Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder Current Biology

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©

Advertisements

Visual Cortex Extrastriate Body-Selective Area Activation in Congenitally Blind People “Seeing” by Using Sounds Ella Striem-Amit, Amir Amedi Current Biology.

Ancient Endo-siRNA Pathways Reveal New Tricks Julie M. Claycomb Current Biology Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages R703-R715 (August 2014) DOI: /j.cub

The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub

Signal Jamming Mediates Sexual Conflict in a Duetting Bird Joseph A. Tobias, Nathalie Seddon Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)

The Origins and Evolution of Vertebrate Metamorphosis Vincent Laudet Current Biology Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages R726-R737 (September 2011) DOI: /j.cub

Crohn's disease Prof Daniel C Baumgart, MD, Prof William J Sandborn, MD The Lancet Volume 380, Issue 9853, Pages (November 2012) DOI: /S (12)

Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)

Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear

Human sleep and cortical reactivity are influenced by lunar phase

Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby Current Biology

Eye position predicts what number you have in mind

Natalia Zaretskaya, Andreas Bartels Current Biology

Spatial Orienting Biases in the Decimal Numeral System

Pre-constancy Vision in Infants

Predatory grasshopper mice

Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces

Visual Development: Learning Not to See

Linguistic Relativity: Does Language Help or Hinder Perception?

Life History: The Energy-Efficient Orangutan

Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear

Infant cognition Current Biology

G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence Current Biology

Ryota Kanai, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Frans A.J. Verstraten Current Biology

Mental Imagery Changes Multisensory Perception

Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages R204-R206 (March 2014)

Joyce F. Benenson, Richard W. Wrangham Current Biology

Gene Regulation: The HSP70 Gene Jumps When Shocked

The Privileged Brain Representation of First Olfactory Associations

Visual Attention: Size Matters

Benjamin Thompson, Behzad Mansouri, Lisa Koski, Robert F. Hess

Face Adaptation without a Face

Road crossing in chimpanzees: A risky business

Immediate susceptibility to visual illusions after sight onset

Human colour perception changes between seasons

Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans

Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate

Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)

Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words

Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)

Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons

Daniel Hanus, Josep Call Current Biology

The sound of change: visually-induced auditory synesthesia

Visual Development: Learning Not to See

Stephen G. Lomber, Blake E. Butler Current Biology

Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish

Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring

Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality

Auditory-Visual Crossmodal Integration in Perception of Face Gender

Dongjun He, Daniel Kersten, Fang Fang Current Biology

Early Life: Embracing the RNA World

Multisensory Integration and Attention in Developmental Dyslexia

FOXO transcription factors

Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind

Silvia Convento, Md. Shoaibur Rahman, Jeffrey M. Yau Current Biology

Neuronal Plasticity: How Do Neurons Know What To Do?

Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence

Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)

Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)

Cross-Modal Associative Mnemonic Signals in Crow Endbrain Neurons

The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects

Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)

Kazumichi Matsumiya, Satoshi Shioiri Current Biology

Basal bodies Current Biology

Memory Reactivation Enables Long-Term Prevention of Interference

Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception

Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)

Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)

Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages R508-R510 (June 2014)

Presentation transcript:

Persisting Cross-Modal Changes in Sight-Recovery Individuals Modulate Visual Perception Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder Current Biology Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages 3096-3100 (November 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.069 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Auditory-Induced Visual Motion Aftereffect (A) Mean magnitude of the auditory-induced visual motion aftereffect for normally sighted, visually impaired, and cataract-reversal participants. Error bars indicate SEM. (B) Percentage of participants per group showing a significant auditory-induced visual motion aftereffect. ∗p < 0.050. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 3096-3100DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.069) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Auditory-Induced Auditory Motion Aftereffect (A) Mean magnitude of the auditory-induced auditory motion aftereffect for normally sighted, visually impaired, and cataract-reversal participants. Error bars indicate SEM. (B) Percentage of participants per group showing a significant auditory-induced auditory motion aftereffect. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 3096-3100DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.069) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Visually Induced Auditory Motion Aftereffect (A) Mean magnitude of the visually induced auditory motion aftereffect for normally sighted, visually impaired, and cataract-reversal participants. Error bars indicate SEM. (B) Percentage of participants per group showing a significant visually induced auditory motion aftereffect. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 3096-3100DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.069) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Visually Induced Visual Motion Aftereffect (A) Mean magnitude of the visually induced visual motion aftereffect for normally sighted, visually impaired, and cataract-reversal participants. Error bars indicate SEM. (B) Percentage of individuals per group showing a significant visually induced visual motion aftereffect. ∗p < 0.050. See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 3096-3100DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.069) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions