Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Advertisements

Figure 1 Flowchart of our CIS cohort considering patients (A) and eyes (B) as statistical unit. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted predictors of PAC

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 3 Multivariate regression analysis to display the impact of recanalization on the formation of ischaemic brain ... Figure 3 Multivariate regression.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability

Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

RCTs: randomized controlled ...

Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Figure 1. Historical dialectic framework to assess transnational advocacy network influence Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants screened, enrolled and followed-up between 1 July 2015 and 31 May Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants.

Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Figure 1 Plot showing the interaction between Indigenous group belonging and use of family health centres Figure 1 Plot showing the interaction between.

Figure 1 Cumulative late adjusted survival in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator and pacemaker patients. ... Figure 1 Cumulative late adjusted.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Figure 1. The derivation of the cohort.

FIGURE 1 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram for the follow-up study. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

FIGURE 1 WIC exposure groups included in the study

Figure 1. Results of search based on the PRISMA statement.14

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Figure 1. Design and data processing in a study of the effectiveness of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer, Hua ... Figure 1. Design and data processing.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1. Data access using HMP16SData

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.

Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1. Flowchart detailing exclusions of fetal death and livebirth records obtained from Texas Department of State ... Figure 1. Flowchart detailing.

FIGURE 1 Weight loss for participants (n = 128) who consumed the high-egg (n = 66) or the low-egg (n = 62) diets ... FIGURE 1 Weight loss for participants.

Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms

Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 3. Key words and phrases from narrative text by classification category. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to.

Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.

Figure 1: Yearly net investment flows from Japan

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.

Figure 1. Parenting Evaluations by Parenting Style, Education, and Vignette Parent Gender. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.

Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA

Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates.

Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on Healthy Eating Index (HEI) total and component scores during pregnancy (n = 1,279), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). The coefficient for total fruit intake remained statistically significant at P < 0.05 when using Dubey/Armitage-Parmar adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing. CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz098 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 2. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on nutrient density during pregnancy (n = 1,279), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz098 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 3. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on Healthy Eating Index (HEI) total score and components at 1 month postpartum (n = 1,177), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz098 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 4. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on nutrient density at 1 month postpartum, in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz098 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.