Characterization and optimization of the device.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstrations I, II, and III.
Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
Robot surface tension experiments.
TPAD training protocol.
Fabrication of bilayer actuator composed of a hygroscopically active layer with aligned nanofibers and an inactive layer. Fabrication of bilayer actuator.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Multilayered e-dermis design and characterization.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.
Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Prosthesis grasping and control.
Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.
A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
Fig. 2 Global production, use, and fate of polymer resins, synthetic fibers, and additives (1950 to 2015; in million metric tons). Global production, use,
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Experimental results for tremor reduction.
Prosthesis system diagram.
Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.
A summary of different energy sources for robotics.
Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.
Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.
Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Fluorescence response of actuator.
Characteristics of the topology-optimized actuator and long-term tests
The two modalities for the multitask condition.
Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.
RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.
Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.
Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.
Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.
Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.
Fig. 1 Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing sectors, 2009–2014. Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing.
Fig. 2 Magnetic properties of FGT/Pt bilayer.
Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo.
Discrimination accuracy across conditions.
Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.
Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.
The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.
Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.
Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.
Fig. 2 Longitudinal (local) resistance Rxx and nonlocal resistance Rnl with different terminal configurations on the six-terminal device measured without.
Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.
Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.
Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.
Presentation transcript:

Characterization and optimization of the device. Characterization and optimization of the device. (A) GMI ratio responses of the inductive sensing element to the magnetic field at different exciting frequencies. (B) Experimental impedance responses of the inductive sensing element to height changes. M is the remanent magnetization of the polymer magnet. Height is between the polymer magnet and the inductive sensing element. (C) The GMI ratio responses of the sensor to the displacements at different frequencies, that is, 75, 250, 750, and 1000 kHz. Displacement is the deformation of the polymer magnet under different loadings. (D) Relation of the factor of sensitivity κ of the inductive sensing element and frequency of driving current. Yuanzhao Wu et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat0429 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works