The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Gripper that grasps autonomously.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception) prosthesis sensing and discrimination in an amputee. Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception)

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Signal flow within the system.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

A summary of different energy sources for robotics.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Schematic signal pathway.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Fig. 1 From conventional cuff-based blood pressure measurement to cuff-less BP monitoring using a smartphone. From conventional cuff-based blood pressure.

Actuating properties of Vis light–induced actuation.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Fig. 5 Schematic phase diagrams of Ising spin systems and Mott transition systems. Schematic phase diagrams of Ising spin systems and Mott transition systems.

Examples of organic sensing in robotics.

Fig. 1 Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing sectors, 2009–2014. Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

Fig. 4 Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal phyla across France. Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Robot-assisted intervention system.

Robot-initiated joint attention.

Recorded spatial distribution of swift parrots.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability. The biomimetic pressure sensing ability. (A) Schematic diagram showing the circuit that converts analog signals recorded from the sensor into digital-frequency signals. (B) The digital-frequency response of the device changed with applied pressure, a pressure range experienced by humans in their daily lives. (C) The digital frequency as a function of applied pressure in the range of 0 to ~1 kPa. (D) The digital frequency as a function of applied pressure in the range of 0 to ~7.5 Pa. Yuanzhao Wu et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat0429 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works