THE EU PLANT VARIETY SYSTEM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Advertisements

European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
What are the variety plants ? Fruits, trees, vines, plants, ornemental plants… Protection by Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
September 23, 2011 World Bank Annual Meetings International Law Institute CSO Forum ICSID Arbitration Paul-Jean Le Cannu Counsel - ICSID.
Udo von Kröcher 1 Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights in the Agricultural Sector in Germany Udo von Kröcher Bundessortenamt (Federal Plant Variety Office)
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
PROCUREMENT OVERSIGHT AND MONITORING – A MEANS FOR EFFECTIVE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 11 th PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE FORUM June, 9-12, 2015.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
EEMAN & PARTNERS Border Measures WIPO seminar for judges and enforcement institutions Sofia, 22 & 23 November 2012 Marius Schneider Attorney-at-law Eeman.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analyses of Enterprises INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS: PROCEDURES AND SUPERVISION Turin, 9 August 2005.
New Regulation on Plant Reproductive Material: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission, DG SANCO.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Ownership and use of DUS samples and DNA of DUS samples during and after the DUS test Kees Jan Groenewoud Secretary to the Dutch Board for Plant Varieties.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights Warsaw, Poland 11 and 12 May 2006 GENERAL BACKGROUND ON TECHNICAL ASPECT Julia Borys COBORU.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORMS IN ALBANIA 10 th PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EXCHANGE PLATFORM May, 27-30, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey 1.
Lessons learned by Community Plant Variety Office - CPVO Hans Walter Rutz Community agencies: partners in accession 25 to 27 November 2009, Lisbon.
Dace Berkolde Director State Aid Control Department Ministry of Finance Latvia 1.
Council Directive 2003/9/EC laying down standards for the reception of asylum seekers European Commission Directorate-General External Relations.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial services Bilateral screening:
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
Seed industry & IPR perspective from a regional PVP Office Carlos Godinho Vice-President CPVO APSA Workshop – Bangkok, 18/05/15.
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II Tutorials Karima Amellal.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
Conditions and procedures to obtain authorisation to access the service market Carlos AlmarazTAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Case C-174/14 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 29 October 2015
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Financial Support to Third Parties
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Chapter 3 Administrative Law Chapter 3: Administrative Law.
European Union Law Law 326.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
The Board of Appeal of the CPVO Martin EKVAD, President of the CPVO
New challenges for archives in Iceland
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Plant Biotechnology and Plant Breeder’s Rights :
UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES
First instance review in Slovenia
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
European actions.
Automated beef classification
The EDPS: competences and processing of personal data in EU funds
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II
Jill Michielssen European Commission, DG Environment
International Training Centre of the ILO
Position of the Board of Appeal in the legal protection system for Community plant variety rights Gert Würtenberger.
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
STATE AID - Week 9 - Prof. Valerio Cosimo Romano.
TRIPS Art. 27.3(b) and Agriculture
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
Presentation transcript:

THE EU PLANT VARIETY SYSTEM Francesco MATTINA, Vice-President Community Plant Variety Office SEMINAR ON THE BENEFITS OF PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION 20 September 2018 – Sofia, Bulgaria

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System 1. Historical Background 2. Coexistence of the CPVR system 3. Legal Basis Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Historial Background Sui generis system for the industrial property protection of plant varieties (Art. 1 BR) The intellectual property rights granted under this system are valid throughout the territory of the 28 Member States of the EU, encompassing over 450 million consumers This system was established by a Council Regulation in 1994, which is modelled on the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants of 1991 (1991 UPOV Act) l The EU became party to UPOV as inter-governmental organisation in 2005 ñ Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Coexistence of the CPVR system The CPVR-system co-exists with the national systems Applicant’s choice: National* OR EU route (Art. 3 BR) * 24 EU Member States are members to UPOV and have their own Plant Variety Rights’ system (all EU MS with the exception of Cyprus, Greece, Malta and Luxembourg) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights Legal Basis Basic Regulation (BR): Implementing Regulations (IRS): 3 Commission Regulations relating to: Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights Regulation No. 874/2009 Proceedings before the CPVO Regulation No. 1238/95 Fees payable to the CPVO Regulation No. 1768/95 The agricultural exemption Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Protection IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

