Characterization of Human FAST-1, a TGFβ and Activin Signal Transducer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
A TPR Motif Cofactor Contributes to p300 Activity in the p53 Response
Regulation of Wnt Signaling by Sox Proteins
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
Psoriasis Upregulated Phorbolin-1 Shares Structural but not Functional Similarity to the mRNA-Editing Protein Apobec-1  Peder Madsen, Julio E. Celis,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
A Self-Enabling TGFβ Response Coupled to Stress Signaling
Coactivation of MEF2 by the SAP Domain Proteins Myocardin and MASTR
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Rosemary C Dietrich, Robert Incorvaia, Richard A Padgett 
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Stimulation of Type I Collagen Transcription in Human Skin Fibroblasts by TGF-β: Involvement of Smad 3  Shu-Jen Chen, Weihua Yuan, Yasuji Mori, Anait.
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The mlenapts RNA Helicase Mutation in Drosophila Results in a Splicing Catastrophe of the para Na+ Channel Transcript in a Region of RNA Editing  Robert.
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Cloning of a novel gene in the human kidney homologous to rat munc13s: Its potential role in diabetic nephropathy  Yong Song, Menachem Ailenberg, Mel.
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
14-3-3σ Is a p53-Regulated Inhibitor of G2/M Progression
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
SARA, a FYVE Domain Protein that Recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ Receptor
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Tong-Chuan He, Timothy A Chan, Bert Vogelstein, Kenneth W Kinzler  Cell 
Mutation of the Ca2+ Channel β Subunit Gene Cchb4 Is Associated with Ataxia and Seizures in the Lethargic (lh) Mouse  Daniel L Burgess, Julie M Jones,
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Characterization of Human FAST-1, a TGFβ and Activin Signal Transducer Shibin Zhou, Leigh Zawel, Christoph Lengauer, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 121-127 (July 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3

Figure 1 Sequence of hFAST-1 and Comparison to the Xenopus Homolog Conserved amino acids are shaded. The forkhead domain encompasses xFAST-1 residues 108–219 (Chen et al. 1996). The C-terminal Smad-interacting (SID) domain encompasses xFAST-1 residues 380–506 (Chen et al. 1997). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 121-127DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3)

Figure 2 Expression of hFAST-1 and Its Interaction with Smad2 (A) hFAST-1 was expressed in all tissues tested. RNA samples prepared from the indicated tissues were used as templates for RT-PCR analysis. The PCR primers used span a 100 bp intron and discriminate the spliced (423 bp) and unspliced (523 bp) RT-PCR products. The unspliced products arose from either genomic DNA or from unprocessed transcripts. (B) Both full-length hFAST-1 (FAST-FL) and its carboxyl terminus (FAST-SID) could interact with the carboxy-terminal (MH2) domain of Smad2 in vitro. Polypeptides encoding full-length hFAST-1 or its SID domain were generated by in vitro translation in the presence of 35S-labeled methionine and incubated with a GST-fusion protein containing the carboxyl terminus of Smad2 (GST-Smad2/MH2) immobilized on agarose beads. An irrelevant protein (PIG3, [Polyak et al. 1997]) was also translated and incubated with GST-Smad2/MH2 as a control. After extensive washing, the bound proteins were eluted and separated in a 4%–20% SDS-Tris-glycine gel that was dried and autoradiographed. 10% of the in vitro translated proteins used for binding to Smad2 were applied to the lanes labeled total. No binding was observed with a GST control protein. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 121-127DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3)

Figure 3 hFAST-1-Mediated Transcriptional Activation (A) hFAST-1 mediated transcriptional activation requires TGFβ. MvLu1 cells were transfected with pAR3-lux with or without pCMV-hFAST-1 (FAST-1). The transfected cells were cultured in the presence or absence of TGFβ1 (1 ng/ml). Cells were harvested and luciferase activity measured 20 hr following transfection. The results were normalized to the control in which cells were neither transfected with pCMV-hFAST-1 nor treated with TGFβ. Bars and brackets represents the means and standard deviations calculated from triplicate transfections. (B) Activin signaling leads to hFAST-1-mediated transcriptional activation. HCT116 cells were cotransfected with pAR3-lux, pCMV-hFAST-1 (FAST-1), and the constitutively active activin receptor ActRIB* as indicated. Luciferase activity was analyzed 20 hr later and the results normalized to controls transfected with reporter but without pCMV-hFAST-1 or ActR1B*. (C) hFAST-1-mediated transcriptional activation requires Smad4 and a functional hFAST-1 forkhead domain. HCT116 cells or their Smad4-deficient derivatives (5–18) were transfected with pAR3-lux plus pCMV-hFAST-1 (wt [FAST-1] or mutant H83R [FAST-1*]) plus the RII receptor for TGFβ as indicated. All cells were treated with TGFβ1 for 20 hr prior to harvest. Luciferase activity was normalized to the control in which cells were not transfected with pCMV-hFAST-1 or RII. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 121-127DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3)

Figure 4 Sequence-Specific DNA-Binding of hFAST-1 (A) Examples of EMSA of mock-selected or hFAST-1-selected clones. 32P-labeled PCR products generated from individual clones were incubated with a GST-fusion protein containing full-length hFAST-1 sequences. Derivation of clones and EMSA were performed as described in Experimental Procedures. Mock selected clones were used for comparison (C lanes). The positions of free probe and hFAST-1 bound probe (shift) are indicated. (B) Sequence summary of clones that bound to hFAST-1. The sequences of the relevant segment of 17 hFAST-1-binding clones were determined, and the fractions of clones containing the nucleotides at the indicated positions relative to the consensus are shown. (C) Binding of FBE to hFAST-1. Wild-type (FBE) or mutant (FBE*) oligonucleotides were incubated with 0.5–2.0 μg of GST-fusion proteins containing full-length hFAST-1 (FAST-FL) or only its forkhead domain (FAST-FH). GST-fusion proteins containing the MH1 or MH2 domains of Smad2 (S-N and S-C, respectively; Zawel et al. 1998) were used as controls. The FBE* oligonucleotide contained the sequence TCTGTATC in place of the consensus TGTGTATT but was otherwise identical to FBE. (D) Binding of ARE oligonucleotides to hFAST-1. EMSA was performed with (+) or without (−) 1 μg of GST-fusion protein containing full-length FAST-1 (FAST-FL). The sequence of the 50 bp ARE oligonucleotide differed by only 1 bp from ARE*, as described in the text. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 121-127DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3)

Figure 5 Transcriptional Activation through Adjacent FBE and SBE Sites (A) HaCaT cells were transfected with or without pCMV-hFAST-1 and the reporter constructs indicated in the figure. The transfected cells were cultured in the presence or absence of TGFβ1 (1 ng/ml) for 20 hr prior to harvest. Luciferase activities were normalized to the control in which cells were transfected with the reporter constructs alone. FBE, SBE, and FBE/SBE represent luciferase reporters containing one copy of FBE, one copy of SBE, or one copy of FBE adjacent to one copy of SBE. (B) HCT116 cells were transfected similarly, except with or without the RII receptor for TGFβ as indicated. All cells were treated with TGFβ1 for 20 hr prior to harvest. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 121-127DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80120-3)