G.15 Liquid cooling adhoc IBM, Intel, HP, UL Will Susiene – Intel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Committees – the Brains of ASHRAE Section 1.0 — Fundamentals and General.
Advertisements

Quiz – An organic liquid enters a in. ID horizontal steel tube, 3.5 ft long, at a rate of 5000 lb/hr. You are given that the specific.
AWMA Meeting October 15, 2013 Stack testing issues and questions Dennis Thielen.
SC6 Ballot 1974: Adopt-back of ISO 10423:2009 as API 6A 20 th ed. Task Group Report on Resolution of Ballot Comments Eric Wehner 30 June 2010.
Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
Air Flow Bench Presented By: Saket Karajgikar & Nikhil Lakhkar Advisor: Prof. Dereje Agonafer.
Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants.
Budget Shortfall Options Ian Wyatt - Atkins JIP on Bursting Disks for Shell & Tube Exchangers – 2 nd Stakeholders Meeting.
Prepared By: Certified Compliance Solutions, Inc. August 2012
ASHRAE Technical Activities Committee (TAC) and the Technical Committees Prepared by ASHRAE’s Technical Activities Committee 2013 For further information,
Product Design and Qualification (Validation) Testing for HPHT Systems
WQA Issue Document Electrical Compliance in DWTU Standards NSF/ANSI Standards 42, 44, 55, 62, and 222.
ISA–The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society SP99 Work Group 2 TR#2 “Second Edition” Long Beach Meeting April 28, 2004.
13.4. GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: PRESSURE VESSELS
API 17 – Subsea HPHT Discussion HPHT Design Materials Design Performance Test 1 Design Methodology has been in review and development for 5+ years and.
SOLAR THERMAL AIR CONDITIONER Design Team 8. Introduction Solar Air Conditioner Introduction Design Testing Conclusion 5 April 2012 Team 8 Slide 2 of.
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards.
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Underwriters Laboratories UL Information Technology and Communications Equipment Harmonized Standards for Safety UL 1950,
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
SC8 Liaison Report 2014 Exploration & Production Standards Conference API SC8 – Subcommittee on Drilling Structures & Equipment Chair: Mark Trevithick.
PED Workshop, Bratislava April 2005 PED and Presumption of Conformity Product Standards for pressure vessels, boilers and piping, and “Horizontal” standards.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
Task Force 8: Heavy Duty Vehicles
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
Steve Griffith February 28th, 2017
The application of the PED on the design codes for cryogenic equipment and future developments foreseen in this field Paris, 06/09/2016 l Hervé BARTHELEMY.
Advisor: Dr. Shangchao Lin
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Copper Piping & High Pressure Refrigerants
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Nov 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Resolution of PAR and 5C Comments for MBAN Study.
Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
Updated Sections of the ACCL and WCCL OMs (2016)
India proposals on part B1 & B2 text
VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
Section 1.0 — Fundamentals and General
IEEE 383 Standard for Qualifying Electric Cables and Splices for Nuclear Facilities Preview SC-2 May 12, 2014 Robert Konnik.
ICE 101 REFRIGERATION BASICS
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
TF4 report (Tokyo, 2016/03/03) 1. Mechanical integrity test
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
API 14H Task Group Status Proper Classification of Document
Sept 2004 doc.: IEEE a Nov 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Use of API 6A vs ISO in marking 6A equipment
ECMA-287 Safety of Electronic Equipment Safeguards to reduce harmful exposure to energy sources Ecma TC12 Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva - T: +41.
Changes in EN
On-Line Certificate System
September 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group.
2nd Edition: 2019 Winter Standards Meeting
Sept 2004 doc.: IEEE a Nov 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Leaky Appliance Trigger Rate
Inflation Pressure Markings
based on WP29/2018/157, SLR-28-09rev1, SLR-28-12
Linear sequences A linear sequence is a list of numbers that have a common difference between each number in the list. Finding the rule that can extend.
OBD2CG OBD2 Phase 1 consolidated draft
ISO and TR Update for FDA Regulated Industries
OBD CG comments are in: this format & this format
Editorial proposal on Definitions
Updated HID Ballast Efficiency Regulations
Review of Part C Phase 2 - Inducements
MRV system budget and scheduling Short overview installation
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Working group on the rule of the 20 %
Presentation transcript:

G.15 Liquid cooling adhoc IBM, Intel, HP, UL Will Susiene – Intel Jeff Pasternak – Intel Mariel Acosta-geraldino – IBM Tom Burke – UL Glen Lesmeister – HP Extended resources -ASHRAE liaison TC9.9 Michael Patterson – Intel Retired Roger Schmidt – IBM Retired Vibration Budy Notohardjono - IBM IBM, Intel, HP, UL

G.15 Pressurized liquid filled components

Outline of changes New definitions, Self contained vs Modular 4.1.8- Removal of 1L . G.15.1 => would act as the general sub-clause that applies to all equipment with liquid cooling. Directs self contained equipment to testing criteria in 15.2 or modular equipment to 15.3. Offers evaluations to 61010 as acceptable. G.15.2 => will guide to requirements for self-contained. Editorial change in the title => Currently in 3rd edition- Not under the scope of this adhoc. G.15.2.8 Adding a subsection so there is a compliance criteria for each section. G.15.3=> New proposal that will apply to modular. G.15.3.1 Hydrostatic pressure test: Hydrostatic Pressure Limits to 1.5x or 345 kPa (50 psig) whichever is greater for use on modular LFC equipment Notice: No vibration test criteria for high end, see rationale proposal G.15.3.2 Creep Resistance Test, G.15.3.4 Tubing and fittings compatibility test, G.15.3.5 Thermal cycling test, G.15.3.6 Force test: the test requirements are the same, BUT we have added editorial changes that will allow for testing to be accepted if the testing is performed at component level vs final integration. Our intent is to be able to ask manufacturers to certify to g.15. When integrators pick up certified components, then testing would not be required at the end product. G.15.3.7 Compliance criteria for 15.3

Annex: Historical background LFC

Liquid filled heat sinks Published by Lal Bahra (Dell) on May 29, 2007 List of references used to build the standard.

(Editorial changes to include the testing below Annex V10, Nov 2007

Evolution Change in Hydrostatic pressure from 5x/3x to 3x/2x Modification suggested April 20, 2004 by Roose, 108HBSDT San Jose. Rationale Get standard IEC 62368-1 more aligned with standard IEC 61010-1 ed.3 and the European pressure directive. According to IEC 61010-1 ed. 3: The test pressure is the maximum pressure multiplied by a factor of 1,5 for testing against leakage and by factor 2,0 for testing against burst. The maximum pressure value is taking into account any single fault condition. According to the European pressure directive: For pressure vessels, the hydrostatic test pressure must be no less than corresponding to the maximum loading to which the pressure equipment may be subject in service taking into account its maximum allowable pressure and its maximum allowable temperature, multiplied by the coefficient 1,25, or the maximum allowable pressure multiplied by the coefficient 1,43, whichever is the greater.