Best Management Practices (BMP) Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

Governmental/Public Affairs Randy Long, Director, Legislative and Government Affairs Beth Allman, Sr. Manager Cyndi Andrews, Court Services Specialist.
Amanda Platt Project Manager California Association of RCDs Mark Roberson, PhD Consulting Scientist Sacramento Area Water Forum PROVIDING URBAN STYLE WATER.
Agriculture Best Management Practices Overview LEAD Workshop October 19, 2011 Darrell Smith.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Achieving Better Care by Monitoring All Prescriptions (ABC-MAP) Act 191 of 2014 Board Meeting April 8, 2015.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
ELIGIBILITY FINAL RULE Office of Head Start Administration for Children and Families U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM NC Water Resources Congress October 30, 2014.
Mississippi Soil & Water Conservation Commission.
The South Florida Watershed
FORMS FOR THE FUTURE CTBCP Annual Meeting March 20, 2014 Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Prevention and Health Promotion Administration.
Printed by DEVELOPING A NON-PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA Scott A. Uhlich, MCP Georgia Department of Human.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Districts In Good Standing. Origins Discussed at November 2010 meeting Approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission during January 2011 meeting.
An Alternative Conservation Program for Irrigated Agriculture Arizona Department of Water Resources.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Environmental Management Systems in Massachusetts April, 2003.
Ag Water Metering Program Since 2004, over 11,500 water meters have been placed in all counties south of the Fall line. Data from these meters is being.
Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.6 Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY The Legislative Sunset Review Process Larry Novey Chief Legislative Analyst, OPPAGA The Florida.
Care Network of the Treasure Coast.  The mission of the Care Network of the Treasure Coast (CNTC) is to serve as the advisory body for the Ryan White.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS ANNUAL MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2013 Richard Street Tri-county & City SWCD Fredericksburg VA.
Florida’s Unified Stormwater Rule Status Lake Okeechobee WRAC November 2007 FDEP, Chad Kennedy Presenting for Eric Livingston and Michael Bateman.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
Director Assistant DirectorAssistant Director Bureau of PesticidesBureau of Pesticides Bureau of Compliance Monitoring Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Colorado’s Smoke Management Program and HB Pat McLaughlin, EPSII Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment,
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
NRCS, CA 2011 DAN JOHNSON EQIP IWM Delivery. Overview of New Guidance Instructions and supporting tools and documents are going to reside in Section IV.
Proactive Rental Housing Registry and Inspection Ordinance.
1 CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM (CSP) Continuous Sign-Up Kick-Off Steve Parkin Stewardship Program Team August 10, 2009.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
“ To provide leadership to help people conserve, improve, and sustain the natural resources and environment of Highlands County”
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
TWS/SELC Road Condition Study Two Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment, Masters Candidates and one Duke University, Undergraduate.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Monitoring institute. University of Jammu
Recommended Practices in Housing Credit Compliance
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Transaction costs of nonpoint source water quality credits:
Conservation Districts
Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference
Training for New District Test Coordinators
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Program
New State Law goes into effect July 1, 2018 (HB1091)
Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role
Methods and Assistance Program (MAP) Reviews Lori Fetterman, MAP Supervisor Emily Hightree, MAP Team Lead Property Tax Assistance Division October 12,
Water Quality Restoration Challenges
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Conservation Districts
2018 Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Safeguards and Security Working Group (SSWG) Meeting Opening Remarks Tuesday, July 17, 2018 Marc A. Brooks,
Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI).
Partnerships Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Review of planned subdivisions
Central District overview and the 2016 Water Bill
Presentation transcript:

Best Management Practices (BMP) Program Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Office of Agricultural Water Policy Christopher Pettit, Director

How Are Site-Specific BMPs Determined? Site - specific evaluation tailored to the features of individual properties Soil types Slope Water features Size of property Existing infrastructure, i.e. irrigation Technological ability of producer Cost share available to assist with implementation All Producers are enrolled with the assistance of an OAWP Field staff person. Filling out the applicable checklist is a collaborative process that takes into account site specific factors at each location. Each property is unique and soil types, slope, water and/or sensitive features, existing infrastructure such as irrigation system or surface water control structures, the technological ability of the producer and size of the property all influence the BMP selection process at each location. Producers Notice the State of their Intent to manage their property in a specific manner as designated by the checklist within the manual. For BMPs that are identified as needing to be implemented, cost share is available to assist with implementation.

FDACS Cost Share Program FDACS contracts with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and Resource Conservation and Development Councils delivers FDACS cost share to producers Most efficient delivery of state reimbursements Mostly electronic Collect an administrative fee May also serve as contractor for Conservation Technicians

How Do We Know That Agricultural Producers Are Following BMPs? Required by Rule 5M-1 F.A.C. Annual Certification –electronic and/or staff assisted Implementation Verification Site Visit – Performed year round through field staff site visits In the NEEPA and in any other adopted BMAP, agricultural producers must either implement appropriate BMPs or monitor their water quality to prove that they meet state water quality standards. FDACS has referred landowners to the FDEP for enforcement of the water quality monitoring provision. In an adopted BMAP, agricultural producers must either enroll in and implement applicable BMPs or conduct water quality monitoring prescribed by DEP to prove that they meet water quality standards. Statewide, 54% of agricultural acres are enrolled in the FDACS BMP program. Further 76% of all irrigated acres in the state are enrolled in the BMP program. NOTE: why irrigated acres important – most of water use / nutrient impacts Rule 5M-1 describes the implementation verification process and corrective action procedures. An annual certification process, identifying the implementation of common practices is published in an annual report for the Legislature. 74% of enrolled producers participated in this data gathering for the report due July 1. BMP implementation verification site visits are prioritized based on the age of the Notice of Intent, commodity type, location of property in a BMAP or PFA and whether the producer has participated in the Annual Certification process. OAWP staff conducted BMP implementation verification site visits on 31% of the sites enrolled in the BMP program. Staff do a thorough review of all applicable BMPs at each site visit, verify that the appropriate records are being kept and visually inspect any cost shared BMPs. OAWP works with DEP to prioritize outreach within BMAPs. Producers who do not enroll in BMPs are referred to DEP for enforcement.

Status of Implementation of Agricultural BMPs in the Lake Okeechobee BMAP area

Status of Implementation of Agricultural BMPs in the Caloosahatchee Estuary BMAP area

Status of Implementation of Agricultural BMPs in the St Status of Implementation of Agricultural BMPs in the St. Lucie River and Estuary BMAP area