Fig. 1 Area and carbon distributions in SFs in the lowland Neotropics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 5 In vivo MIP imaging of lipid and protein in C. elegans.
Advertisements

Fig. 1 Upward emission functions used to compute the maps.
NCMs regulate T cell survival in TLOs via PD-L1.
Fig. 2 Absolute recovery of species richness and relative recovery of species richness and composition in relation to stand age for Neotropical secondary.
Fig. 2 Views of the Pincer-FATKIN interface and the dimer interface.
Fig. 4 States of the Antarctic Ice Sheet after 10,000 years.
Fig. 4 Power and wavelet spectra of benthic δ18O.
Fig. 3 Comparison between predicted change in DT since the LIG and observed sea-level highstands. Comparison between predicted change in DT since the LIG.
Fig. 3 Projected gains in MCP.
Fig. 1 Demographic shifts in knowledge producers.
Fig. 2 Quantification and mechanisms leading to the CAH for reentrant and doubly reentrant geometries at zero applied pressure. Quantification and mechanisms.
Fig. 4 Aβ16–22 fibrils increase the aggregation rate of Aβ40 to a greater extent than Aβ16–22 monomers. Aβ16–22 fibrils increase the aggregation rate of.
Fig. 3 Oil, gas, and FP water variations with time.
Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.
Fig. 2 Some examples of weekly forecasts (the number of the forecasts are reported on Table 1). Some examples of weekly forecasts (the number of the forecasts.
Fig. 2 Reference-fixing experiment, results.
Order parameter θ as a function of time for the five events analyzed
Fig. 1 ROS of tropical rainforest landscapes in lowlands.
Fig. 1 Cryo-EM structure of yeast Elp123 showing its active site.
Fig. 2 Full-frame images recording the violation of a Bell inequality in four images. Full-frame images recording the violation of a Bell inequality in.
Fig. 3 Gate voltage dependence of the areal iDMI and PMA.
Destabilization of the WAIS in the unperturbed reference simulation
Fig. 6 External drivers and model response.
Fig. 3 Affective responses by exchange condition (PR and RE), level of redistribution (0 = random, one-card, and two-card exchange), and outcome as winner.
Fig. 1 Proportions of normative beliefs by exchange condition, level of redistribution (0 = random, one-card, and two-card exchange), and outcome as winner.
Fig. 3 Forward model. Forward model. Summary of the resampled Monte Carlo simulations shown as histograms for epoch 1 (red), epoch 2 (green), and epoch.
Fig. 2 Images of complex structures formed via sequential folding.
Fig. 1 Map of the study area including the northwestern end of the Hawaiian Ridge and the southern portion of the ESC. Map of the study area including.
Fig. 4 EUV TG signal from Si.
Fig. 4 Identification of C
Fig. 3 Equatorial vertical structures of the four types of MJO.
Fig. 4 Horizontal structures of the four types of MJO.
Fig. 3 Transport characterization of dry-assembled devices.
Fig. 1 Volcanotectonic and chemical stratigraphy of the upper part of the OS of the BGB, with estimates of water depth. Volcanotectonic and chemical stratigraphy.
Fig. 4 Experimental outputs.
Fig. 4 Structural design of an F-TENG.
Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests by Renato Crouzeilles, Mariana S. Ferreira,
Fig. 2 Large-area and high-density assembly of AuNPs.
Fig. 3 Abundance for all OR-expressing OSN subtypes across mammalian evolution. Abundance for all OR-expressing OSN subtypes across mammalian evolution.
Fig. 3 Production of protein and Fe(II) at the end of growth correlated with increasing concentrations of ferrihydrite in the media that contained 0.2.
Fig. 2 NH3, NOx, SO2, and NMVOC emission changes triggered by the JJJ clean air policy. NH3, NOx, SO2, and NMVOC emission changes triggered by the JJJ.
Fig. 1 Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers. Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers.
Fig. 2 Top 10 countries, ecoregions, conservation hotspots, and KBAs with the largest area of restoration hotspots. Top 10 countries, ecoregions, conservation.
