.
What Expectations Does the University have of Supervisors? Professor Rod Devenish, Academic Director, MIGR.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
1 GRADUATE SCHOOL A Guide to the Academic Regulations What you need to know! Michael Frain, Graduate School Level Two, Foundation Building 15 November.
Confirmation of Candidature Progress Reports
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Academic Progress & Exclusion Information Sessions.
ENROL PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT THESIS SUBMISSION ORAL EXAMINATION Suspension of study Change of supervisor Study away from Christchurch Extension.
Policy and Procedures Ian S Burnett Student Research Culture Session – 29 April 2009.
Higher Degree Research Nearly Everything a Research Student needs to know Fiona Pearson Manager, HDR Development and Support Research Services March 2010.
Research Student Supervision – Update 2012 Dr Ann Hartley.
A Guide to the Academic Regulations
GRS Information Session
Management of Student Progress
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
Curtin Graduate Research School
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
Orientation for HDR Students Doctoral & Masters by Research
Progress Review.
HDR Supervisor Induction Role of the Supervisor
Orientation for HDR Students Doctoral & Masters by Research
Managing your PhD: part time students and staff
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Managing your PhD: part time students and staff
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
University of Newcastle
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
— How To Apply For A Research Degree And Scholarship
Orientation for HDR Students Doctoral & Masters by Research
PRC Information Session
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Management of Student Progress
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
Attribution…. Self Plagiarism – what to do for the thesis writing
Milestone 1(Candidacy): Preparing the Application & Research Proposal
Orientation for HDR Students Doctoral & Masters by Research
Progress Review.
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
Progression and Advancement
Progress Review.
Curricular Practical Training Workshop
University of Brighton
New Student Orientation
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Roles and Responsibilities
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
Attribution…. Self Plagiarism – what to do for the thesis writing
HDR Milestones Requirements and processes
Presentation transcript:

Management of Student Progress 23 November 2016 Management of Student Progress Garry T Allison March 2019

Doctoral Thesis “.. uncover new knowledge either by the discovery of new facts, the formulation of theories or the innovative reinterpretation of known data and established ideas…” 65,000 Thesis students in Australia almost 10,000 per year graduate with a Level 10 award (PhD). There are just over 40 Institutions that award Doctoral level qualifications

Today …. Milestones Setting expectations, essential facilities Opportunities for progress review Student-supervisor relationships Planning for success When things go wrong International student issues What happens next

Overview of the Research Degree Path Application for admission/enrolment Written research proposal Oral presentation School review Research Integrity ORCID HIT Milestone 1 (candidacy) (6 months) Sample of written work Oral presentation on progress and completion/dissemination plan (conference planning, authorship agreement) Milestone 2 (Mid-term) Milestone 3 (Pre-submission) Oral presentation – celebratory; supervisors nominate examiners At least 3 months before FEC Submission of Thesis & Examination Graduation

Current Students as at Dec 2018 ‘What milestones do I need to do?’ Milestone optional Completed > 3.5 years Completed > 1.5 years Candidacy approved? Enrolled? YES NO Milestones 1- Candidacy ✔ 2 - Midterm 3 – Pre-submission

Milestone #1 Completion of the Research Integrity training (on Blackboard) Masters - 5 page proposal Doctoral - 10 page proposal Presentation of research plan (*) Budget Timelines Risks/HIT Turnitin report (via Research Integrity) Data management plan See Milestones webpage for more Confirmation Tasks List tasks that will be achieved in the next 12 months. Must have a substantial written body of work.

Milestone #2 - Confirmation Milestones cont’d Milestone #2 - Confirmation Authorship agreement Pilot work Review, Methods paper? Conference /mobility plan Oral presentation Confirmation of Confirmation Tasks Plan for the next half of the doctoral thesis (*) Must include Travel / Mobility plan Milestone #3 - Pre-submission Oral presentation Oral presentation A pre-submission approval / acknowledgement not an oral defence/ examination of the thesis like most other Institutions .. But could mean that the thesis can not be submitted until the candidate demonstrates a understanding of the doctoral award.

Who is involved in the student candidature? There must be 2 committed people Peers, fellow HDR students Supervisor Co-supervisor Associate Supervisor Chair of Thesis Committee Director of Graduate Research (Postgraduate Coordinator) Head of School Graduate Research School GSOs

How things are progressing? Thesis Chair….. n.b. Not implemented Yet. The new role of the Thesis Chair is to talk to the student and the supervisors at each milestone time period (….and maybe more often). How things are progressing? What are the barriers and drivers for the student to reach the milestones in a timely manner? RU-OK - PhD?

Setting expectations: Milestones – Formal Processes Candidacy Midterm (confirmation) Oral presentation (Pre-sub v Defence) Setting expectations: Set expectations early Milestones Goals – short/medium/long term Meetings – how often? Who attends? Take notes at meetings – Email record Support What support will student need – training/language Budget for research support/travel Student emails summary and the next agenda / tasks with timelines etc.

Essential Facilities for HDR Students International Campuses – will need to be verified according to the contract and cost of research See Essential Facilities information – for links to Guidelines for Essential Facilities; and Research Support Fund Reimbursement List High cost courses Doctoral up to $4,000 at M1 & M2; Masters up to $2,000 at M1 & M2 Low cost courses Doctoral up to $2,800 at M1 & M2; Masters up to $1,400 at M1 & M2 Curtin Sarawak Allocations are in MYR Students must use Concur to claim reimbursements. Schools provide access to computer/printer/basic software; desk/chair; storage space; after hours access Support for Conference Attendance (Doctoral students only), $2,500 – usually after Milestone 2 See also Travel & Insurance for HDR’s One off $750 for MRes conversion students who have a Living stipend. Mobility awards – applied for at M#2. Must be taken before M#3. Open to Masters students

Scholarships for HDR Students Extensions of up to six months may be available where research delays are beyond a student’s control (refer Conditions of Award) New Australian Government RTP Scholarship Policy and Procedures Aust. Govt. RTP Fee Offset Scholarship Aust. Govt. RTP Stipend Scholarship Aust. Govt. RTP Allowance Scholarship What scholarships do HDR students receive? How long is a PhD scholarship?? Fee offset / Tuition Scholarship Living stipend Scholarship Top-ups of various forms Fee offset / Tuition Scholarship Living stipend Scholarship Top-ups of various forms 4 years FTE 3 years (+ 6mths) FTE

Scholarships for HDR Students Extensions of up to six months may be available where research delays are beyond a student’s control (refer Conditions of Award) New Australian Government RTP Scholarship Policy and Procedures Aust. Govt. RTP Fee Offset Scholarship Aust. Govt. RTP Stipend Scholarship Aust. Govt. RTP Allowance Scholarship

Reporting – APR; End User Report Annual Progress Report (APR): Every year ( April – needs top be done ) Enables student and Thesis Committee to assess the progress of the research project. The APR is a short online questionnaire. Separate reports for students and supervisors. Who completes? HDR students who were enrolled on or before 31 December in the previous year Students who do not submit their APR by the closing date will have their enrolment status changed to Absent Without Leave (AWOL). Students are emailed information and reminders - check OC once a week End User Survey Twice per year; compulsory Online survey – about 10 questions Students emailed information and reminders – check OC once a week

Reporting cont’d International Sponsored Students Report Online information: http://research.curtin.edu.au/postgraduate-research/current-research-students/international-sponsored-student-reports/ Completion only by AusAID and DIKTI scholarship holders, between 1-30 September annually (four weeks) Director of Graduate Research Enrolling Area Review

Progress Reviews Review progress informally at regular meetings Monitor progress against candidacy/ Project Plan More formal meetings 3 or 4 times per year with all supervisors Identify issues that require attention by the supervisor and student Highlight future matters of concern – research, institutional, personal and sponsorship

Changes During Candidature Thesis Committee Members Chair Supervisor Co-Supervisor Associate Supervisor Allocate percentage supervision contribution Supervisor Leave Arrangements Variation to Candidacy Details Thesis title Thesis Committee Nomination of Examiners Ethics

Develop rapport and positive student-supervisor relationship Good relationships Develop rapport and positive student-supervisor relationship Cultural sensitivity Remember – life happens Workloads Leave Personal issues

Planning: Essential for timely completion of thesis Major milestones Budgets Access to facilities Form of the thesis Conference and Publication Plan B

Student-supervisor issues When things go wrong: Lack of progress Personal issues – family, financial Difficulties with data collection Student unable to grasp “research” Student-supervisor issues Personality clash Disagreement over direction, publications Writing Plagiarism, language skills Milestones are they achieved?

International students Additional coursework Start date Plagiarism / Attribution awareness Isolation Fees/sponsorship deadlines International Sponsored Students Unit

Attribution of Published work Transparent attribution to the examiners of the thesis. Is it OK to: publish a paper with 4 co-authors and then insert the paper in the thesis as a chapter and NOT acknowledge the publication or the fact that there were other authors? have two students use the same paper in their thesis if they are both authors? Not to acknowledge that the works in the thesis have been presented elsewhere? Not to have co-authors sign off on their contribution to the co-authored papers. Authorship -- what qualified for authorship? MUST have an authorship agreement or as a minimum some formal record of the conversation and the agreement of the supervisory panel (AND student.)

International Student Tuition Fees Who pays when sponsorship ends? Important to develop candidacy that is achievable within sponsorship available Important to set research milestones and monitor progress in conjunction with sponsorship Information available from Fee Centre website and International student fees

Turnitin –once at Candidacy (#1) once at Submission.(#3) Yoda often orders sentences as Object-Subject-Verb, split verbs, switches entire phrases… “Speak like Yoda you can” Scenario 1 Plagiarism: Your student is approaching the submission of their Application for Candidacy. Their progress to date has been a little slow, but they have presented you with what seems to be a good quality proposal. As a matter of course you run the proposal past the co-supervisor for a second opinion of the quality. Your colleague’s response takes you by surprise: they recognised passages from a journal article by an overseas academic whom they have worked closely with in the past. You look into this matter further and find that a few passages in the proposal are copied word-for-word from other sources without acknowledgement. How do you proceed?

Scenario 2 Cultural expectations: You are supervising an international student. They have a good academic record from their previous studies in their home country. However, in preparing their candidacy application it becomes apparent that their previous studies have not included independent research in the way we understand it. You seem to have to give the student very close direction, and they do not take their own initiative. The work that is produced does not show the level of insight or intellectual sophistication required at the PhD level. You are aware that the student can be terminated but are reluctant to do this as the student may face social and financial implications in their home country. How might you approach this?

Scenario 3 IP/Data: You are supervising a PhD student who has a scholarship as part of a project funded by industry. The student has always been abrasive but has made good progress. Eventually your personal differences become insurmountable - two years into the PhD the student decides to change supervisors. However, the student does not have enough time left to change the focus of the project. They intend to keep the same research topic and use the data they have already collected under your direction. The data is related to your grant and was collected under funding provided by industry for your project. Can the student do this? How do you proceed? What about publications?

Scenario 4 Student personal issues: RNA Respect Now Always You are two and half years into the supervision of a PhD student. They have made good progress. You usually see them every two weeks but after the Christmas holiday period you have not been able to arrange another meeting. The student does not respond to emails or answer phone calls. Eventually the student shows up unexpectedly and they appear to be acting a little strangely. Their attitude becomes negative and their behaviour seems erratic. The situation deteriorates to the point that you are convinced there is a mental health issue with the student, but you are not sure how to approach this, or if it is your place to do so. However, if the situation does not improve you do not see yourself being able to continue to work with the student, let alone see them to completion. How do you proceed?

Approaches to issues Where should you go for advice in the first instance? Do you know where to find the Rules and regulations regarding HDR enrolments? What resources are available to you and the student? Who can you ask for advice on the Rules in regards to HDR students?

Grievance Procedures When things go wrong: Principle – issues are resolved at lowest level possible Student ↔ Supervisor Student ↔ Chair Thesis Committee Student ↔ Director of Graduate Research (Head of Enrolling Area) Student ↔ PVC Student ↔ Dean Graduate Research School. Associate DVC, Research Excellence Complaints - supervision-related complaints dealt with via Complaints Policy and Complaints Procedure

Dealing with Plagiarism Plagiarism Policy on policy website Misconduct – Statute 10 Student Discipline Report to HoEA Ensure student is aware of plagiarism and how to avoid it Compulsory Research Integrity Training HDR Turnitin channel on Blackboard

Reviewing Student Status Formal Review Boards after APR Can change student status at any time (via your Director of Graduate Research)

Review of Academic Status Good Standing: candidates making satisfactory progress and likely to complete the research program Conditional: candidates whose progress raises concerns as to their ability to complete the research program or fail to meet a milestone. Terminated: candidates whose progress is unsatisfactory and who are unable to complete the research program Absent Without Leave (AWOL): (“Conditional on steroids”) candidates who have not submitted an APR by the due date and have not applied to the FGSC for Leave of Absence Other alternatives: withdrawal, leave of absence GRS can place a students on Conditional after they go past their time (FEC). The Supervisors can put a student on Conditional at any time… but they must go through a process to do this to allow for a plan to be made to bring the student back to Good Standing.

When to go on Conditional Milestones are more than one month overdue Student is overtime (milestone #3 – 45 months): candidate has exceeded 2 years FTE for Masters/4 years FTE for Doctoral. Candidate placed on Conditional usually allowed a further 6 months full time equivalent before formal extension requests required. Candidacy and other Milestones are not successful. Failure to meet significant research milestones AWOL: candidates who do not submit an APR or ISSR Conditional The student will be informed, in writing, of the change of academic status and advised of the conditions imposed by the Area. S - specific, significant…. M - measurable, meaningful, motivational…. A - agreed upon, attainable, achievable, acceptable, action-oriented….. R - realistic, relevant, reasonable, rewarding, results-oriented…. T - time-based, time-bound, timely, tangible, trackable….

Actions on Conditional Discuss change of status with Thesis Committee Discuss change of status with student Determine measurable conditions SMART Inform student of what attainment of conditions will achieve – good standing or further conditional tasks Inform student of what failure to attain conditions will mean – cancellation of scholarship, termination etc Formally advise student of change of status in writing Copy change of status advice to Chair of Thesis Committee and GSO

Moving to termination Discuss change of status with student Student formally advised by enrolling area/GSO of recommendation to terminate – student has 28 days to show cause Show cause accepted, termination ceases Show cause not accepted, termination proceeds No response, termination proceeds Termination proceeds, student formally advised of recommendation to terminate forwarded by FGSC to UGSC

Actions at Termination (cont’d) Termination not approved by UGSC – FGSC resolves Termination approved by UGSC, student formally advised of termination – student has 28 days to appeal process Appeal received, appeal process No response, termination is finalised Appeal proceeds, ends with decision by Provost and student notified of final outcome

Reasons for Termination (Rule 10 & 11)# The enrolment of a candidate may be terminated by the University Graduate Studies Committee, upon the recommendation of the Faculty Graduate Studies Committee, in any of the following circumstances: where the candidate has failed to submit a thesis within prescribed time limits, including extensions of enrolment as approved by the UGSC (see Section 4(c)(ii)); where the candidate has failed to submit an application for Candidacy within prescribed time limits, including extensions of time as approved by the FGSC (see Section 6(c));

Reasons for Termination (cont’d) where the progress of the candidate is deemed to be unsatisfactory by the Head of Enrolling Area or appropriate alternative (see Section 9(c)); where the candidate is Absent Without Leave for a period exceeding six months (see Section 10(b)); where the candidate has failed to otherwise comply with these Rules. # Subject to changes.. Milestones #1, #2 and #3. – new Rules / Policies.

