19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Advertisements

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Duty cycle mode STA’s PS follow-up
Duty cycle mode STA’s PS follow-up
TBD clarification for TGba D0.1 (WUR Duty cycle)
Proposal on Simulation Scenario Document for 11ax PAR verification
Spec text clarification for FDMA
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
Proposal on Simulation Scenario Document for 11ax PAR verification
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
TBD clarification for TGba D0.1 (WUR Beacon)
Smart scanning for WUR discovery
WUR Frame Format for Smart Scanning
Duty cycle mode STA’s PS follow-up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Length/Misc. field in WUR frame
WUR Beacon transmission
Clarification for Variable-length WUR frame
WUR MAC issues follow-up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Length/Misc. field in WUR frame
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Duty cycle mode STA’s PS follow-up
Length field in WUR frame
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
Address field in WUR frame
WUR Discovery Period Announcement
Enhancement on resource utilization in OBSS environment
Data transmission detail in WUR mode
WUR Discovery Frame Format
Power saving operation for WUR STAs in duty cycle mode
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
Address field in WUR frame
AP re-discovery by WUR STA
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
FDMA Channel signaling
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Power saving operation for WUR STAs in duty cycle mode
Spec text clarification for FDMA
WUR Discovery Period Announcement
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
FDMA Channel signaling
WUR Frame Format for Smart Scanning
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Duty cycle mode STA’s PS follow-up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
TBD clarification for TGba D0.1 (WUR Beacon)
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
20MHz Channel Access in 11bd
Power saving operation for WUR STAs in duty cycle mode
Spec text clarification for FDMA
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
FDMA Channel signaling
Address field in WUR frame
LC MAC submission – follow up
Discussion on Multi-link Setup
LC MAC submission – follow up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Performance evaluation of deterministic service for EHT
Latency enhancement for EHT
Presentation transcript:

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2019 MAC layer design for LC Date: 2019-09-18 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Suhwook Kim LG Electronics 19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea   suhwook.kim@lge.com Jinsoo Choi js.choi@lge.com Jeongki Kim jeongki.kim@lge.com HanGyu Cho hg.cho@lge.com Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics John Doe, Some Company

Abstract We have discussed LC PHY layer in several F2F meetings September 2019 Abstract We have discussed LC PHY layer in several F2F meetings Two LC PHYs were proposed and details are described We have decided mandatory PHY So it is time to discuss and decide to MAC layer now Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 MAC issues for LC There is two big problems we have to decide before designing the LC MAC layer Channel access EDCA vs. HE MAC (OFDMA) Supporting mandatory PHY MAC operation of mandatory PHY Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Channel Access There are some options of channel access for LC MAC and we have discussed some of them Option 1: EDCA without any change Option 2: EDCA with small modification Option 3: Simplified HE MAC Option 4: HE MAC without any change Also we may adopt HCCA but it may not be a feasible solution because there is no chipset that implement it Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

EDCA MAC (Level 0, 1) If we decide to use EDCA MAC for LC, September 2019 EDCA MAC (Level 0, 1) If we decide to use EDCA MAC for LC, We can save time to market and reduce chipset price We may need small changes to support LC PHY characteristics As we have discussed, RTS/CTS would be one of options However, the latest technologies(i.e., OFDMA) are excluded in LC Performance is relatively poor than HE MAC Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

HE MAC (Level 2, 3) If we adopt HE MAC, September 2019 HE MAC (Level 2, 3) If we adopt HE MAC, We can support the new MAC features which are defined by HE MAC OFDMA, UL MU-MIMO, TWT, Spatial reuse, etc.. However, HE MAC is quite complex thus we have to review which features are suitable for LC and how LC will adopt it We have better performance and LC can be embedded in 11ax chipset But, we may need to adopt HE MAC into LC and chipset price would be expensive Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

Supporting mandatory PHY September 2019 Supporting mandatory PHY Even though we have decide to define mandatory PHY, we may need to discuss how the mandatory PHY operates in MAC layer If a STA is implemented by mandatory PHY and optional PHY, the STA has to switch operating PHY from mandatory PHY to optional PHY If there are STAs that implement mandatory PHY only and STAs that implement optional PHY in single BSS, the AP has to support both type of STAs in same time Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Mandatory PHY Management frames are define to support key functions so they shall be transmitted by mandatory PHY Probe request/response frame Authentication request/response frame (Re)Association request/response frame Beacon frame Action frame ETC… Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Mandatory PHY If all management frames are transmitted by mandatory PHY, a STA implemented by mandatory PHY and optional PHY will operate as follows Scanning, authentication and association procedure is performed in mandatory PHY After association, the STA can transmit/receive data frame by operational PHY The STA may receive beacon frame at every TBTTs by mandatory PHY Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Mandatory PHY The AP can altogether support the STA of two types at same time even though the AP cannot transmit to two PHYs at same time The AP can assign the section for the specific PHY using beacon frame Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Summary We addressed and reviewed key MAC features for designing LC MAC Channel access Supporting mandatory PHY Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

References [1] 11-19-0757-02-00bb-lc-mac-submission.pptx September 2019 References [1] 11-19-0757-02-00bb-lc-mac-submission.pptx Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

Straw poll 1 Which option do you prefer for LC MAC? Y N A September 2019 Straw poll 1 Which option do you prefer for LC MAC? Option 1: LC MAC mandates EDCA and exclude HE MAC Option 2: LC MAC mandates EDCA and support HE MAC optionally Option 3: LC MAC mandates HE MAC Note: EDCA and HE MAC can be slightly modified when applied to LC Y N A Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics

September 2019 Straw poll 2 Do you agree that all management frames shall be transmitted by mandatory PHY? Y N A Suhwook Kim et. al, LG Electronics