Fig. 4 Relationships between light and economic parameters.
Fig. 3 Plumage brightness (PC1) for each sex in relation to morphological, ecological, and behavioral traits. Plumage brightness (PC1) for each sex in.
Fig. 5 Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR) and CO reduction reactions (CORR) on two catalysts.
Relationships between species richness and temperature or latitude
Fig. 2 NP characterization.
Fig. 1 Fractional coverage of the mapping method used in this study.
by N. T. Nassar, T. E. Graedel, and E. M. Harper
Fig. 4 CO2 emission changes triggered by the JJJ clean air policy.
Fig. 2 Comparison of Bayesian estimates of the TMRCA of the Native American founder haplogroups and of the divergence from Siberian lineages. Comparison.
Fig. 2 Average reduction in grain micronutrients, iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) concentration at elevated relative to ambient [CO2] for 18 cultivated rice lines.
Fig. 2 40Ar/39Ar age bias as a function of grain geometry for D-D fusion neutron or fission neutron–irradiated minerals. 40Ar/39Ar age bias as a function.
Fig. 2 Number of years that would have been required for the observed vertebrate species extinctions in the last 114 years to occur under a background.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.
Fig. 1 Global primate species richness, distributions, and the percentage of species threatened and with declining populations. Global primate species.
Fig. 4 Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal phyla across France. Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal.
Fig. 3 TEM evidence of carbon doping in WS2.
Fig. 3 Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented memory. Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented.
Fig. 10 Map of light pollution’s visual impact on the night sky.
Distribution of applications from AA/B scientists across topics
Fig. 3 Shaping-induced stresses and strains.
Fig. 3 Voltage-driven phase switching in a 1T-TaS2 nano-thick crystal.
Fig. 4 Matrix for intersections of differentially expressed transcripts between RNAiAFL transgenic and null kernels. Matrix for intersections of differentially.
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of five city groups.
Fig. 4 In situ mapping of human patient breast cancer and stroma.
Fig. 6 Net primary productivity after nuclear war.
Fig. 1 Uplift of the Isthmus of Panama and global sea levels over the last 20 My. Uplift of the Isthmus of Panama and global sea levels over the last 20.
Fig. 2 Time series of secularization versus GDP per capita, from four illustrative countries, over the 20th century. Time series of secularization versus.
Presentation transcript:

Fig. 1 Area and carbon distributions in SFs in the lowland Neotropics. Area and carbon distributions in SFs in the lowland Neotropics. (A and B) Percentages of modeled forest area (A) and AGC stock (B) in different land cover and forest age classes in 2008: cropland, pasture, forest ≤20 years (YSF), forest 20 to 60 years (MSF), forest 60 to 100 years (old SF), and forest >100 years (arbitrarily used as cutoff for OGF). (C) AGC stocks of YSFs and MSFs in 2008 (filled bars), and their net carbon sequestration from 2008 to 2048 (hatched bars). The total size of the bar indicates the total carbon stocks of those forests in 2048. Stacked bars are shown for five scenarios, where 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of the area are allowed to recover. The hatched yellow bar below the zero line indicates the carbon loss under these scenarios due to forest conversion to pasture or cropland in 2008, and the blue bar indicates the net sequestration potential of the different scenarios (carbon sequestration from 2008 to 2048 minus conversion-driven carbon loss in 2008). (D) Total AGC of YSFs and MSFs over the period 2008–2048 under different regeneration scenarios. (E) AGC of YSFs and MSFs in 2008, and their net carbon sequestration from 2008 to 2048 given 100% recovery, for each country separately. The total size of the bar indicates the total carbon stocks (AGC) of those forests in 2048. (F) Total AGC of YSFs and MSFs from 2008 to 2048 for the four countries with the largest carbon sequestration potential in naturally regenerating forests (see table S2 for more details). Robin L. Chazdon et al. Sci Adv 2016;2:e1501639 Copyright © 2016, The Authors