Diana M. P. Galassi*, Barbara Fiasca*, Andrea Piermarocchi°

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
Advertisements

1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Bárbara Willaarts 1,2, Mario Ballesteros 2 and Nuria Hernández-Mora 3 1 Observatorio del Agua-Fundación Botín 2 CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
Knowledge and research needs for wetlands and lakes IWRM presentation 18 November 2008 Johan Schutten Senior Wetland Ecologist SEPA.
Session Operational tools for sound basin management: The role of evaluation and information systems Patrick LAVARDE Director General ONEMA- The.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies
ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution on Rivers and Lakes Item 4 Recent results and updating.
Environmental policies in Europe
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Research areas – First draft for discussion
Restoration target values?
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key
The EU WATER POLICY.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
toitototototoot toitototototoot
One-out-all-out and other indicators
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
SPI activities update 22nd WORKING GROUP C PLENARY MEETING
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
One-out-all-out and other indicators
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
RT 1 : Ecological Status Research area 1 : Developing and validating new Bioassessment tools gaps for Transitional and Coastal waters (methods, taxonomy)
The normal balance of ingredients
River Basin Management Plans
Hydropower and the WFD: constraint or opportunity?
EU biodiversity policy: Towards a post-2010 strategy
Drafting group Mixing Zones
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Scheldt Pilot River Basin
Part I.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE BARCELONA CONVENTION
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
UK Technical Advisory Group
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
Water Quality 台灣地區河川污染特性 污染來源 工業廢水污染:老街溪、中港溪、大甲溪、北港溪、八掌溪、二仁溪、花蓮溪。
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Luc Feyen
Water Science meets Policy Brussels 30 September 2010
E-flow guidance and groundwater
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
Frequently asked questions Part I: Objectives and differences in scope of the WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and.
Peter Kristensen European Environment Agency
Good groundwater chemical status
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Toitototototoot Strengthening consistency, coordination & cooperation between nature, biodiversity, water & marine policy Some feedback from France.
MAES EU Wide Ecosystem Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Diana M. P. Galassi*, Barbara Fiasca*, Andrea Piermarocchi° LIFE+ project AQUALIFE: biological indicators for GDE classification under the formal expression of interest by the Ministry of the Environment and the technical agency ISPRA Diana M. P. Galassi*, Barbara Fiasca*, Andrea Piermarocchi° E-mail: dianamariapaola.galassi@univaq.it *University of L’Aquila, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, L’Aquila (Italy) °University of Teramo - Faculty of Law, Teramo (Italy) Luxembourg 5-6 October 2015

What do we have? Groundwater associated aquatic ecosystems (GWAAEs) are ecosystems that belong to surface water bodies (rivers, lakes, transitional WB or coastal WB), which status (ecological or chemical) or environmental objectives could be affected by alterations of groundwater level or pollutant concentrations that are transported through groundwater.

What is still missing?

2006/118/EC Recital – point 20 Research should be conducted in order to provide better criteria for ensuring groundwater ecosystem quality and protection. Where necessary, the findings obtained should be taken into account when implementing or revising this Directive. Such research, as well as dissemination of knowledge, experience and research findings, needs to be encouraged and funded.

How many types of GDEs? 1. Ecosystems Entirely Dependent on Groundwater (i.e. SGDEs) Not included in WFD and GWD 2. Ecosystems Highly Dependent on Groundwater Only partially included in WFD and GWD 3. Ecosystems with Proportional Dependence on Groundwater Included in WFD and GWD 4. Ecosystems which may only use Groundwater Opportunistically

What lies beneath? the ecological dimension of groundwater

What is the need to enter groundwater ecology in routine monitoring programs? 1. Groundwater species are very sensitive to groundwater quality and quantity alterations 2. Groundwater species may well work as early warning systems 3. Groundwater species are leading actors for GDE goods and services – ecosystem engineers

Are there constraints to enter groundwater ecology in routine monitoring programs? NO! The generalized acception of the groundwater biodiversity as «unknown» is a wrong assumption At the entrance in force of the biological monitoring of surface waters (1.2. Normative definitions of ecological status classifications in the WFD) the same contraints were found by end-users and stakeholders The BIOFRESH project (EU 7th Framework Programme - Contract No. 226874) listed all the groundwater species living in the GWAAEs across Europe (database in publication)

Is there enough knowledge to include groundwater ecology in routine monitoring programs? YES! The entirely or highly dependent groundwater ecosystems harbour a vast multitude of invertebrates and microbes, as best indicators of ecosystem status. The misconception of the groundwater as a «desert» is no longer accepted.

Natural drivers (left) and stressors (right) in different organism groups illustrating knowledge gaps After Stendera et al., 2012

Altered river discharge: the dams Altered flow discharge determines a strong increase in riverbed sediment erosion and high instability of the hyporheic zone reference site The hyporheic community changes in abundance and species composition

Groundwater over-exploitation The hyporheic zone loses its biodiversity and related ecosystem services X After Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes and Practices (1998) - USDA National Conservation Center

Hyporheic fauna response to global warming: the case study of the Rhone River (France) (After Dehedin et al., 2013)

Groundwater fauna response to groundwater withdrawal (After Di Lorenzo & Galassi, 2013) Mann-Withney U-tests, p=0.043; p=0.049

The Aqualife test-area

Toward the assessment of an integrative multimetric index scoring the ecological status and threats of the GDEs http://www.aqualifeproject.eu Integrative multimetric index of GDE status and threats Alteration of GW quality in GDEs? scoring Alteration of GW quantity in GDEs? Testing species sensitivity (ecotoxicology, genotoxicity, proteomics) MODEL SPECIES FOR GDEs Testing Community/assemblage composition under different pressures and impacts

Thank you for your attention