II. The CPVO 1. Description 2. Mission Statement 3. Institutional Framework 4. Organisational Chart 5. Administrative Council 6. Funding Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Description The EU Plant Variety system is run by the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO): Official Agency of the EU Based in Angers (France) Operational since 1995 Independent legal status Fully self-financed President and Vice-President (appointed by the Council) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Mission statement ‘To deliver and promote an efficient Intellectual Property Rights system that supports the creation of new plant varieties for the benefit of Society’. Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Institutional Framework Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Organisational Chart Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Administrative Council The Administrative Council (AC) is made up of representatives of the EU Member States, a representative of the European Commission and Observers The Administrative Council is responsible for: Monitoring the CPVO Approval of the Budget Approval of the Technical Protocols Entrustment of Examination Offices Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Funding Under the terms of the basic Regulation the CPVO is self-financing: It must administer the system without financial support from the general European Union budget The CPVO receives revenue from fees Due to the number of applications received and rights granted, the Office has been able to meet the requirement of financial self-sufficiency Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

III. Community Plant Variety Rights 1. Object of protection 2. Uniform effect 3. Duration 4. Scope of the rights 5. Exceptions to the protection Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Object of protection Varieties of all botanical genera and species may be protected, including, inter alia, hybrids between genera or species [Art. 5(1) BR]. The Office has received applications for more than 1900 species. What is a variety? ‘A plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank’ [Art. 5(2) BR] Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Uniform Effect of the Protection Community plant variety rights (CPVRs) shall have uniform effect within the EU territory and may only be granted, transferred or terminated within such territory on a uniform basis (Art. 2 BR) Duration of the Protection The duration of the protection of plant varieties is of (Art. 19 BR): Provisional Protection: it covers the period between publication of the application for a CPVR and the grant thereof (Art. 95 BR) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Scope of the Rights (Acts) The holder is entitled to carry out the following acts: For the abovementioned acts, the authorisation of the holder is required [Art. 13(2) BR]: The holder may establish conditions and limitations typically through contract a) Production or reproduction (multiplication) b) Conditioning for the purpose of propagation c) Offering for sale d) Selling or other marketing e) & f) Exporting from/Importing to the European Union g) Stocking for any of the above mentioned purposes Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Scope of the Rights (Material) The material scope of CPVRS includes [Art. 13(2) BR]: Also referred to as Propagating material Entire plants or part of plants (capable of producing entire plants) E.g.: grafts, cuttings, bulbs, layers, rhizomes, seeds Refers to all products of the harvest E.g.: fruit, vegetables, mushrooms, flowers, cereals, fodder, fibres Variety constituents Harvested material Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Exceptions to the protection The main exceptions to CPVRS – restricting the breeder’s scope of rights – are: , The limitations of the effects of CPVRS as listed in Art. 15 BR: Acts done privately for non-commercial purposes Acts done for experimental purposes Acts done for the purpose of breeding, or discovering and developing new varieties (the breeder’s exemption) The agricultural exemption (Farm-saved seed) (Art. 14 BR): Covering varieties belonging to a limited list of 21 agricultural crops in well-defined circumstances and classified into four categories: a) Fodder plants b) Cereals c) Potatoes d) Oil and fibre plants Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

IV. Application Procedure 1. Filing of the application 2. Examination of the application: Formal, Substantive and Technical Examination 3. CPVR Grant Requirements 4. Technical Examinations 5. Grant of the CPVR 6. Fees Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Filing of the application The system is open to any natural or legal person (Art. 12 BR) Applicants outside the EU must appoint a procedural representative (Art. 82 BR) If the applicant is not the breeder of the variety, a deed of assignment must be enclosed attesting to the transfer of rights (Art. 11 BR) The CPVR application shall be filed (Art. 49 BR): The application date is the date on which a valid application was received (Art. 51 BR) - at the CPVO directly; OR - at one of the sub-offices or national agencies, established or entrusted Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Examination of the application (I) Examinations carried out by the CPVO: Formal examination Substantive examination: Entitlement, Novelty, Variety Denomination Examinations carried out by Examination Offices: Technical examination: DUS Testing Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Examination of the application (II) Formal Examination [Article 53(1) BR]The Office examines whether: The application has effectively been filed (as per Art. 49 BR) The application complies with the conditions laid down in Art. 50 BR (e.g.: request for the grant) The fees have been paid within the due time limit (as per Art. 83 BR) Substantive Examination [Article 54(1) BR]The Office examines whether: The variety can be defined as such pursuant Art. 5 BR The variety is new (Art. 10 BR) The applicant is entitled to file an application (Art. 12 BR) & to the CPVR (Art. 11 BR) The proposed Variety Denomination is suitable (Art. 63 BR) Technical Examination [Article 55(1) BR] Whether the variety is Distinct, Uniform & Stable Filing of the application Formal, Substantive & Technical Examination Decision of grant or refusal Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

CPVR Grant Requirements The Plant Variety must comply with the following requirements (Art. 6 BR): THE DUS CRITERIA D – Distinctivity U – Uniformity S – Stability NOVELTY VARIETY DENOMINATION Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

DUS Criteria The candidate variety should be: Distinct from already existing varieties of common knowledge at the time of the application filing (Art. 7 BR) Uniform in the expression of its relevant characteristics (Art. 8 BR) Stable in its characteristics, that should remain unchanged after repeated propagation (Art. 9 BR) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Novelty The candidate variety must not have been sold/disposed of to others by or with the breeder’s consent within the EU for purposes of exploitation of the variety [Art. 10(1) BR]: (a) earlier than 1 year before the application date, within the EU (b) earlier than 4 years or, in the case of trees or of vines, earlier than 6 years before the application date, outside the EU Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Variety Denomination The applicant proposes the Variety Denomination [Art. 50(3) BR] If suitable, the Office approves it [Art. 54(1) BR] A variety is considered suitable if there are no impediments (Art. 63 BR) Variety Denominations must not be confused with Trade marks! Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Technical Examinations The CPVO has not created its own technical infrastructure Technical examinations are carried out by the Examination Offices (EOs) entrusted by the Administrative Council The attribution of varieties for DUS testing to EOS is done according to defined criteria: Wish of the breeder (usual criteria) Origin of the applicant Geographical origin of the variety Experience of the EO Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Virtual Training Center Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Technical Protocols Technical examinations are generally carried out according to the CPVO technical protocols [Art. 56(2) BR] In default of these, UPOV guidelines shall serve as reference [Art. 22(3) PR] The CPVO technical protocols contain a compulsory list of characteristics to be met by the varieties The CPVO protocols are: Based on the relevant UPOV guidelines Elaborated together with national crop experts Formally adopted by the CPVO’s Administrative Council Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Technical reports Technical report: Issued after the technical examination It can be positive or negative If positive, it will include a description of the variety The applicant has 2 months to send its comments on the report Take-over of technical reports: if a technical examination is carried out by an entrusted EO on a variety benefiting from national PVRs or entered for EU national listing, the CPVO may consider their report as basis for a decision Exchange of technical reports: the CPVO can submit reports to any other authority on request Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Grant of the CPVR If the Office considers that the examination findings are sufficient and there are no impediments, it shall grant the CPVR and the decision shall include an official description of the variety (Art. 62 BR) If a CPVR requirement is not fulfilled, the application is rejected (Art. 61 BR) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Fees Application fee: paper – 650 EUR online – 450 EUR Examination fee: 1430 - 3210 EUR per year/cycle of DUS test Take over fee: 320 EUR Annual fee: 330 EUR Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals 1. Objection 2. Nullity 3. Cancellation 4. Appeals Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Objection Any person may lodge with the CPVO a written objection to the grant of a CPVR (Art. 59 BR) Objectors shall be party to the CPVR grant proceedings Objections may be based only on the grounds of: Conditions laid down in Articles 7 to 11 BR The objection may be lodged at any time after the application and prior to a grant/refusal decision An impediment to a proposed variety denomination The objection shall be lodged within 3 months of the publication of the proposed variety denomination Decisions on objections are taken by the ad hoc Committee of 3 members Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Nullity Nullity actions may be initiated by the Office on its own motion or upon request (Art. 53a PR) The Office shall declare the CPVR null and void if (Art. 20 BR): the conditions laid down in Articles 7 (distinctness) or 10 BR (novelty) were not complied with at the time of the CPVR the conditions laid down in Articles 8 (uniformity) and 9 BR (stability) were not complied with at the time of grant the right has been granted to a person who is not entitled to it If the nullity action succeeds, the CPVR shall be deemed not to have had effects as from the outset (ex tunc) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Cancellation Cancellation actions may be initiated by the Office on its own motion or upon request (Art. 53a PR) The Office shall cancel the CPVR if the variety is no longer uniform or stable [Art. 21(1) BR] The Office may also cancel the CPVR if the holder [Art. 21(2) BR]: does not provide the information to verify that the variety remains ‘unaltered’ does not propose a suitable variety denomination fails to pay fees to maintain the CPVR in force no longer satisfies the conditions of entitlement The effects of a cancellation are ‘in futurum’ (ex nunc) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Appeals The Board of Appeal is a quasi-judicial body responsible for deciding on appeals Any natural or legal person may appeal against a decision addressed to that person or against a decision of direct and individual concern (Art. 68 BR) The appeal must be lodged within 2 months (and the grounds of appeal within 4 months) from the date of publication of the concerned decision (Art. 69 BR) An appeal fee of 1500 EUR needs to be paid The appeal has a suspensory effect on the contested decision [Art. 67(2) BR] Interlocutory revision: the CPVO body which prepared the decision may rectify it (Art. 70 BR) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Decisions subject to appeal Nullity / cancellation of a CPVR (Arts. 20 and 21 BR) Compulsory exploitation rights (Arts. 29 and 100 BR) Objections to the grant of a CPVR (Art. 59 BR) Refusal of an application/ Grant of a CPVR (Arts. 61 and 62 BR) Approval/amendment of variety denominations (Arts. 63 and 66 BR) Fees (Art. 83 BR) Apportionment of costs (Art. 85 BR) Establishment of the Registers/ Public inspection (Arts. 87 and 88 BR) Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Actions against BOA decisions Actions may be brought before the General Court against BOA Appeal decisions within 2 months from the decision (Art. 73 BR) The actions shall be based on the following grounds: Lack of competence; Infringement of an essential procedural requirement; Infringement of the Treaty, the BR or the rules relating to their application; Misuse of power. The General Court may annul or alter the contested appeal decision The General Court’s ruling may be appealed further before the Court of Justice

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Enforcement The CPVR holders can enforce their rights on the grounds of infringing acts in relation to the variety or to the variety denomination At the moment there are no specialised courts on PVRs National courts are competent to hear infringement cases The applicable national court is chosen on the basis of (Art. 101 BR): Domicile of the defendant Domicile of the plaintiff Location of the CPVO (France) Where the damaged occurred Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

Applications Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Online applications % Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Evolution of botanical taxa Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Applications EU : 1995-Present Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Applications non-EU : 1995-Present Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

All Applications : 1995-Present Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

EU Applications 2018 to date Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Non-EU Applications YTD 2018 Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

All Applications 2018 YTD

Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Grants and surrenders Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

OUTLINE I. Introduction to the European Union Plant Variety System II. The CPVO III. Community Plant Variety Rights IV. Application Procedure V. Proceedings before the Office and appeals VI. Enforcement VII. Statistics VIII. Final Remarks Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection Virtual Training Center

The daily activity of the CPVO results in: FINAL REMARKS The daily activity of the CPVO results in: Efficiencies for applicants Less administration for national authorities Close co-operation with EOs, National Authorities, breeders’ associations and EU & international bodies Formative training through the frequent organisation of seminars Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection

Seminar on the Benefits of Plant Variety Protection