Kevin D. Corbett, James M. Berger  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of T7 Gene 4 Ring Helicase Indicates a Mechanism for Sequential Hydrolysis of Nucleotides  Martin R Singleton, Michael R Sawaya, Tom.
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Dániel Szöllősi, Gergely Szakács, Peter Chiba, Thomas Stockner 
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
PcrA Helicase, a Prototype ATP-Driven Molecular Motor
Crystal Structure of the Vanadate-Inhibited Ca2+-ATPase
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Emerging Roles for Plant Topoisomerase VI
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Emerging Roles for Plant Topoisomerase VI
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Mijo Simunovic, Gregory A. Voth  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Structural Dissection of ATP Turnover in the Prototypical GHL ATPase TopoVI  Kevin D. Corbett, James M. Berger  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 873-882 (June 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural Homology in GHKL ATPases (A) Schematic view of GHL-family ATPases. The GHKL ATP binding domain is shown in yellow with its N-terminal strap in black, the transducer domain in orange, and diverse C-terminal dimerization domain(s) in blue. Bound ATP is represented by “ADP” and a “P” in a red circle signifies a nonhydrolyzed γ-phosphate. (B) Predicted configuration for the topoVI holoenzyme, using separate structures of the B-subunits (ATPase module) (Corbett and Berger, 2003) and the DNA binding A subunits (Nichols et al., 1999). The regions thought to connect these subunits have not been structurally determined. Domain coloring is as in (A), except for a nonconserved, topoVI-specific “H2TH” domain (purple). One chain of the dimer is shown entirely in gray for clarity. (C) Eukaryotic (S. cerevisiae) topoII built from separate structures of the ATPase module (Classen et al., 2003) and the DNA binding/cleavage region (Berger et al., 1996). (D) MutL, built from separate structures of the ATPase module (Ban et al., 1999) and the C-terminal dimerization domain (Guarne et al., 2004). Hsp90 (not shown) is dimeric and displays a similar global architecture to these proteins (Harris et al., 2004; Meyer et al., 2003; Prodromou et al., 1997b, 2000), but its structural states are less well understood. Structure 2005 13, 873-882DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TopoVI-B′ Active Site Conformation in Different Nucleotide Bound States Structures of the topoVI-B′ active site, illustrating the positions of important active site elements in six different states in the ATP hydrolysis cycle of the enzyme: (A) AMP-PNP bound dimer (Corbett and Berger, 2003); (B) ADP·AlF4− bound dimer; (C) ADP·Pi bound dimer; (D) ADP bound dimer; (E) ADP bound monomer; and (F) Apo monomer (Corbett and Berger, 2003). The GHKL domain is shown in yellow, the transducer domain in orange, main-chain nitrogen atoms of residues 107–111 (A only) in blue, Mg2+ ions in black, and the Ca2+ ion in the apo structure in green. For the four structures reported here (B–E), density from simulated annealing omit Fo-Fc maps is shown contoured at 3.0 σ (maps were calculated omitting the noted active site residues, nucleotide, and coordinating water molecules). The Mg2+ ion and coordinating waters in the ADP bound dimer structure (D) have high B factors (∼50 Å2) and, thus, the simulated annealing density is below the displayed contour level (1.5–2.0 σ). Structure 2005 13, 873-882DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TopoVI-B′ Subunit Conformation in Different Nucleotide Bound States (A) Overlays of multiple topoVI-B′ structures in different nucleotide bound and oligomeric states, arranged in an outline of the ATP hydrolysis cycle. The two ADP bound states are shown overlaid in the center, highlighting the structural transition from the restrained to the relaxed state. AMP-PNP bound topoVI-B′ (Corbett and Berger, 2003) is shown in yellow, ADP·AlF4− in orange, ADP·Pi in red, ADP (dimer state) in brown, ADP (monomer state) in blue, and Apo (Corbett and Berger, 2003) in green. Lys427 (“switch lysine”) is shown in black, with nucleotides and Mg2+ ions in magenta. The Ca2+ ion bound in the active site of the apo form is shown in light blue. (B) Bottom views of the restrained and relaxed states, showing the tunnel into which Lys427 is inserted in the restrained state and through which Pi is released in the relaxed state. The GHKL domain is shown as a yellow surface with the dimer-related chain in gray; the transducer domain is shown as a brown (restrained state) or blue (relaxed state) coil. Structure 2005 13, 873-882DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Proposed Mechanism of ATP Hydrolysis by TopoVI-B′ (A) Gln34 helps position Glu38 in the active site, which acts as a general base to abstract a proton from the attacking water molecule. (B) The γ-phosphate passes through a pentavalent transition state, in which negative charge on the nonbridging oxygens is stabilized by Lys427, Mg2+, and main-chain nitrogen atoms of the ATP lid (amino acids 107–111). The reaction has been modeled as mostly dissociative in nature, although the presence of positively charged groups surrounding the γ-phosphate suggests the possibility of at least partial associative character (Maegley et al., 1996; O’Brien and Herschlag, 1999). (C) Completion of hydrolysis results in ADP·Pi bound in the active site. The view for all three panels is equivalent to the view in Figure 2, with states in (A), (B), and (C) corresponding to Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C, respectively. Structure 2005 13, 873-882DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Model for ATP Hydrolysis and Strand Passage in Type II Topos Schematic view of the reactions of topoVI (top) and topoII (bottom). The enzyme first binds a G segment (green), then binds two ATP molecules and a T segment (blue), and dimerization of the GHKL domains traps the T segment inside the enzyme (I). ATP binding, in addition to mediating dimerization, causes reorientation of the transducer and GHKL domains into an “ATP-restrained” state (II). GHKL dimerization around a T segment and the conformation change to the restrained state combine to create strain on the transducer domains, represented here by zig-zag lines. Some time after hydrolysis of one ATP, the strain applied by the T segment is able to cause a structural transition in the ATPase module that, in turn, forces apart the A subunit dimer and the cleaved G segment to complete strand passage (III). Reclosing of the A subunit and hydrolysis of the second ATP allows enzyme resetting (IV). Domains are colored as in Figure 1. A nonhydrolyzed γ-phosphate is represented by “P” in a red circle, and a hydrolyzed γ-phosphate is represented by “Pi” in a black circle. The asymmetric nature of ATP hydrolysis by topoII has been well established; given the structural similarity of topoVI, we anticipate that this enzyme will behave likewise. Structure 2005 13, 873-882DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions