Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISSUES THAT PLAGUE NON- INFERIORITY TRIALS PAST AND FUTURE RALPH B. DAGOSTINO, SR. BOSTON UNIVERSITY HARVARD CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Advertisements

How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Study Size Planning for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Reporting drugs and treatments Thomas Abraham JMSC 6090.
A Flexible Two Stage Design in Active Control Non-inferiority Trials Gang Chen, Yong-Cheng Wang, and George Chi † Division of Biometrics I, CDER, FDA Qing.
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Critical Appraisal for MRCGP Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP trainer Editor GPnotebook (
BS704 Class 7 Hypothesis Testing Procedures
Sample Size Determination Ziad Taib March 7, 2014.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
Committee Questions Design, Statistical Considerations and Study Conduct 1. There are no clear guidelines regarding the number of people that should be.
Research Skills Basic understanding of P values and Confidence limits CHE Level 5 March 2014 Sian Moss.
Clinical trials and pitfalls in planning a research project Dr. D. W. Green Consultant Anaesthetist King's College Hospital Denmark Hill London SE5 9RS.
Challenges of Non-Inferiority Trial Designs R. Sridhara, Ph.D.
Consumer behavior studies1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STUDIES STATISTICAL ISSUES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr. Boston University Harvard Clinical Research Institute.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Biostatistics Class 6 Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Inference 2/29/2000.
What is a non-inferiority trial, and what particular challenges do such trials present? Andrew Nunn MRC Clinical Trials Unit 20th February 2012.
Medical Statistics as a science
Fall 2002Biostat Statistical Inference - Proportions One sample Confidence intervals Hypothesis tests Two Sample Confidence intervals Hypothesis.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
Hypothesis Testing Introduction to Statistics Chapter 8 Feb 24-26, 2009 Classes #12-13.
Relative Risk Therapy A Better Therapy B Better COMPASS 95% CI no worse than 1.5 TARGET 95% CI no worse than 1.47 ASSENT-2.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The Purpose and Fundamentals of Statistics in Clinical Trials.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Double-blind, randomized trial in 4,162 patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Methods and Statistical analysis. A brief presentation. Markos Kashiouris, M.D.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble
20. Comparing two proportions
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Sample Size Determination
The Importance of Adequately Powered Studies
Francis KL Chan Department of Medicine & Therapeutics CUHK
How many study subjects are required ? (Estimation of Sample size) By Dr.Shaik Shaffi Ahamed Associate Professor Dept. of Family & Community Medicine.
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
Confidence Intervals and p-values
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Chapter 8: Inference for Proportions
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
NAPLEX preparation: Biostatistics
When we free ourselves of desire,
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Aiying Chen, Scott Patterson, Fabrice Bailleux and Ehab Bassily
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Heart failure.
P2Y12 blockade versus placebo; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Statistical significance using p-value
A decade after the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: Weaving firm clinical recommendations from lessons learned  Robert E.
Volume 382, Issue 9894, Pages (August 2013)
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
Type I and Type II Errors
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
The benefit of evolocumab treatment is consistent regardless of inflammation level HR %CI ARR 1.6% 1.8%
Björn Bornkamp, Georgina Bermann
Basic statistics.
Introduction To Hypothesis Testing
Presentation transcript:

Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019

Short Answer Questions You have been asked to work with a statistician to determine the sample size for a phase III parallel group superiority trial in heart failure patients of a new drug “X” versus placebo. The primary endpoint will be all cause mortality after one year of treatment Apart from a type I error (statistical significance level), list 3 other critical direct assumptions/pieces of information you will need to tell your statistician so a sample size can be calculated for this study design (3 marks) 22/09/2019

Q1, 2013 (continued) Complete the table below to show what change in the 3 assumptions you have listed in the question part a) would result in a smaller sample size (1½) If the primary endpoint was changed to a composite of all cause mortality plus cardiovascular morbidity after one year, what would be the expected impact on sample size? (½) Assumption from part a) Change in assumption to achieve a smaller sample size Type I error (e.g. p<0.01) Increase (e.g. p<0.05) 22/09/2019

Q1, 2013 (continued) In another phase III trial, a biomarker (raised protein level ) was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity in predicting hospitalisations for heart failure. The results showed this biomarker to have 70% sensitivity but 95% specificity to hospitalisations for heart failure Briefly explain what is meant by a “70% sensitivity and 95% specificity for heart failure hospitalisation” (2) How could this biomarker be used in future trials? (3) 22/09/2019

Q6, 2014 Define Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) (1) Define Relative Risk (RR), also known as a risk ratio (1) What is a hazard ratio and when is it used in preference to a RR? (2) In the context of a comparison between two treatments explain the term ‘null value’ What would be the null value be for an RR? What would be the null value be for an ARR? (3) 22/09/2019

Q6, 2014 (continued) If the point estimate for a RR of drug X versus placebo for all-cause mortality was 0.5 (in favour of drug X), briefly explain, giving an example for each, what the 95% CI values for the RR could be when the p value for the result was: Highly statistically significant Not statistically significant (3) For the above scenario comparing drug X with placebo, give an example of a point estimate and the 95% CI if the RR result was now statistically significant in favour of placebo (1) 22/09/2019

Accept Null Hypothesis Reject Null Hypothesis Q9, 2015 Regarding Statistical Error In the context of testing drug A on mortality in a placebo controlled study, give the “null hypothesis” (1) In the table below, there are cells labelled W, X, Y, Z. If you could replace these letters using just one of the three terms “Correct decision”, “Type I error” or “Type II error” indicate what term should be given to each letter. (2) Which letter could be considered the “Regulator’s Risk” and why? (1½) Which letter could be considered the “Sponsor’s Risk” and why? (1½) Accept Null Hypothesis Reject Null Hypothesis Null Hypothesis is true W X Null Hypothesis is false Y Z 22/09/2019

Regarding Missing Data Q9, 2015 (continued) Regarding Missing Data List 2 reasons why missing data is of concern in a clinical trial (1) List 3 ways to handle missing data in an Intention to Treat analysis for continuous data (1½) List 1 way to handle missing data in an Intention to Treat analysis for binary data (e.g. dead or alive) (½) To assess the impact of missing data, what would you ask your statistician to do? (1) 22/09/2019

Briefly describe why we perform (3) Q8, 2016 Briefly describe why we perform (3) A superiority study A non-inferiority study An equivalence study What do you understand by the non-inferiority margin? (1) A non-inferiority study was performed with a new drug (X) versus a licensed reference drug (Y). The non-inferiority margin for relative risk (RR) on all-cause mortality (the primary endpoint) was 1.30. 22/09/2019

Test drug (X) is non-inferior to reference (Y) Q8, 2016 (continued) Draw a diagram to show the position of the non-inferiority margin and illustrate the position of the 95% confidence interval for the RR result for the following scenarios: (6) Test drug (X) is non-inferior to reference (Y) Test drug (X) meets the criteria for non-inferiority but the reference drug (Y) is better Test drug (X) does not meet the criteria for non-inferiority and the reference drug is better Test drug (X) is superior to reference (Y) The result is inconclusive (neither X nor Y is superior and the criteria for non-inferiority are not met) *you need only draw one diagram, but please clearly label each scenario 22/09/2019

b) What would be the null hypothesis for this trial? (1) Q5, 2018 In a phase 3 clinical trial, 1000 patients were treated for one year with a new investigational drug X, whilst another 1000 patients received placebo for a year. The event of interest for the primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). After one year, 50 patients in the Drug X group were dead or had a non-fatal MI versus 100 patients in the placebo group. a) Briefly describe 2 key safeguards which should make a placebo control arm ethically acceptable in this trial (2) b) What would be the null hypothesis for this trial? (1) 22/09/2019

Q5, 2018 (cont.) c) What do you understand by a type 1 and a type 2 error and give a typical value you would expect the statistician to assume for the type 2 error in this trial? (3) d) Show how you would calculate the relative risk reduction (RRR) for drug X on death and non-fatal MI in this trial using the information given. Note: you do not need to calculate the actual value, full marks will be awarded by showing the method (2) e) The absolute risk reduction (ARR) in this trial was 5%. Calculate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and explain what the NNT means in the context of this trial (2) 22/09/2019

Q8, 2017 a) What do you understand by an event driven (tine to event) study? (2) b) With respect to the assumptions made for the event rate, list 2 important trial logistics that must be in place for a time to an event trial (2) c) If during the trial the event rate is lower than expected, briefly describe 4 different options available to youto ensure the trial can be completed (4) d) For 2 of the options you have listed in c), briefly describe what you must do to implement that option 22/09/2019