After Termination If a student is not satisfied with the result or conduct of the University’s internal complaint handling and appeals process, they have the right to lodge a further appeal with the Western Australia Ombudsman. The Ombudsman will normally only consider whether the University has followed its own policies and procedures and whether the handling of the case has been fair and reasonable. The Ombudsman does not make a new decision, however, as a result of an investigation the Ombudsman may recommend that the University reconsider the student’s case.

After Termination (cont’d) If a student does not accept that termination of enrolment has occurred a standard response is preferred. For example, in response to email/s: Dear XXX, Thank you for your email. Your enrolment at Curtin was terminated on 8 March 2014. The internal avenues of appeal have been exhausted and I regard this matter as closed. If you feel that we have not followed the appropriate process in terminating your enrolment, please contact the WA Ombudsman via http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/. Kind regards, XXX.

Extensions of Time Formal extensions of time Candidacy – if necessary submit extension form prior to candidacy due date Thesis – if necessary submit extension form prior to Expected Work Submission Date (EWS) date - 6 Months of overtime. Detail explicit conditions to be met. Amendment and/or Re-submission of Thesis – beyond 12 months

Conflict Resolution Rules: Section 15, Grievance Procedures, of Rule 10: Degree of Doctor by Research, or Rule 11: Degree of Master by Research Policies: Complaints Procedures http://policies.curtin.edu.au/findapolicy/#c

Conflict Resolution (cont’d) Contacts: Conflict Resolution - Manager, Conflict Resolution & Equity; or contact the Integrity and Standards Unit complaints@curtin.edu.au 9266 9184 Postgraduate Students Association psc.president@guild.curtin.edu.au 9266 4911 Student Assist Officers within the Curtin Student Guild reception@guild.curtin.edu.au 9266 2900

Third Party Agreements Intellectual Property – As a general rule the University does not claim ownership of Intellectual Property created by Students independently (sections 4.1 and 4.3 of the Intellectual Property Policy) Contracts – governs relationship with third parties e.g. IP and publications Copyright – As a general rule students retain copyright on their thesis unless they agree otherwise in writing (section 4.2 of the Ownership of Intellectual Property Policy) Confidentiality – University and third party

Student Sponsorship Includes students sponsored by overseas agencies, industry, Commonwealth government, enrolling areas Student sponsorship by overseas agencies is managed through the International Sponsored Students Unit (ISSU) - International Office Sponsorship with an external provider who pays tuition fees and/or stipend, etc. as negotiated in the agreement Issues Failure to meet scholarship conditions Failure to make adequate progress in research Expiry of scholarship – fees and living expenses Students on LoA, AWOL – advise Scholarships Office

Student Sponsorship (cont’d) Information for sponsored students available via the International Office website: http://international.curtin.edu.au/sponsorships/ Information about Sponsorship available via the Fees Centre website: http://fees.curtin.edu.au/sponsorship.cfm

Supervision – resources Staff portal – Research – HDR Supervision - HDR Supervision at Curtin ) includes links to: Supervision of HDR Students Policy and Procedures Guidelines for Establishing the Higher Degree by Research Supervisory Relationship Guidelines for the Assignment of Conditional Status Supervisor Registration and Renewal Academic Integrity, plagiarism and complaints Collaborative PhD research HDR Supervisor Training includes links to: Supervisor Induction, and Notes & iLectures Current Students – Managing your higher degree by research see next slide Cont’d over…

Managing Your HDR by research

Milestones Website

Curtin Support/Resources for students Supervisor team, thesis chair School Director of Graduate Research Graduate Research School Staff Faculty Librarians & Library Research support University Counselling and Health Services Research Standards (Ethics and Hazardous Materials) Research ethics and safety (includes link to HIT) Health, Safety and Emergency Management Curtin Institute for Computation Student Guild and PG Students Committee Student Assist

Questions?