Discharge disposition from acute care after traumatic brain injury: The effect of insurance type Leighton Chan, MD, MPH, Jason Doctor, PhD, Nancy Temkin, PhD, Richard F. MacLehose, MS, Peter Esselman, MD, Kathleen Bell, MD, Sureyya Dikmen, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 82, Issue 9, Pages 1151-1154 (September 2001) DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24892 Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Percentage of patients discharged to each site by admission year. Data are for all patients alive at discharge. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 82, 1151-1154DOI: (10.1053/apmr.2001.24892) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Unadjusted percentages of discharges to SNFs and rehabilitation facilities by insurance type. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 82, 1151-1154DOI: (10.1053/apmr.2001.24892) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Adjusted RR (95% CI) of discharge to SNF vs rehabilitation facility, comparing HMO and Medicaid groups with patients in FFS (RR = 1). This model includes mechanism of injury, but has tested for confounding because of age, sex, race, temporal trends (year of discharge), AIS (head), comorbid conditions, GCS score in the emergency department, and intent of injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 82, 1151-1154DOI: (10.1053/apmr.2001.24892) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions