OWASP Application Security Verification Standard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Approaches to meeting the PCI Vulnerability Management and Penetration Testing Requirements Clay Keller.
Advertisements

OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 2009
Ossi Taipale, Lappeenranta University of Technology
PKE PP Mike Henry Jean Petty Entrust CygnaCom Santosh Chokhani.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
WebGoat & WebScarab “What is computer security for $1000 Alex?”
Achieving (and Maintaining) Compliance With Secure Software Development Compliance Requirements (ISC)² SecureSDLC May 17, 2012.
Learning Objectives Explain similarities and differences among algorithms, programs, and heuristic solutions List the five essential properties of an algorithm.
Tools and Services for the Long Term Preservation and Access of Digital Archives Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Sangchul Song Institute for Advanced Computer.
Leveraging User Interactions for In-Depth Testing of Web Applications Sean McAllister, Engin Kirda, and Christopher Kruegel RAID ’08 1 Seoyeon Kang November.
The OWASP Foundation Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under.
Testing Processes of Web Applications Susan Cohen.
By: Razieh Rezaei Saleh.  Security Evaluation The examination of a system to determine its degree of compliance with a stated security model, security.
A Framework for Automated Web Application Security Evaluation
Computer Security and Penetration Testing
Copyright 2007 © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Testing Basics of Testing Presented by: Vijay.C.G – Glister Tech.

Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike.
Requirements and Estimation Process From a CMM Level 5 Organization Alan Prosser.
Introducing the Common App Online For First-Year Admission Last updated:
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
October 3, 2008IMI Security Symposium Application Security through a Hacker’s Eyes James Walden Northern Kentucky University
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Getting Started with OWASP The Top 10, ASVS, and the Guides Dave Wichers COO, Aspect Security OWASP Board Member OWASP Top 10 and ASVS Projects Lead.
NAS101, Appendex A, Page 1 DOCUMENTATION This section briefly describes the MSC.Nastran documentation. A quick overview of these documents is shown in.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation This work is available under the Creative Commons SA 2.5 license The OWASP Foundation OWASP Denver February 2012.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
OWASP ASVS Levels1234 Tools Manual Test and Review Manual Design Review At higher levels in ASVS,the use of tools is encouraged. But to be effective,the.
ASHRAY PATEL Protection Mechanisms. Roadmap Access Control Four access control processes Managing access control Firewalls Scanning and Analysis tools.
Testing throughout Lifecycle Ljudmilla Karu. Verification and validation (V&V) Verification is defined as the process of evaluating a system or component.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
SOFTWARE TESTING Date: 29-Dec-2016 By: Ram Karthick.
OWASP Static Analysis (SA) Track Goals, Objectives, and Track Roadmap
SOFTWARE TESTING OVERVIEW
AIM/education directory (Ed dir)
Secure Software Confidentiality Integrity Data Security Authentication
Finding and Fighting the Causes of Insecure Applications
^ About the.
A Security Review Process for Existing Software Applications
HCI in the software process
The design process Software engineering and the design process for interactive systems Standards and guidelines as design rules Usability engineering.
The design process Software engineering and the design process for interactive systems Standards and guidelines as design rules Usability engineering.
Introduction to Software Testing
Lecture 09:Software Testing
OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 2009
Tour of OWASP’s projects
Preparing for the GDPR - What do we need to do if we process children’s personal data? Data Protection Practitioners’ Conference 2018 #DPPC2018.
2-1-1 Automated Verifications
HCI in the software process
CVE.
Software Verification and Validation
Software Verification and Validation
Finding and Fighting the Causes of Insecure Applications
HCI in the software process
OWASP Application Security Verification Standard
Final Design Authorization
HHS Child Welfare National IT Managers' Meeting
Software Verification and Validation
ESAPI Design Patterns November 2009 Mike Boberski Booz Allen Hamilton
Software Testing Strategies
OWASP Application Security Verification Standard
Presentation transcript:

OWASP Application Security Verification Standard – Web Application Edition Mike Boberski (Booz Allen Hamilton) boberski_michael@bah.com Jeff Williams (Aspect Security) jeff.williams@aspectsecurity.com Dave Wichers (Aspect Security) dave.wichers@aspectsecurity.com 12/08

The Challenges… There is a huge range in the coverage and level of rigor available in the application security verification market! Consumers have no way to tell the difference between someone just running a grep tool, and someone doing painstaking code review and manual testing.

The Philosophy of ASVS Any standard that provides a basis for the verification of web applications should be application-independent. Any such standard should be life-cycle model independent. Any such standard should define requirements that can be applied across applications without special interpretation.

The Design of ASVS The standard should define levels of application security verification. The difference in coverage and level of rigor between levels should be relatively linear. The standard should define functional verification requirements that take a white-list (i.e. positive) approach.

An Overview of ASVS “Verification Levels” section “Detailed Verification Requirements” section “Verification Reporting Requirements” section

What questions does ASVS answer? How do I know how much trust can be placed in a web application or web service? How do I know what features to build into security controls used by a web application or web service? How do I acquire a web application or web service that is verified to have a certain range in coverage and level of rigor? ? ?

How is the ASVS intended to be used? It can be used to provide a yardstick with which to assess the degree of trust that can be placed in their web applications and services, It can be used to provide guidance to security control developers as to what to build into their commercial products in order to satisfy web application and service security requirements, and It can be used to provide a basis for specifying web application and web service security requirements in contracts.   

What is the status of the ASVS as an OWASP standard? The Web Application Edition of ASVS is the first OWASP standard. Its current official release version is Beta. A Web Service Edition of ASVS is under development and not yet available for release. Future Editions of ASVS are planned both for additional languages (it is currently available in English) and for future technologies (perhaps for example, a Cloud Computing Edition)

Project Plan and Status 12/8/2008 - OWASP ASVS Final assistance required! Please join the mailing list for more information and assignments. 12/5/2008 - OWASP ASVS exits the Summer of Code 2008! The Beta draft of the Web Application Edition is released! Mike Boberski, Jeff Williams, and Dave Wichers are the primary authors. 10/3/2008 - OWASP ASVS Alpha draft is released! Mike Boberski is the primary author. 4/16/2008 - OWASP ASVS Summer of Code 2008 proposal submitted by Mike Boberski wins!

Details: What are ASVS verification levels?

Earning a level…

Level 1 – Automated Verification Level Definitions Level 1 – Automated Verification Level 1A – Dynamic Scan (Partial Automated Verification) Level 1B – Source Code Scan (Partial Automated Verification) Level 2 – Manual Verification Level 2A – Penetration Test (Partial Manual Verification) Level 2B – Code Review (Partial Manual Verification) Level 3 – Design Verification Level 4 – Internal Verification

Breadth – Number of Requirements Coverage Depth – Level of Rigor No malicious developers The design has to be right The controls have to be right Scan  Breadth – Number of Requirements   

Level 1 in more detail Automated verification of a web application treated as groups of components within single monolithic entity.

Application Security Verification Techniques Find Vulnerabilities Using the Running Application Find Vulnerabilities Using the Source Code Manual Application Penetration Testing Manual Security Code Review Automated Application Vulnerability Scanning Automated Static Code Analysis

Tools – At Best 45% MITRE found that all application security tool vendors’ claims put together cover only 45% of the known vulnerability types (695) They found very little overlap between tools, so to get 45% you need them all (assuming their claims are true)

Level 2 in more detail Manual verification of a web application organized into a high-level architecture.

Manual Penetration Test Level 2B Manual Code Review Level 2 Options Level 2A Manual Penetration Test Level 2B Manual Code Review Need BOTH to achieve a full level 2 But requirements can be filled by either

Level 3 in more detail Design verification of a web application organized into a high-level architecture.

Level 4 in more detail Internal verification of a web application by searching for malicious code (not malware) and examining how security controls work.

What are ASVS verification requirements? Security architecture verification requirements Security control verification requirements  Security architecture information puts verification results into context and helps testers and reviewers to determine if the verification was accurate and complete

A positive approach Negative Positive The tester shall search for XSS holes Positive Verify that the application performs input validation and output encoding on all user input

Requirement Summary Security Area Level 1A 1B 2A 2B Level 3 Level 4 V1 – Security Architecture Verification Requirements 1 2 4 5 V2 – Authentication Verification Requirements 3 9 13 14 V3 – Session Management Verification Requirements 6 7 8 V4 – Access Control Verification Requirements 12 15 V5 – Input Validation Verification Requirements V6 – Output Encoding/Escaping Verification Requirements 10 V7 – Cryptography Verification Requirements V8 – Error Handling and Logging Verification Requirements V9 – Data Protection Verification Requirements V10 – Communication Security Verification Requirements V11 – HTTP Security Verification Requirements V12 – Security Configuration Verification Requirements V13 – Malicious Code Search Verification Requirements V14 – Internal Security Verification Requirements Totals 22 51 83 96 112

What are ASVS reporting requirements? R1 – Report Introduction R2 – Application/Service Description R3 – Application/Service Security Architecture R4 – Verification Results  Is the report sufficiently detailed to make verification repeatable? Does the report have sufficient types of information to allow a reviewer to determine if the verification was accurate and complete? 

You can download a copy from the ASVS Project page: Where do I go from here? You can download a copy from the ASVS Project page: http://www.owasp.org/index.php/ASVS You can send comments and suggestions for improvement using the project mailing list: See “Mailing List/Subscribe” link on project web page.

Where can I find help getting started using ASVS? You can find information to help you get started using ASVS in two locations: Section “Some Guidance on the Verification Process” in ASVS There are articles at the bottom of the ASVS Project Page:

Questions? ?