6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Informal document GRPE-70-14
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
(After the EPPR telephone conference on 11/May/2016)
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Discussion paper – Major Issues
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Informal Document: ACSF-16-09
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Status report of “Reversing Motion”
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position
Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin
Progress report of GRSG informal group
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-05
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Informal document GRVA-04-34
Presentation transcript:

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, 19-21 April 2016 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF-06-22 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, 19-21 April 2016 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Version 1.4

Reminder from ACSF-03-12 (Munich)

General provisions for ACSF Special provisions for ACSF cat. E Extracts from ACSF-05-16 General provisions for ACSF Special provisions for ACSF cat. E 5.1.6.1. Whenever the an Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes operational, this shall be indicated to the driver. and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning, [especially, in case of category E termination of control is described] in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 5.4.3. by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control. 5.4.3. Special Warning Provisions for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions 5.4.3.1 Any termination of control initiated by the system other than specified in 5.6.1.4.7 shall produce a distinctive driver warning including visual warning] and either an acoustic warning or an haptic warning until the driver has resumed steering control. 5.6.1. Special Provisions for Category E ACSF 5.6.1.1.7. The system shall at any time give a noticeable and distinctive signalization to the driver about the system status. This signalization shall be at least a visual signal. Any change in system status shall be indicated by an optical and [, if not initiated by the driver,] either an acoustic or haptic signal. The system status shall be indicated to the driver by a visual signal. The indication shall [at least] distinguish between the system status manual stand-by Mode, active Mode and failure Mmode. The indication shall be present as long as the relevant system status persists. When the system is manually switched off by the driver, the indication of manual stand-by Mmode and failure Mmode may be suppressed. Any change in system status shall be indicated by a visual and either an acoustic or haptic signal. Consistency tbc

General provisions for ACSF Comments & proposals 5.1.6.1. Whenever the an Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes operational, this shall be indicated to the driver. and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning, [especially, in case of category E termination of control is described] in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 5.4.3. by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control. 5.4.3. Special Warning Provisions for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions 5.4.3.1 Any termination of control initiated by the system other than specified in 5.6.1.4.7 shall produce a distinctive driver warning including visual warning] and either an acoustic warning or an haptic warning until the driver has resumed steering control. Comments 1: “operational” should be clarified Consistency with 5.6.1.1.7. (HMI for cat E) to be checked Comments 2: “especially” is unspecific Specific requirements to category should be in 5.6.1.1.7 Proposal to delete text in [ ] Comments 3: Not relevant for a low speed ACSF (e.g. park Assist or RCP). The proposal is to come back to the original requirement, given the low speed / low criticality: “Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning“ An haptic/acoustic warning is not necessary for an ACSF-B1, since the driver is hands-on and steering; a visual warning should be enough When the vehicle comes to standstill, it should be possible to suppress the warning signal. Proposal: amend this paragraph or move it to special provisions per category (e.g. 5.6.1.1.7 for cat E)

(ready to intervene or intervening) = “available” in LKAS ad-hoc group What does “operational” mean? LKAS (as in ISO 11270) (valid for LKAS-CSF and ACSF-B1) (ready to intervene or intervening) = “available” in LKAS ad-hoc group Remark  Automatic activation when the conditions for operation are fulfilled No automatic activation when the conditions for operation are fulfilled, deliberate action from driver required. ACSF standby ACSF active ACSF OFF Manual Steering Automatic Steering on off activate deactivate ACSF-03-12 (valid for ACSF-B2 and E) What does “operational” mean: “switched on” “active” "the system is able to intervene without further action or confirmation by driver“ …?

Proposal for new definitions 2.4.8.18 An [ACSF / ADASS] is in “off mode” (or “switched off”) when prevented from controlling the steering system. 2.4.8.19 An [ACSF / ADASS] is in “standby mode” when the [function / system] is switched on but the conditions for being active are not all met. In this mode, the system does not control the steering system. 2.4.8.20 An [ACSF / ADASS] is in “active mode” (or “active”) when the [function / system] is switched on and the conditions for being active are met. In this mode, the system [continuously or discontinuously] controls the steering system. [2.4.8.21 An [ACSF / ADASS] is “operational” when the system is [active] ] Comment: maybe this definition is not needed, e.g. “operational” could be replaced by [active] in 5.1.6.1 2.4.8.22 An [ACSF / ADASS] is in “failure mode” when the [function / system] has detected a failure.

Proposed requirements Changes to ACSF-05-16 in blue text General provisions for ACSF The same warning as for a transition demand maybe used. In the case of ACSF category A, a short [but distinctive] warning is deemed to fulfill the warning requirement above. In the case of ACSF category B1, the warning maybe optical only. 5.6.1. Special Provisions for Category E ACSF 5.6.1.1.7. The system … signal. The system status shall be indicated to the driver by a visual signal. The indication shall [at least] distinguish between the system status manual stand-by Mode, active Mode and failure Mmode. The indication shall be present as long as the relevant system status persists. When the system is manually switched off by the driver, the indication of manual stand-by Mmode and failure Mmode may be suppressed. Any change in system status shall be indicated by a visual and either an acoustic or haptic signal. 5.1.6.1. Whenever the an Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes [operational] [active], this shall be indicated to the driver. and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning, [especially, in case of category E termination of control is described] in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 5.4.3. by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control. 5.4.3. Special Warning Provisions for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions 5.4.3.1 Any termination of control initiated by the system (i.e. when the active mode is automatically deactivated by the system), other than specified in 5.6.1.4.7 shall produce a distinctive driver warning including visual warning] and either an acoustic warning or an haptic warning until the driver has resumed steering control or the vehicle is at standstill. Special provisions for ACSF cat. E

Proposed requirements Cleaned-up version General provisions for ACSF The same warning as for a transition demand maybe used. In the case of ACSF category A, a short [but distinctive] warning is deemed to fulfill the warning requirement above. In the case of ACSF category B1, the warning maybe optical only. 5.6.1. Special Provisions for Category E ACSF 5.6.1.1.7. The system status shall be indicated to the driver by a visual signal. The indication shall [at least] distinguish between stand-by, active and failure mode. The indication shall be present as long as the relevant system status persists. 5.1.6.1. Whenever the an Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes [operational] [active], this shall be indicated to the driver. and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 5.4.3. by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control. 5.4.3. Special Warning Provisions for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions 5.4.3.1 Any termination of control initiated by the system (i.e. when the active mode is automatically deactivated by the system), other than specified in 5.6.1.4.7 shall produce a distinctive driver warning including visual warning] and either an acoustic warning or an haptic warning until the driver has resumed steering control or the vehicle is at standstill. Special provisions for ACSF cat. E

Backup slides

Example of implementation « ACSF off » may mean: The ECU is electrically switched off or… ACSF is waiting for the function to be switched on by driver and does nothing else or… ACSF is waiting for the function to be switched on by driver, yet the ACSF sensors and/or actuators are used for other functionalities which are not ACSF (e.g. sign recognition, LDWS, steering assistance, side wind compensation…) or… ACSF is monitoring the conditions for operation, waiting for the driver to request activation… Manual Steering Automatic Steering ACSF OFF ACSF standby activate ACSF active on deactivate off « ACSF standby » may work as follows: ACSF is monitoring the conditions for operation ACSF indicates to driver if the conditions for operation are fulfilled ACSF is monitoring driver request to activate ACSF (“deliberate action”) If conditions are fulfilled and driver requests ACSF to be activated, ACSF is activated